Popular Posts

Saturday, May 19, 2018

The Cultural Shift Against Free Speech

At first, Twitter seemed like a great idea: quickly and concisely communicating our thoughts with just a few keystrokes, rather than babbling on and on. Still, something didn’t seem quite right about that 140-character limitation, even when it was doubled to 280 characters last year. Somehow, it still seemed a restriction on our speech.

But that was just the beginning. This simple social media platform is now going far beyond limiting our character-count to controlling what we think and how we interact with our fellow citizens.

One of the core problems created by social media behemoths like Twitter and Facebook is not that their policies are posing any serious legal threat to the First Amendment. As David French writes at National Review, “The law of free speech has mainly improved. Americans might have more legal defenses against government censorship now than they ever have before. If the government moves against your speech based on your viewpoint and you fight back, you’re likely to win.”

But social media platforms can bypass the Constitution altogether by creating a paradigm shift in the way current and future generations understand the important role free speech plays in our society. French adds, “The culture of free speech has decayed. Individuals and organizations are far more sensitive and far less tolerant of dissent than they were even in the recent past.”

More

1 comment:

  1. This is the truth. Nancy Pelosi is a malfunctioning cybernetic organism? Watch her malfunctioning facial spasms, "brain" (computer chip, Made in China?) cramps, forgotten (memory erased) pre-scripted refrains repeated over and over. She isn't crazy, but it's possible her implants need refurbishing.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.