 |
| Ed Klein |
An October Surprise unlike one we've ever seen in our lifetime!!!!
It seems from the new book, Guilty As Sin, author and close Democrat confidant, Edward Klein has just blown the lid off the whole Clinton Email Scandal in the most audacious manner!
In the book releasing TODAY! Klein illustrates Obama didn't want Clinton to be the nominee at all. In fact, he wanted Joe Biden and Elizabeth Warren to run against Hillary Clinton but both declined after private meetings. Klein cites his sources close to Valerie Jarrett (Obama's Right Hand) that once she cheated her way to the nomination, he was forced to back her against his will.
Regarding the Comey factor, Klein reveals FBI Director James Comey was promised the new FBI headquarters would be named the James Comey Building - hence, he was bribed to throw the investigation. This explains his provocative falsehoods and denials during all the hearings before both the Senate and Congress! He was covering his complicity in this ruse and seeking to hide the corrupt underpinnings within, which has now led to both Houses contemplating what to do next because the facts are so blatant felonious violations.
Also, last week, it was revealed that Attorney General Loretta Lynch is on Clinton's short list for the Supreme Court should she win the White House. Yes, the same AG who threatens prosecution to anyone who bad mouths global warming -- the same one who wants to take away your First and Second Amendment rights as guaranteed by our Constitution.
No longer is this about partisan politics! DC has now been outed as the incubus of pure corruption at the hands of the Clinton Crime family and top Democrat officials within the party!
It's time their reign come to a swift end!
Holy smokes! Wow. Just wow.
ReplyDeleteI expect to see his obituary due to an accident or suicide by stabbing himself in the back. The body count keeps rising.
ReplyDeleteIt's them or us. You decide.
ReplyDeleteSee if you can find a single verifiable source in Klein's latest work of fiction.
ReplyDelete1113 you have NO clue what you're talking about. Once again another democrat so blinded by his/her own dogma. Just pathetic. You buy the smear job and then don't understand why America is a frigging mess. WAKE UP IDIOT! WAKE UP! You make yourself look like a moron. If you don't like this country, get the hell out of it.
ReplyDeleteThe Videos say she's got serious health problems. Do we really want Tim Kaine to be president? The guy's a hot mess.
ReplyDeletePeople like 11:13 just shows how stupid some people are now days. They don't seem to understand Rome is burning because they're too busy sling mud based in ideology instead of seeing things as they are. Just ridiculous how moronic people are. That person will never wake up. Their ignorance is too hard to ignore.
ReplyDeleteAnonymous Anonymous said...
ReplyDeleteSee if you can find a single verifiable source in Klein's latest work of fiction.
October 4, 2016 at 11:13 AM
I was ready to bash 1113 also until I took his suggestion and did a google search. Here is what I found:
Criticism[edit]
Klein has been criticized for his biography of Hillary Clinton, titled, The Truth About Hillary: What She Knew, When She Knew It, and How Far She'll Go to Become President, which was released on June 21, 2005. Politico criticized the book for "serious factual errors, truncated and distorted quotes and overall themes [that] don't gibe with any other serious accounts of Clinton's life."[9] The book was attacked not only by liberals, but by a neoconservative as well. John Podhoretz wrote in the New York Post, "Thirty pages into it, I wanted to take a shower. Sixty pages into it, I wanted to be decontaminated. And 200 pages into it, I wanted someone to drive stakes through my eyes so I wouldn't have to suffer through another word."[10] In National Review James Geraghty wrote, “Folks, there are plenty of arguments against Hillary Clinton, her policies, her views, her proposals, and her philosophies. This stuff ain’t it. Nobody on the right, left, or center ought to stoop to this level.”[11]
Kathryn Jean Lopez of National Review asked Klein in a June 20, 2005 interview, "Why on earth would you put such a terrible story in your book...that looks to be flimsily sourced at that?," regarding his suggestion that Chelsea Clinton was conceived in an act of marital rape.[12] Facing criticism from both the left and right for making the claim, Klein eventually backed away from the insinuation in an interview with radio host Jim Bohannon on June 23, 2005[13]
The British newspaper The Guardian pointed out a number of verifiable factual errors in Klein's 2014 book Blood Feud.[14]
Questions of credibility of sources in work[edit]
Klein has also come under fire for his use of anonymous quotes, purported to be from the subjects of his books, which he claims he received from anonymous insiders. The credibility of such quotes has been questioned by writers such as Joe Conason,[15] Salon's Simon Malloy [16] and conservative commentators Rush Limbaugh[17] and Peggy Noonan.[18] "Some of the quotes strike me as odd, in the sense that I don't know people who speak this way," Limbaugh said of Klein's work, describing the sources as "grade school chatter."
As much as I would like to believe Ed Klein it is hard to do so with no sources.
We all know this is corruption at the highest levels of our government from those appointed by Obama, which makes him just as complicit in it, we can only hope and pray our congress steps in and does the right thing election or not!
ReplyDelete104 Laughable. The Guardian is a left - leaning publication. If you bothered to really check YOUR sources you'd find that out in a quick hurry. Second, his sources included people working directly with Valerie Jarrett. Do you have a clue of who that is? Maybe you should get out your handy dandy smartphone and check her out. Sounds to me like you don't want to believe what's smacking you in the head. Enjoy the ignorance.
ReplyDelete104 also while you're searching the internet why don't you google Comey and Clinton Foundation connection. Think you might find some interesting reading if you really have a passion for being informed.
ReplyDeleteMore interesting info in Jerome Corsi's book on the Clinton Foundation too: http://www.wnd.com/2016/07/clinton-foundation-is-criminal-operation-charges-author/
ReplyDeleteThere is so much proof against Hillary and the Clinton machine , it really worries me that she hasn't been arrested . If this hasn't happened now , will it ever and why?
ReplyDeleteAnonymous Anonymous said...
ReplyDelete104 Laughable. The Guardian is a left - leaning publication. If you bothered to really check YOUR sources you'd find that out in a quick hurry. Second, his sources included people working directly with Valerie Jarrett. Do you have a clue of who that is? Maybe you should get out your handy dandy smartphone and check her out. Sounds to me like you don't want to believe what's smacking you in the head. Enjoy the ignorance.
October 4, 2016 at 1:33 PM
I have no idea why you would mention the Guardian. The words I posted came from Wikipedia. If you disagree with them or think they are wrong they do allow for corrections. Maybe you should visit them and offer your wisdom if you think it is superior to theirs.
Klein STATED who his sources were but that is not verifiable. That would be the same as me stating you are a moron but having no mental evaluations to back up my claim.
And finally, you don't know what I believe, or anyone else for that matter. The point that 1113 was getting at was about VERIFIABLE sources, not whether anyone believed Klien's book or not.
I realize people in this area have a problem differentiating between certain things, which I BELIEVE you have done. Oh, and some of us still use a computer, not a smartphone.
P.S. Here are some tidbits from Proverbs for you and a couple of others. Enjoy the wisdom.
9:7 He who corrects a mocker invites insult.
He who reproves a wicked man invites abuse.
9:8 Don’t reprove a scoffer, lest he hate you.
Reprove a wise man, and he will love you.
9:9 Instruct a wise man, and he will be still wiser.
Teach a righteous man, and he will increase in learning.
19:25 Flog a scoffer, and the simple will learn prudence;
Rebuke one who has understanding, and he will gain knowledge.
13:18 Poverty and shame come to him who refuses discipline,
But he who heeds correction shall be honored.
15:10 There is stern discipline for one who forsakes the way:
Whoever hates reproof shall die.
15:12 A scoffer doesn’t love to be reproved; He will not go to the wise.
17:10 A rebuke enters deeper into one who has understanding
Than a hundred lashes into a fool.
12:1 Whoever loves correction loves knowledge,
But he who hates reproof is stupid.
A prudent man concealeth knowledge: but the heart of fools proclaimeth foolishness.
You really think that sources will talk on record for the kind of stuff that Klein exposed?! Okay. That's smart. If I could be killed by the Clintons and someone wanted me to go on record I'd do it. Are you really that naive? 🙄🙄😂😂😂
DeleteDon't you just love democrats and their flawed thought chains. Clinton body count up to 60+ and 224 thinks people are going to want their names attached when bringing down scoundrels. 🤔
DeleteThey can be verified when the case goes to trial and they're already in witness protection program.
ReplyDeleteAnonymous Anonymous said...
ReplyDeleteThey can be verified when the case goes to trial and they're already in witness protection program.
October 4, 2016 at 5:38 PM
lol CSI fan huh?
Anonymous Anonymous said...
ReplyDeleteDon't you just love democrats and their flawed thought chains. Clinton body count up to 60+ and 224 thinks people are going to want their names attached when bringing down scoundrels. 🤔
October 4, 2016 at 5:37 PM
Sorry, I was thinking in terms of proving something in a court of law, not public opinion. People can say whatever they want, but in order to PROVE something other rules apply. You just can't see the forest for the trees I guess.
I think that what you published made a lot of sense. However, think about this, suppose you added
ReplyDeletea little information? I ain't suggesting your information isn't good., however suppose you added a post title to possibly grab people's attention? I
mean "BREAKING: Top Democrats & Clinton Thwart Justice!" is a
little vanilla. You should look at Yahoo's home page and see how they
create post titles to get people interested. You might add a related video or a related pic or two
to get readers excited about what you've written. In my opinion, it would make your posts a little bit more interesting.