Popular Posts

▼

Friday, July 15, 2016

Loretta Lynch Refuses to Say Whether It’s Illegal to Lie Under Oath

at

11 comments:

  1. AnonymousJuly 15, 2016 at 1:53 PM

    The libs have lied so much they find it difficult to tell the truth.

    ReplyDelete
  2. AnonymousJuly 15, 2016 at 1:57 PM

    Is that (Hon) for 'Honorable' or 'Honey'? Just curious

    ReplyDelete
  3. AnonymousJuly 15, 2016 at 2:12 PM

    Um, lying under oath is perjury and can get a person jail time.
    Not rocket science!!!

    ReplyDelete
  4. AnonymousJuly 15, 2016 at 2:48 PM

    They really feel untouchable. These sickos are subverting reality and law

    ReplyDelete
  5. AnonymousJuly 15, 2016 at 3:38 PM

    Get them out of office and then lock up all those who have obviously broken laws.

    ReplyDelete
  6. AnonymousJuly 15, 2016 at 3:42 PM

    So, sometimes, Ms. Lynch, lying is acceptable, given certain circumstances?
    This was a yes/no question. You couldn't rise to some level of decency and answer it, rather than dance around it?

    ReplyDelete
  7. AnonymousJuly 15, 2016 at 4:01 PM

    A simple yes or no is not in their vocabulary. I watch them on TV and the questioner does everything but beat it out of them and the person answering talks so long the subject gets changed. Amazing indeed......

    ReplyDelete
  8. AnonymousJuly 15, 2016 at 4:53 PM

    Congress has no jurisdiction in a military dictatorship.
    She does not have to answer any of their questions.

    ReplyDelete
  9. steveJuly 15, 2016 at 6:58 PM

    If she can't figure this one out then she doesn't need to be our attorney general or an attorney in anyone's book

    ReplyDelete
  10. AnonymousJuly 15, 2016 at 8:30 PM

    She is NOT qualified to be a crossing guard for a one way sidewalk.

    ReplyDelete
  11. AnonymousJuly 16, 2016 at 5:33 AM

    Maybe she doesn't know the answer.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.