Popular Posts

Tuesday, March 01, 2016

A Letter to Editor 3-1-16

Editor:

Are you aware that the MD General Assembly is currently in session? Included in this year’s crop of mandaters are Democrat Delegates Angel, Cullison, and Pena-Melnyk who have introduced HB1178 “Requiring the Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, in cooperation with the State Board of Education and the Statewide Advisory Commission on Immunizations, to adopt regulations requiring that before a child enters ninth grade, the child has received a specified number of doses of human papillomavirus vaccine” .
These Democrat delegates purport themselves to be champions of LGBT rights, social justice and Planned Parenthood’s slogan of “A woman’s right to choose”, NOT so much for a family’s right to choose. The proposed legislation is nonsexist and therefore requires all children to suffer an unknown number of doses of such a vaccine. 

Do you have children, grandchildren, nieces and/or nephews? Are you aware that the American College of Pediatrics has published a report detailing its concerns with this vaccine? (http://www.acpeds.org/the-college-speaks/positionstatements/health-issues/new-concerns-about-the-human-papillomavirusvaccine)

I have requested my elected representatives to let me know what their positions are on this mandate, but have received no replies. 

Does anyone besides me remember THALIDOMIDE? 

Sincerely, 

Gwen L. Cordner

10 comments:

  1. Not sure what target you were aiming for...from the ACPEDS website:
    "February 1, 2016. CLARIFICATION: This newly released statement entitled “New Concerns about the Human Papillomavirus Vaccine” is a call for more research into any possible association between HPV vaccines and ovarian dysfunction, including the rare condition of premature ovarian failure (POF). This is NOT a call to abandon HPV vaccination. The American College of Pediatricians is a pro-vaccine organization. Until such an association is proven to be causation, we continue to recommend that the HPV vaccine be offered to adolescent patients as a form of proven protection. As with all vaccines and any medical treatment, parents and patients deserve to be informed of all known risks and benefits."

    ReplyDelete
  2. Unlike most diseases that we vaccinate against, HPV is an STD. I see no reason why this needs to be mandated.

    ReplyDelete
  3. My point is why are politicians requiring children to be injected with chemicals that are not thoroughly researched?

    ReplyDelete
  4. College Opposes Mandatory Humanpapilloma Virus (HPV) Vaccination

    by Lisa on January 12, 2007 in Press Release


    Gainesville, Florida January 12, 2007 –The American College of Pediatricians applauds the availability of HPV vaccine. We strongly oppose requiring students to obtain the Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) vaccine as a requirement for public school attendance

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous said...
    My point is why are politicians requiring children to be injected with chemicals that are not thoroughly researched?

    Because you live in a nanny liberal state. Seems ironic that you are worried about chemicals being injected in the children yet the eastern shore has the highest percentage of smokers in the state and daily you see people smoking in their cars with children strapped in car seats being forced to inhale cigarette smoke.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Anytime a government 'requires' us to take some sort of medicine it 'requires' us to question why. How safe is it, what is it controlling, does the need out way the consequences, who's brother-in-law is selling it to the state and many, many more questions need answers.
    Need I remind you that right here on SbyNews an article (Feb. 29, 2016; http://sbynews.blogspot.com/2016/02/doctors-who-discovered-cancer-enzymes.html ) exposed that all of the doctors who discovered cancer enzymes were being added to vaccines have been found murdered. Why do you suppose that is? Why do you think these doctors were taken out? Because of something they knew..?
    Again, when your government 'requires' a vaccine they need more proof of necessity then these Annapolis clowns are giving or, IMHO, will be able to.

    ReplyDelete
  7. This isn't the ONLY vaccine that is very questionable. I'm totally against the dosage, the quality of these vaccines and the necessity of ALL the vaccines they want to mandate. We need to step back and really take a real look at what's happening with our children who obviously are having a bad time (some life changing and deadly) with these vaccines.

    ReplyDelete
  8. The bottom line is I lost my ability to have children due to a cheating partner. So had I had the opportunity to have a vaccine instead of cancer Obviously I would chose to have the vaccine. I'm married now and my husband and I would give anything to be able to have children.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Actually if you do some research, the whole campaign was pushed and funded by big pharma

    It has nothing to do with protecting children and everything to do with money.
    They do not give a rats behind the ramifications of what happens 10+ years from now to the children..

    Follow the money and you will find big phara behind this.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Update: Delegate Carozza has stated that she opposes this legislation.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.