Goal has jumped from $2.2 million to $9.5 million in past week
Green Party presidential candidate Jill Stein has yet again raised the fundraising goal for an attempted vote recount in three battleground states and is currently seeking $9.5 million for the effort.
Stein, who first called for recounts in Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, and Michigan on Nov. 23, initially sought $2.2 million for the effort. Once the goal was met, Stein increased the amount to $4.5 million. Shortly after, Stein said the total costs would hit $7 million. Stein has since upped the goal to $9.5 million.
“We need your help to stand up to the powerful forces trying to block our recount campaign for citizen democracy,” Stein’s fundraising page states. “We received word yesterday that the final estimate for the filing fee for the recount in Wisconsin is $3.5 million—an outrageous cost increase from the initial estimate of $1.1 million that was given to us by WI state elections officials based on the last statewide recount. But thanks to over 130,000 small donors like you, we have enough money in hand to pay this fee and move forward with the recount!”
“But because of this exorbitant fee increase—bringing the total money required for recounts in all three states to $9.5 million—we need your help. We’re not there yet, and we need every last penny to reach the $9.5 million benchmark.”
Stein has said that excess funds would go toward “election integrity efforts” and to promote “voting system reform.”
Marc Elias, Hillary Clinton’s top campaign lawyer and partner at the Washington, D.C.-based law firm Perkins Coie, has been the go-to lawyer in challenging voter identification laws in a number of states with Republican-dominated legislatures.
Elias’ efforts were bankrolled by millions of dollars from liberal billionaire George Soros.
More here
Hey let's suck up some liberal dollars for a waste of time. I don't mind it's good for the economy.
ReplyDeleteI love it . . . spend those left-wing dollars on something with zero value! Keeps socialist money away from the next election ;)
ReplyDeleteRe-count away!
If this ludicrous "investment" of Dem donor money is indicative of how Hillary would have run the government with everyone's money, then we can breathe a small sigh of relief.
ReplyDelete