Popular Posts

▼

Sunday, May 08, 2016

Salisbury University Crime Statistics 2015

Salisbury University Crime Statistics 2015

This report contains statistics for the previous three calendar years regarding crimes that occurred on campus; in certain off-campus buildings or property owned or controlled by the university and on public property within or immediately adjacent to and accessible to the campus.
This is a long report click READ MORE below to see the entire report

SALISBURY UNIVERSITY CLERY ACT STATISTICS 
  CRIME REPORTS
OFFENSE
LOCATION
2012
2013
2014
Murder/Non-Negligent Manslaughter
On Campus
0
0
0
Residence Halls*
0
0
0
Non-Campus Buildings/Properties
0
0
0
Public Property Next to Campus
0
0
0
 Negligent Manslaughter
On Campus
0
0
0
Residence Halls*
0
0
0
Non-Campus Buildings/Properties
0
0
0
Public Property Next to Campus
0
0
0
 Sex Offense: Forcible2
On Campus1
6
3
n/a
Residence Halls*
4
3
n/a
Non-Campus Buildings/Properties
0
0
n/a
Public Property Next to Campus
0
0
n/a
Sex Offense: Non-Forcible2
On Campus
0
0
n/a
Residence Halls*
0
0
n/a
Non-Campus Buildings/Properties
0
0
n/a
Public Property Next to Campus
0
0
n/a
 Rape(2) (3)
On Campus
n/a
n/a
3
Residence Halls*
n/a
n/a
3
Non-Campus Buildings/Properties
n/a
n/a
0
Public Property Next to Campus
n/a
n/a
0
Fondling(2)
On Campus
n/a
n/a
1
Residence Halls*
n/a
n/a
1
Non-Campus Buildings/Properties
n/a
n/a
0
Public Property Next to Campus
n/a
n/a
0
Incest2
On Campus
n/a
n/a
0
Residence Halls*
n/a
n/a
0
Non-Campus Buildings/Properties
n/a
n/a
0
Public Property Next to Campus
n/a
n/a
0
Statutory Rape2
On Campus
n/a
n/a
0
Residence Halls*
n/a
n/a
0
Non-Campus Buildings/Properties
n/a
n/a
0
Public Property Next to Campus
n/a
n/a
0
 Robbery
On Campus1
2 
1
0
Residence Halls*
1
0
0
Non-Campus Buildings/Properties
0
0
0
Public Property Next to Campus
1
1
1
 Aggravated Assault
On Campus1
2
2
2
Residence Halls*
2
1
0
Non-Campus Buildings/Properties
0
0
0
Public Property Next to Campus
0
0
0
 Burglary
On Campus1
5
4
3
Residence Halls*
2
4
2
Non-Campus Buildings/Properties
0
0
0
Public Property Next to Campus
0
0
0
 Motor Vehicle Theft
On Campus
0
2
1
Residence Halls*
0
0
0
Non-Campus Buildings/Properties
0
0
0
Public Property Next to Campus
0
0
0
 Arson
On Campus
0
0
0
Residence Halls*
0
0
0
Non-Campus Buildings/Properties
0
0
0
Public Property Next to Campus
0
0
0
 Domestic Violence4
On Campus
n/a
1
0
Residence Halls*
n/a
0
0
Non-Campus Buildings/Properties
n/a
0
0
Public Property Next to Campus
n/a
0
0
 Dating Violence4
On Campus
n/a
0
4
Residence Halls*
n/a
0
2
Non-Campus Buildings/Properties
n/a
0
0
Public Property Next to Campus
n/a
0
0
 Stalking(3) (4)
On Campus
n/a
1
4
Residence Halls*
n/a
0
2
Non-Campus Buildings/Properties
n/a
0
0
Public Property Next to Campus
n/a
0
1
 Hate Crimes5
On Campus
0
0
0
Residence Halls*
0
0
0
Non-Campus Buildings/Properties
0
0
0
Public Property Next to Campus
0
0
0
ALCOHOL, DRUG,   AND WEAPONS VIOLATIONS
Arrests
 Location
 2012
 2013
 2014
 Liquor Law Arrests6
On Campus
33
0
0
Residence Hall*
22
0
0
Non-Campus Buildings/Properties
0
0
0
Public Property Next to Campus
22
10
0
 Drug Law Arrests7
On Campus
6
18
31
Residence Hall*
4
15
16
Non-Campus Buildings/Properties
0
0
0
Public Property Next to Campus
2
2
5
 Illegal Weapons Possessions
On Campus
0
0
0
Residence Hall*
0
0
0
Non-Campus Buildings/Properties
0
0
0
Public Property Next to Campus
0
0
0
Number of People   Referred to University Judicial System
 Location
 2012
 2013
2014
 Liquor Law Violations
On Campus
325
316
407
Residence Hall*
322
316
398
Non-Campus Buildings/Properties
0
0
0
Public Property Next to Campus
0
0
1
 Drug Law Violations
On Campus
16
33
70
Residence Hall*
12
26
66
Non-Campus Buildings/Properties
0
0
0
Public Property Next to Campus
0
0
0
 Illegal Weapons Possessions
On Campus
0
4
0
Residence Hall*
0
2
0
Non-Campus Buildings/Properties
0
0
0
Public Property Next to Campus
0
0
0
*Crimes reported in residence halls are included in “on campus” totals.
Footnotes:
  1. In 2012 the following on campus incidents were cleared by arrest or exceptional means: six forcible sex offenses, one robbery, two aggravated assaults and two burglaries.
  2. The statistical categories for sex offenses have changed. Sexual offenses are now categorized as rape, fondling, incest and   statutory rape.  NOTE: Sodomy and sexual assault with an object are included in the rape category.
  3. In 2014 five incidents of rape were reported; however, two incidents were cleared as unfounded.  In addition, seven reports   of stalking were reported; however, two incidents were cleared as unfounded.
  4. This category was new for reporting in 2013. Statistics for this crime were not collected for 2012.
  5. Hate crimes are crimes that manifest evidence that the victim was intentionally selected because of the victim’s actual or perceived Race (RA), Religion (RE), Sexual Orientation (SO), Gender (G), Ethnicity (E), National Origin (NO) or Disability (D).  Reportable hate offense crime categories include all of the aforementioned crime offenses as well as larceny/theft, simple assault, intimidation and vandalism/malicious destruction of property.
  6. Due to clarification of the reporting guidelines, the 2013 and 2014 information listed in this category has been adjusted to meet the required reporting standards. 
  7. Note:  The Maryland General Assembly passed Senate bill 364 which reclassified the use or possession of 10 grams or less of marijuana to a civil offense (fine not exceeding $100 for first-time offenders, $250 for second-time offenders, and $500 for third or subsequent offenders) rather than a criminal offense.  The decriminalization law took effect October 1, 2014.
at

17 comments:

  1. AnonymousMay 2, 2016 at 9:42 AM

    Skewed reporting. Sure are an awful lot of "n/a" too. Gotta keep the stats clean so the money for the machine doesn't stop flowing.

    ReplyDelete
  2. AnonymousMay 2, 2016 at 10:05 AM

    It's actually not as bad as I thought.....if the numbers are accurate.

    ReplyDelete
  3. AnonymousMay 2, 2016 at 11:02 AM

    Thats the thing...they arent accurate, and everyone knows it.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Conceerned RetireeMay 2, 2016 at 11:02 AM

    I believe these stats when hell freezes over. Those N/A's are pure cover-ups. They are trying to say there were no sexual crimes. These College educated "idiots" wants the Public to believe this BS. Who is covering this up? If Campus Police do not want to take responsibility and blame it on President "Do little", then they are assisting in the cover-up and aiding the perpetrators in committing crimes along with President "Do Little". I ask again who is so stupid to believe the stats on sex crimes concerning College Ladies are N/A, Not Applicable? They all should be fired ASAP.

    ReplyDelete
  5. WE THE PEOPLEMay 2, 2016 at 12:34 PM

    Agreed, (9:42) there are a lot of "n/a" on the board. Another fine bit of paperwork from the very amateur campus police. Keeping the stats clean for the donors dollars.

    ReplyDelete
  6. WE THE PEOPLEMay 2, 2016 at 12:37 PM

    Please note the explanation of a hate crime and apply it to the incident in the Blackwell Library

    ReplyDelete
  7. retired copMay 2, 2016 at 12:38 PM

    I used to be one of SU's cops, we were told to try and talk the victim out of filing a full report. If they insisted, then we rewrote it and made it look better for the university. It is all about appearance and the money.

    ReplyDelete
  8. AnonymousMay 2, 2016 at 3:03 PM

    It looks to me as if most of their force is made up of ex-Fruitland cops.

    ReplyDelete
  9. AnonymousMay 2, 2016 at 3:53 PM

    The "Keystone Cops" used to be the same as Building Security. They cried and the Unions got them reclassified to sworn Police Officers. They do not enforce laws unless it benefits them in some way. A lot of them were in Towns and seen they could get called Police and not work. That is why they went to Campus Police, since they would not have dangerous working conditions and still act important.

    ReplyDelete
  10. AnonymousMay 2, 2016 at 3:56 PM

    The Parents of future Students ought to look at these crime stats and understand what they are reading and use common sense, CS. They should see right thru this BS, falsified reports.

    ReplyDelete
  11. AnonymousMay 2, 2016 at 5:29 PM



    3:53

    It is obvious that you are in the dark on each sentence so I will start with one remark to quell all of your said knowledge.
    Maryland Police Commission requires that law enforcement officers are trained and qualify to enforce Md laws. The "union" has nothing to do with requirements of a law enforcement officer or institution. It is not mandated for a LEO to belong to a "union".
    Sorry that you didn't qualify to be one of Maryland's finest Keystones.

    ReplyDelete
  12. AnonymousMay 2, 2016 at 6:04 PM

    The only truth I see is your 1 sentence about the Maryland Police Commission. Yes I went through the Academy with flying colors and was certified. You Don't know what is the truth. I retired from the Criminal Justice System. Yes I was very active in the Unions when MCEA fought for 5 years to get the University Police reclassified using University of MD as and example after they won their reclass. I believe that was around 1985 give or take. So I am not in the dark.

    ReplyDelete
  13. AnonymousMay 2, 2016 at 6:04 PM

    Agree with 529... people are quick to talk down on law enforcement officers these days!

    ReplyDelete
  14. AnonymousMay 2, 2016 at 7:04 PM

    604. Glad to see you retired and disrespect other officers. So happy for your flying colors in the academy, applause please...

    ReplyDelete
  15. AnonymousMay 2, 2016 at 7:30 PM

    6:04 My last comment. When I was in changing facts of a report to make someone look good was falsifying a report. Also you did not try an coerce a witness or accuser to not pursue a criminal act. That is not disrespect. That was a "Bad COP". Because the straight facts is the only thing that went in an accurate report no matter who looked bad / good. That must not be taught in the Academies now. Sorry if anybody was offended with facts.

    ReplyDelete
  16. AnonymousMay 2, 2016 at 9:09 PM

    Well its a shame if one "bad cop" causes a generalization of the department and current officers...

    ReplyDelete
  17. AnonymousMay 3, 2016 at 7:45 AM


    I am happy for you and delighted you made it through the CJA with honors.
    Being so defensive makes me wonder if you were just disappointed you didn't make it at the top of the class as many SU officers did through the years.
    That is a fact and the records show it.
    Don't know if you tried out for the Keystones and got cut, just appears or reflects same in those statements.
    Thank you for the service to the community and be careful out there in the dark.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.