1204 seems to infer that the police vehicle is at fault, in a rear end collision near an intersection controlled by a light. Hate to ruin his day, but...
12:30 PM - No, 12:04 didn't infer that the police vehicle was at fault. It should have been taken that the driver of vehicle 2 was either tailgating, driving too fast or driving distracted (as in looking at a cellphone, etc.) No driver is responsible for the moving traffic to his or her rear, all other things being equal and legal.
Doh!
ReplyDeleteWe all know whose fault it was. Will a cellphone ticket be issued too?
ReplyDelete1204 seems to infer that the police vehicle is at fault, in a rear end collision near an intersection controlled by a light. Hate to ruin his day, but...
ReplyDeleteRuh roh
ReplyDeleteEither way no matter who’s fault it is, Barbs will find a way to get her enforcers to take some comp hours away the officer.
ReplyDeleteBabs will find a safe space for the officer while she completes the paperwork for them to collect 66 2/3.
Delete12:30 PM - No, 12:04 didn't infer that the police vehicle was at fault. It should have been taken that the driver of vehicle 2 was either tailgating, driving too fast or driving distracted (as in looking at a cellphone, etc.) No driver is responsible for the moving traffic to his or her rear, all other things being equal and legal.
ReplyDeleteMan, it sucks to be them.
ReplyDeleteI saw that SUV earlier today. Knowing SBYPD they will just leave it like that.
ReplyDelete