Popular Posts

Monday, June 22, 2020

SCOTUS-Enabled Totalitarianism

The Court's decision on "sex" opened the door for the evisceration of the women's movement.

“You can’t just proclaim yourself a female and be able to compete against women. There must be some standards, and having a penis and competing as a woman would not fit that standard.” —tennis great and long-time homosexual-rights activistMartina Navratilova, December 2018

“‘Woman’ is not an idea in a man’s head. ‘Woman’ is not a pink brain, a liking for Jimmy Choos or any of the other sexist ideas now somehow touted as progressive. Moreover, the ‘inclusive’ language that calls female people ‘menstruators’ and ‘people with vulvas’ strikes many women as dehumanising and demeaning.” —author J.K. Rowling, June 2020

Whether an increasingly impotent women’s movement realizes it or not, last Monday’s 6-3 Supreme Court ruling has made biological reality irrelevant. While anyone with an ounce of integrity would know that when Congress passed the 1964 Civil Rights Act, Title VII’s prohibition of sexual discrimination meant sex in the biological sense, a majority of justices swept aside thousands of years of biological reality in favor of progressive ideology.

More

3 comments:

  1. This is communism
    The enslavement of humanity

    ReplyDelete
  2. Martin Navratilova wrote a book.
    The title is, “Tennis Without Balls.”

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.