Unofficial 2016 Election results for Wicomico County
Wicomico County
Question AView Question Text Local Referendum from General Assembly Chapter 169-2016 Wicomico County Board of Education - Election and Appointment of Members
Question A
Early Voting
Election Day
Absentee / Provisional
Total
Percentage
For Retaining the Current System, a Board of Education with Seven Members Appointed by the Governor
2,881
5,085
0
7,966
25.2%
For a Board of Education with Five Members Elected by District and Two Members Elected at Large
5,319
10,736
0
16,055
50.7%
For a Board of Education with Five Members Elected by District and Two Members Appointed by the Wicomico County Council
2,253
5,365
0
7,618
24.1%
Question BView Question Text Charter Amendment (Resolution 101-2016) County Council Vacancy - Special Election Charter Section 205-206
Question B
Early Voting
Election Day
Absentee / Provisional
Total
Percentage
For the Charter Amendment
7,322
15,595
0
22,917
76.5%
Against the Charter Amendment
2,597
4,453
0
7,050
23.5%
Question CView Question Text Charter Amendment (Resolution 101-2016) Submission of Appointments for Confirmation Charter Section 315
Question C
Early Voting
Election Day
Absentee / Provisional
Total
Percentage
For the Charter Amendment
6,481
13,377
0
19,858
65.9%
Against the Charter Amendment
3,481
6,801
0
10,282
34.1%
Question DView Question Text Charter Amendment (Resolution 101-2016) County Executive Vacancy - Special Election Charter Section 407
Question D
Early Voting
Election Day
Absentee / Provisional
Total
Percentage
For the Charter Amendment
7,261
15,325
0
22,586
74.8%
Against the Charter Amendment
2,720
4,871
0
7,591
25.2%
Question EView Question Text Charter Amendment (Resolution 101-2016) Temporary Absence or Disability of the County Executive Charter Section 410
Question E
Early Voting
Election Day
Absentee / Provisional
Total
Percentage
For the Charter Amendment
7,036
14,458
0
21,494
71.4%
Against the Charter Amendment
2,913
5,686
0
8,599
28.6%
Question FView Question Text Charter Amendment (Resolution 101-2016) Temporary Administrative Appointments Charter Section 414
Question F
Early Voting
Election Day
Absentee / Provisional
Total
Percentage
For the Charter Amendment
7,204
15,018
0
22,222
74.3%
Against the Charter Amendment
2,687
5,001
0
7,688
25.7%
Question GView Question Text Charter Amendment (Resolution 101-2016) Reorganization Defined Charter Section 504
Question G
Early Voting
Election Day
Absentee / Provisional
Total
Percentage
For the Charter Amendment
6,734
14,170
0
20,904
72%
Against the Charter Amendment
2,855
5,269
0
8,124
28%
Question HView Question Text Charter Amendment (Resolution 101-2016) Department of Law Charter Section 507
Question H
Early Voting
Election Day
Absentee / Provisional
Total
Percentage
For the Charter Amendment
5,919
12,362
0
18,281
62.3%
Against the Charter Amendment
3,785
7,256
0
11,041
37.7%
Question IView Question Text Charter Amendment (Resolution 101-2016) Personnel System Charter Section 601
Question I
Early Voting
Election Day
Absentee / Provisional
Total
Percentage
For the Charter Amendment
6,317
13,193
0
19,510
66.6%
Against the Charter Amendment
3,393
6,401
0
9,794
33.4%
Question JView Question Text Charter Amendment (Resolution 101-2016) Expense Budget Charter Section 705
12:16 PM I think that was the point Cannon and Co. pulled off a take over of the Executive's Job. This Council has essentially removed any power of this executive. Cannon wants to be the ruler and he will stoop to any tactic to pull it off.
This only proves how totally worthless this Council truly is.
3:40 how did they pull a "take over" of the executive's job? Please explain how these amendments removed the powers of the executive. I'll bet a nice steak dinner that you can't back up your statement with any substance, since these amendments didn't come close to doing that.
And Cannon and Co didn't do this, the voters did. Of course, you and 12:16 seem to think the voters don't know what they are doing. You know, that's what all the liberals around here say about the voters when they enacted the revenue cap. You and your liberal buddies may not think much of local voters, but I think they are smart enough to know what's going on. In this case, they were smart enough not to listen when Bob told them how to vote. Bob lost big here, and no one should think otherwise.
I like Cannon, i'm 12:16 but let's be honest. The chances of every single amendment passing all at once is ridiculously low. Hell I took my time reading and it began to blur together. Granted I voted for some and against others but I was tempted to just shade and leave. I went there to vote for Trump, nothing more. I certainly voted for Harris and the repub who lost, the lady, I forget her name.
Thank you Joe!!!! Where in the hell is WBOC with the Maryland results?
ReplyDelete9:54
ReplyDeleteGrandpa went to bed early. You are stuck with me tonight. You're welcome :)
God Bless SbyNews staff!!!!
ReplyDeleteThere goes our Revenue Cap. I guess people just don't read those amendments, they just think they should go along with them...
ReplyDeletethank you guys as usual your the only ones giving us any local news
ReplyDeleteYou're joking, right, 7:09? Did you read these amendments? Not a single one has to do with the revenue cap. The revenue cap is intact.
ReplyDeleteGuess Culver's effort to convince everyone to vote no backfired. The voters sure left him with egg on his face.
All the amendments passed and we can take from that people don't understand what they are being asked an simply vote for the change.
ReplyDelete12:16 PM I think that was the point Cannon and Co. pulled off a take over of the Executive's Job. This Council has essentially removed any power of this executive. Cannon wants to be the ruler and he will stoop to any tactic to pull it off.
ReplyDeleteThis only proves how totally worthless this Council truly is.
3:40 how did they pull a "take over" of the executive's job? Please explain how these amendments removed the powers of the executive. I'll bet a nice steak dinner that you can't back up your statement with any substance, since these amendments didn't come close to doing that.
ReplyDeleteAnd Cannon and Co didn't do this, the voters did. Of course, you and 12:16 seem to think the voters don't know what they are doing. You know, that's what all the liberals around here say about the voters when they enacted the revenue cap. You and your liberal buddies may not think much of local voters, but I think they are smart enough to know what's going on. In this case, they were smart enough not to listen when Bob told them how to vote. Bob lost big here, and no one should think otherwise.
I like Cannon, i'm 12:16 but let's be honest. The chances of every single amendment passing all at once is ridiculously low. Hell I took my time reading and it began to blur together. Granted I voted for some and against others but I was tempted to just shade and leave. I went there to vote for Trump, nothing more. I certainly voted for Harris and the repub who lost, the lady, I forget her name.
ReplyDelete