On Monday’s broadcast of the Fox News Channel’s “Hannity,” Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz reacted to the raid of Trump attorney Michael Cohen by stating, “this is a very dangerous day today for lawyer-client relations.”
Dershowitz said, “Look, this is a very dangerous day today for lawyer-client relations. I deal with clients all the time. I tell them on my word of honor that what you tell me is sacrosanct. And now they say, just based on probable cause, even though there was cooperation with Cohen, they can burst into the office, grab all the computers, and then give it to another FBI agent, and say, ‘You’re the firewall. We want you now to read all these confidential communications, tell us which ones we can get and which ones we can’t get.’ You know, if this were — the shoe were on the other foot, if this were Hillary Clinton being investigated, and they went into her lawyer’s office, the ACLU would be on every television station in America jumping up and down. The deafening silence of the ACLU and civil libertarians about the intrusion into the lawyer-client confidentiality is really appalling.”
More
DelMarVa's Premier Source for News, Opinion, Analysis, and Human Interest Contact Publisher Joe Albero at alberobutzo@wmconnect.com or 410-430-5349
Few of us have had the need for confidentiality at this level,but don't think that Catholic Priests and therapists of all description aren't taking notice.
ReplyDeleteAfter 14 months waiting on the release of the FISA warrant application to see the justification for the Russian collusion investigation yesterday they released two pages out of a thousand...RAID THEIR OFFICE !
ReplyDeleteAttorney client privilege does not apply when the attorney is involved in the crime.
ReplyDeletePost Constitutional America.
ReplyDeleteRule of Law now void.
So sad America....So sad...
Constitutional Republic . . . never was a Democracy (communism)
ReplyDeleteIt's time to raid Meuller's office and his lawyers' too. Time to draw this crap to a close.
ReplyDeleteNOTHING written on paper is worth the paper it is written on.
ReplyDelete