Popular Posts

Thursday, January 10, 2013

Sen. Richard Blumenthal Floats Ammunition Bill

Sen. Richard Blumenthal plans to introduce a bill to toughen requirements for purchasing ammunition — a response to the mass shooting last month that claimed 26 lives at Sandy Hook Elementary in Newtown, Conn.

The bill from the Connecticut Democrat, who served as the state’s attorney general, would require retailers to use an FBI database to conduct background checks on anyone who buys bullets and report to law enforcement when someone purchases more than 1,000 rounds of ammunition.

Background checks are currently only required for the sale of firearms.

“Ammunition is the black hole of gun violence prevention,” Blumenthal said on a conference call with reporters. “Felons, fugitives, domestic violence abusers, seriously mentally ill people — all are barred by law from buying ammunition and guns, but there are no checks for ammunition sales to enforce the law.”

More 

11 comments:

  1. And this will make everything all better.

    ReplyDelete
  2. one more nail in our coffin. thanks sjd

    ReplyDelete
  3. No problem. Soon we will have all the names and addresses of gun owners. We can just go and steal theirs.

    ReplyDelete
  4. this lying cheat has a lot of nerve. he wasn't really a war hero as he claimed...and won anyhow.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Watching you babies cry about getting your toys taken away has been the joy of my winter season. LULZ!

    ReplyDelete
  6. 9:05. they are not toys. They are for putting holes in tyrants!!

    ReplyDelete
  7. 9:05 your an idiot. It's not the toys everyone is in an uproar over. It's the liberties and freedom that being taken unconstitutionally.

    ReplyDelete
  8. ... whatever, still HILARIOUS!

    ReplyDelete
  9. Slowly heading toward being a fascist state... Remember Nazi Germany??

    ReplyDelete
  10. Remember this: liberty is liberty. Be it the liberty to self-defense or the liberty to ingest into your body whatever it is you choose. If you are against one, you are against them all.



    First they came for the communists,
    and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a communist.

    Then they came for the socialists,
    and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a socialist.

    Then they came for the trade unionists,
    and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a trade unionist.

    Then they came for me,
    and there was no one left to speak for me.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Trade unionists? lmao come on

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.