Popular Posts

Saturday, December 08, 2018

Federal Judge Rips State Department for Helping to Bury Hillary's Email Scandal

A federal judge ripped the State Department during a court hearing this week and accused officials there of helping to cover up former Secretary Hillary Clinton's unlawful use of a private email server. The judge also took aim at the current Department of Justice.

From Judicial Watch (bolding is mine):

Judicial Watch announced today that, in a ruling excoriating both the U.S. Departments of State and Justice, U.S. District Court Judge Royce C. Lamberth has ordered both agencies to join Judicial Watch in submitting a proposed schedule for discovery into whether Hillary Clinton sought to evade the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) by using a private email system and whether the State Department acted in “bad faith” by failing to disclose knowledge of the email system. The decision comes in a FOIA lawsuit related to the Benghazi terrorist attack.

Terming Clinton’s use of her private email system, “one of the gravest modern offenses to government transparency,” Lamberth wrote in his MEMORANDUM OPINION:

… his [President Barack Obama’s] State and Justice Departments fell far short. So far short that the court questions, even now, whether they are acting in good faith. Did Hillary Clinton use her private email as Secretary of State to thwart this lofty goal [Obama announced standard for transparency]? Was the State Department’s attempt to settle this FOIA case in 2014 an effort to avoid searching – and disclosing the existence of – Clinton’s missing emails? And has State ever adequately searched for records in this case?

At best, State’s attempt to pass-off its deficient search as legally adequate during settlement negotiations was negligence born out of incompetence.At worst, career employees in the State and Justice Departments colluded to scuttle public scrutiny of Clinton, skirt FOIA, and hoodwink this Court.

Lambert accused DOJ attorneys of "double speak" and "misleading" the court on the same issue.

More

3 comments:

  1. They are crooks. Period. Lock them up.

    ReplyDelete
  2. They need to jump on her with both feet. I would love to see that woman in handcuffs. A message needs to be passed on to those crooks. That WE the people have had enough of them.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I just do not know what it is about this biotch that people would risk their jobs, their careers, their freedom to protect her. What is it that makes the afraid of her?

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.