A professor at Purdue University argued that images of aborted babies constitute “child pornography” in a recent debate over abortion rights.
Professor David Sanders, an associate professor of Biology at Purdue University, accusedpro-lifers who use images of aborted fetuses of participating in “child pornography” activities.
Sanders remarks begin at 38:00.
More/Video
Perdue have u lost ur Gn Mind ?
ReplyDeleteBut wait...according to the liberals, they aren't babies!!!!
ReplyDelete12:13 Awesome reply!
ReplyDeleteAnd the assistant prof. of BIOLOGY, probably teaches that psychological gender identity is more accurate than biological gender. He is a flake. His teaching credentials should be rescinded.
ReplyDeleteBy definition, it can only be child pornography if the pictures are of children. Ergo, he agrees that abortion is murder of children, as children are living beings. He is so dumb that he doesn't realize that he supports pro-lifers with that ridiculous assertion.
ReplyDeleteIs he any relation to "The Bern"? Birds of a feather...
ReplyDeleteWas the image of the dead child washed up on the European shore of the Mediterranean Sea child porn?
ReplyDeleteHow about My Lai? Was that photo child porn??
That award winning photo of the naked Vietnamese girl running from the napalm attack was definitely child pornography (naked image), yet it was plastered on the cover of Newsweek, Time, and every other anti-war publication of the time. Still can be viewed online, if you're into that kind of thing.
ReplyDelete