Popular Posts

Sunday, May 28, 2017

A Viewer Writes: Wicomico Sheriff's Department Above The Law?

One of Mike Lewis' finest riding around without a third break light. I see him every single morning on the way to work. I called the sheriffs office last week to let them know. Still not fixed. If it were me I would've been pulled over and slapped with a repair order. I forgot, they are above the law.

58 comments:

  1. I see people every day with a bulb out, day time running light. Not a federal offence. Maybe he don't even know its out. Go report drug dealers instead.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 9:04am agree 100%. To the author of the article/pic....get a freakin life. These officers put it on the line every single day and they are competent, decent people trying to protect YOU and I.

      Delete
    2. The person said it was reported to the Sheriff's office so he has to know it does not work. Read the article.

      Delete
  2. Md law only requires 2 working brake lights.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Not exactly true, under COMAR, all vehicles manufactured after September 1, 1985 are required to have a center high mounted stop lamp.

      Delete
    2. Furthermore any lights on a vehicle installed by the factory must be kept in working order.

      Delete
    3. My son got pulled over my Salisbury police and given a warning to fix his

      Delete
  3. 9:05, Tell that to ALL of the alleged drug dealers the WCSO pulls over on the Bypass claiming ONE of their lights were out.

    ReplyDelete
  4. See them in personal vehicles talking on the phone. Puts us all in danger. They are no more skilled than I in operating a vehicle. If outlawed for cited safety should apply equally and without exception.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ya but what scares me worse is seeing them operating a 17" laptop screen running 75 down rt.50 . When I see them I point and shake my head that normally makes them laugh at me. As for being more skilled drivers they are far from it there class is less than two weeks on learning to drive and operate a vehicle as well as using as an offensive tool and defensive tool.

      Delete
    2. Agreed, should not be able to use a computer wile driving. Law's should apply equally.

      Delete
  5. If the other two work, is there a legit reason to ticket for a repair order? You done did your citizen by taking time to call about non functioning light. IMO not a drawer twisting event.

    See FD personnel wrote a letter to the Times. Street talk is others have not posted it, yet.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Joe, I couldn't of said it better myself!! I'm tired of the double standard.

    ReplyDelete
  7. The law requires that all manufactured parts be maintained in working order. Here's some advice though, get a life.

    ReplyDelete
  8. drive on route 50 no head lights on

    ReplyDelete
  9. Curious about two things: where in Wicomico County is there a five lane road in a commercially developed area, with all those overhead signs; and, second, when did Sheriff Lewis switch from buying Tahoes to Mitsubishi Outlanders? There is also no sign of a light bar on the vehicle.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's a Dodge emblem on a Durango. Get your bifocals replaced!

      Delete
    2. Hey Einstein! The picture is in front on the Centre northbound. Dodge emblem clearly visible. And it's an unmarked vehicle so it wouldn't have a light bar.

      Delete
    3. That is in Salisbury at Mall area in front of Walmart

      Delete
  10. 9:34, This is right in front of the entrance to the Centre of Salisbury Mall.

    ReplyDelete
  11. What type of vehicle is it?

    ReplyDelete
  12. He probable doesn't even know its out. You people are being as petty as Democrats are. Don't stoop to their level

    ReplyDelete
  13. @9:34 Mitsubishi Outlanders? That is a Dodge Durango.

    ReplyDelete
  14. 9:26 just becasue a law for safety says manufactures have to have 3 break lights, there is no law that says the top third light has to be working and is subject to a repair order or being stopped... Again you didn't look up the law... You must be a cop for the way you try to twist words and twist some of the law...

    9:30 Everything is manufactured you idiot, even the carpet in the car, so are you saying if your carpet is not working, or in working order or is all ripped up you can or should be stopped for that??? You too must be a cop for trying to use some law for your agenda or how you twist the law to work for you...

    That is why cops are cowards, They are scared of video cameras and they hate the constitution... They get paid to ruin people's lives and they laugh and fist bump doing it, saying they are helping the community or protecting you... And you all praise them and call them heroes... I never known a hero who gets paid to ruin peoples lives and does it happily and goes out of their way to do it... I never seen a hero say they are helping you at the same time they abuse you... Sure there are bad people and bad people in jobs with power, it is how you deal with and use that power that says things about you... They lie to you to get you in trouble versus having actual evidence most of the time... Wither they are being told what to do or just following orders...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Did look it up and the high mount stop lamp (center brake light) is absolutely required on vehicles manufactured after September 1, 1985. It is subject to repair orders. A vehicle would fail a Maryland State Inspection if that light did not work.

      Delete
    2. You are 100% correct. I personally have been issued a repair order for the third brake light on my F250.

      Delete
  15. Since when do cops obey the law?

    ReplyDelete
  16. 954am, have another bowl of fruit loops and sign up for a refresher anger management 101 at WOR/WIC. Maybe they'll give it to you for FREE! With that attitude towards law enforcement, you will go far in life!!!

    Sheesh!

    ReplyDelete
  17. It's BRAKE light, not BREAK light.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Maybe it's a "break light" because it's broken?

      Delete
  18. 9:54 nope, has the Mitsubishi logo on it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yep, Mitsu. Must be undercover haha.

      Delete
  19. Since when do they have computers in jail. Why don't all of you cry babies stfu. You will be the first b***** crying when you need help and the police don't show up.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Big deal! I smell witch hunt!

    ReplyDelete
  21. 9:45, I am not a cop nor do I know any personally. But with your rant, I would put good money on the fact you must have not made the cut. You are a dreamer that can't pass the examine.....right? Thought so. Lol

    ReplyDelete
  22. You complainers. When a real crime has been committed people say I ain't seen nutin. But see the minor infractions on a police cruiser. Just like someone said in comments. Maybe it just went out. Dorks.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Anonymous Anonymous said...
    Curious about two things: where in Wicomico County is there a five lane road in a commercially developed area, with all those overhead signs; and, second, when did Sheriff Lewis switch from buying Tahoes to Mitsubishi Outlanders? There is also no sign of a light bar on the vehicle.

    May 26, 2017 at 9:34 AM

    You don't recognize Barr Inter. sign?

    ReplyDelete
  24. Well I learned something today.

    Maryland: Court Upholds Traffic Stop Over Third Brake Light
    Second highest court in Maryland holds driving without a third brake light is inherently unsafe.

    Third brake light
    Police in Maryland can stop and interrogate a driver if he is driving a car with a burned out third brake light. The Court of Special Appeals ruled earlier this month that allowing the car to continue with only two functional brake lights would pose a safety hazard to the public.

    The three-judge panel came to this conclusion in resolving the November 30, 2011 traffic stop of Marlon Smith in the city of Baltimore. Detective Kenneth Ramberg had been watching Smith as he walked on Darley Avenue, but he could not stop him because he was not engaged in any criminal behavior. Once Smith got in the passenger seat of a car with a broken rear deck brake light, Detective Ramberg pulled the car over.

    The detective said he smelled marijuana and ordered both of its occupants out of the car. As he started looking inside the car, he spotted a handgun that belonged to Smith. Maryland does not allow citizens to carry a firearm except in rare circumstances. Smith appealed the firearms possession conviction, arguing the initial stop was invalid because state law only requires a vehicle to have two functioning brake lights.

    "Every motor vehicle registered in this state and sold as a new vehicle after June 1, 1967, shall be equipped with at least two stop lamps," Maryland Code Section 22-206 states.

    The court countered by citing a generic statute that allows an officer to issue an "equipment repair order" if a Maryland-registered vehicle does not meet state standards. The judges then cited Code of Maryland Regulations 11.14.02.10 which instructs state vehicle inspectors to fail cars made after 1985 if they do not have a functioning third brake light.

    "Assuming arguendo that the traffic violation in this case was predicated solely on the Motor Vehicle Administration regulation, the stop was justified nonetheless on the basis that the vehicle was driven in an unsafe condition," Judge Irma S. Raker wrote for the court. "An officer is authorized to stop a vehicle that is being driven in an unsafe condition."

    The court then cited research that claims the third brake light reduces rear-end collisions, and creating a condition that increases rear-end collisions is inherently unsafe.

    "A study conducted by the NHTSA found that from 1986 to 1995, the high-mounted brake light reduced the frequency of rear impact accidents in every year the study was conducted," Raker wrote. "Therefore, even with two functioning rear brake lights, the specific safety advantages of the center high-mounted brake light demand that it function properly."

    ReplyDelete
  25. 9:54 my apologies for trying to summarize, in the future I'll be sure to explain it clearly for you maybe with pictures so you can understand it better.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Y'all that are defending the cops obviously don't pay much attention. They break so many laws on a daily basis it's ridiculous. Speeding,unsafe lane changes, no seatbelt, no turn signals, distracted driving, intimidation,lying, etc,etc. BUT.....its all good because they need to do that to protect us from criminals 🙄

    ReplyDelete
  27. Ha ha ha some of these know it all's should go and confront Sheriff Lewis....none of you have nads large enough to do that.....doesn't take much to complain on a keyboard.....LOL

    ReplyDelete
  28. 2:29 We'll obviously we know who would win that one. 🤔 Let's see the headlines: Midget sheriff pulls gun on guy for asking question. Minnie Mike finds secret compartment and finds drug stash, said he smelled it when guy was inside asking questions about one of his patrol cars. Chopper 16 on the scene of a keyboard warrior who was asking Sherriff Mikey a question when the guy answered his phone little Mike thought it was a gun and had to fire for his safety, Minnie Mike has found a secret stash with drugs and weapons hidden in the car

    ReplyDelete
  29. 2:29 aka Mike take your gun off and your ability to create false charges and see how big some of these nads are

    ReplyDelete
  30. Cop or sheriff or any law abiding citizen should be required to adhere to all laws no matter how big or small . A badge doesn't make u any less accountable for the maintenance of ur vehicle. What's good for civilians is good for officers . Every one is greatful for the job these men and women do everyday but they are not above the law

    ReplyDelete
  31. When reading comments and postings on here, I fully understand why kids today show no respect for others. Children copy what they hear. Sad

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 5:34 You give respect and you get respect. When reading your response I understand why some will just let there rights go away. Sad

      Delete
  32. Pay your bills and the law won't be after you......

    ReplyDelete
  33. 5:42 What are you talking about?

    ReplyDelete
  34. If thats a local sheriffs vehicle why does it not have L.G. tags? I think this is Bucky either running some personal errands or meeting someones wife.All in the name of 80k plus taxpayer dollars.

    ReplyDelete
  35. All of this about a brake light? Get a life.

    ReplyDelete
  36. I removed the tags lights in my police car so on night shift IDIOTS can't get my tag number when I suck by them at 100. Ha!

    ReplyDelete
  37. Someone should put the ' brakes ' on useless whining.

    ReplyDelete
  38. Brake light is working just not bright. Person taking the picture will get a ticket for using cellphone while driving...

    ReplyDelete
  39. On the way home after my overtime shift I thought of ALL YOU haters and drove my work car 105 mph. Listening to my music and laughing... if you don't like it I DONT CARE!! Some of us even drag race!! Again DONT CARE.

    ReplyDelete
  40. It is what it is. Most of us see local cops speeding for no reason, talking on their cell phones while driving. Definitely puts a stain on the ones who do their jobs as they should. Also a abuse of power.

    ReplyDelete
  41. Whoever posted this must be on the wrong side of the law.

    ReplyDelete
  42. Well if you know anything about the law MD law requires 2 working tail lights. So get a life whoever posted this.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.