Popular Posts

Wednesday, April 02, 2014

Why Not Just Get Rid of the Immigration Law Altogether?

The former acting director of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, John Sandweg, published an op-ed this week calling, in effect, for the abolition of immigration law.

Sandweg, a criminal defense attorney and Arizona crony of Janet Napolitano, wrote in relation to President Obama’s directive that ICE reexamine enforcement policies with an eye toward making them more “humane.” To that end, he says ICE “should eliminate ‘non-criminal re-entrants and immigration fugitives’ as a priority category for deportation.”

What that means is that people who have been formally deported and then sneak back in should be exempted from further attempts at removing them, even though re-entry after deportation is a felony. Also, he wants to exempt from deportation the hundreds of thousands of illegal aliens who have been ordered deported but ignored the order and simply absconded. He says, in the obligatory “to be sure” paragraph, “To be sure, those who repeatedly cross our borders illegally or abscond from the immigration court bear culpability” — but if they’re exempt from being taken into custody and removed from the country, what does that culpability mean? It’s not like they’re going to be prosecuted, even though reentry after deportation and absconding from court are both criminal offenses.

More

2 comments:

  1. They are ALL CRIMINAL because they violated the sovereignty of OUR nation! This in turn makes them ALL FUGITIVES from justice.
    America is not Mexico!
    There are BORDERS between countries for a reason.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Absolutely not. Our laws should reflect Mexico's laws. Get caught there illegally and tell me a story. Oh, wait, you won't be able to....

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.