DelMarVa's Premier Source for News, Opinion, Analysis, and Human Interest Contact Publisher Joe Albero at alberobutzo@wmconnect.com or 410-430-5349
DelMarVa's Premier Source for News, Opinion, Analysis, and Human Interest Contact Publisher Joe Albero at alberobutzo@wmconnect.com or 410-430-5349
Proof positive that if guns are outlawed only outlaws will have guns. Md.gun laws suck!!
ReplyDeleteShame they destroy these weapons
ReplyDeletethey should auction them off with back ground checks
unfortunately, they are doing what Hitler did during Weapons confiscation. ......destroyed them
He had 3 guns? But, but there's laws that says he can't have those! That's supposed to keep us all safe. At least that's what the Dems want people to think.
ReplyDeleteA lot of "felons" have firearms but not all are violent felons. EVERYONE needs protection.
ReplyDeleteYou lose your rights to self protection when you become a felon. Just part of the penalty. Don't do the crime if...
ReplyDeleteWhat was the basis for issuing the warrant is what I want to know
ReplyDelete1240
DeletePo Po makes up reasons
oh, his actions are suspicious
If people were smart, challenges to their subjective inquiry would be thrown out in court.
Seems like the Government
we pay for
JUDGES US ALL
and tries to put labels on us for categories and files for them
we are on a very slippery slope
1st they need to disarm us
2nd they conquer and divide us....white against black , ect
..
what has saved us thus far is President Trump uncovering this shadow Government
So go file a freedom of information act request if u wanna know so bad.
DeletePossession by an unauthorized person. Should be checked by the parole officer regularly anyway...that might have been the source of the warrant!
ReplyDeleteHe lost his rights when he was convicted the first time. The fact that he was previously convicted and currently in possession would make this an easy case to prosecute and judge.
He should have axed for a deal!
Complaints from neighbors for him slinging drugs. I was on the jury.
ReplyDelete"He lost his rights when he was convicted the first time. The fact that he was previously convicted and currently in possession would make this an easy case to prosecute and judge."
ReplyDeleteAs a juror we did not know his priors or that he was on parole. His defense was basically the dog ate my homework. He was in a room with openly displayed loaded weapons.
I was not selected to serve on that jury - but was waiting for a few specific pieces of evidence...proper warrant,evidence of the previous conviction, and testimony of the actual presence of the weapons in his possession/presence/residence. All factual items that have nothing to do with the 'factors' that are questioned.....
ReplyDeleteProper warrants are overseen by a judge.
DeleteThe fact that he had been previously convicted would be pertinent to show that he was not authorized to possess. If that was kept from the jury - they could have acquitted...
ReplyDeleteIt was agreed to by both sides and not contested that he was not allowed to possess
Delete@9:37 No, you don't lose your constitutional rights when you become a felon. That's unconstitutional statutory law. But don't worry because that same unconstitutional statutory law you love to use as a whip is coming to take your guns too, soon. Remember as you cry out about unconstitutional processes that statutory law in your very own eyes was legitimate.
ReplyDeleteYou lose your 2nd amendment rights. Otherwise there would have been no charges.
DeleteTell that to the counties in Virginia thst have become sanctuary for gun owners.
DeleteAnonymous Anonymous said...
ReplyDeleteYou lose your rights to self protection when you become a felon. Just part of the penalty. Don't do the crime if...
December 17, 2019 at 9:37 PM
No, you do NOT. What you meant to say was you lose your 2nd Amendment right when convicted of a felony, ANY felony. Like having in your possession a FISH that is 'protected', and other such nonsense. And felons can and do get their 2nd Amendment right back after they serve their sentence.
If you think 'felons' don't still possess firearms, for whatever reason you are naive. I can understand why people wouldn't want violent offenders or mentally unstable people from having a firearm in the name of 'safety' but they also use this action and others as a means to disable people, which is what they have always wanted.
If you can't see that, especially with the way things are headed, i.e. Virginia, 'they' have succeeded with you.