This is pure claptrap. Everyone understands that the West is not at war with Islam broadly, and that an overwhelming percentage of Muslims reject violent extremism. It's been beaten into our heads by politicians of all stripes since 9/11, and we're generally bright enough to draw the relevant distinction: "These Muslims over here are just peaceful, faithful people living their lives, whereas those Muslims over there are radical and seek to impose a toxic strain of their faith via terror and violence. We have no quarrel with the former group, which thankfully represents the large majority; the latter group must be confronted and defeated." This dynamic isn't hard. It can be quickly and easily explained, yet we are constantly bombarded with dumb, sanitized denialism like Hillary's second sentence above. Instead of treating us like adults, we're infantilized. And to what end? Muslims are peaceful and tolerant, we're instructed, and they have nothing whatsoever to do with terrorism. This last bit is insultingly preposterous. Some Muslims have quite a lot to do with terrorism, actually. Like the ones who were led by their hardcore theology to kill 3,000 people on 9/11. Or blow up trains in Spain. Or target London's public transit system with bombs. Or slaughter students at a Kenyan university. Or Devastate a nightclub in Indonesia. Or shoot up a shopping mall in Nairobi. Or lay siege to a hotel in Mumbai. Or terrorize Nigerian schoolgirls. Or, you know, take hostages in Mali. I could go on for some time. But those aren't real Muslims, our Thought Leaders inform us. Islamists loudly beg to differ -- and wouldn't they know a lot more about their motives and religious teachings than Western purveyors of bumper sticker feel-goodery? Try this: Ask someone who's convinced jihadists shouldn't be considered Muslims whether or not Osama bin Laden's corpse should have been discarded with no regard for Islamic traditions. Or whether the terrorists at Gitmo should be deprived of prayer mats, or Halal meals, or Korans. Maybe some enterprising reporter will ask Hillary these questions someday. In any case, the "nothing to do with terrorism" line is plainly nonsense. The more difficult part is the "peaceful and tolerant" phrase. It's absolutely true that a huge preponderance of Muslims worldwide abhor and reject religious violence. But as I explored in a piece after the Charlie Hebdomassacre, there is a worrisomely sizable strain of abject illiberalism that runs through mainstream Islam. Data from Pew, a respected global pollster, gathered two years ago:
More
If she believes that, she should send Chelsie to visit the ISIS camp and talk with them. Maybe they could talk about briefcase clocks.
ReplyDeleteIf she believes that than she must also believe that her husband did not have sex with Monica Lewinski.
ReplyDeleteremember, she has brain damage.
ReplyDeleteAnd there will be FOOLS who will still vote for this lying murderer say and do ANYTHING to get elected.
ReplyDeleteHillary, it's obvious that your head injury and your take on the world have become closely intertwined.
ReplyDeleteI know she will say whatever she needs to so she receives votes. But isn't Islam the same religion that oppresses women? You know, like more oppressive than any other religion towards women? This is the same candidate that stands on her high horse for women's rights, right? How can that even be possible?
ReplyDeleteShe needs to be drug tested.
ReplyDeleteand she also said "I did not have sexual relations with that woman"!
ReplyDelete3:13, that is what I would like know. Why would anyone believe anything that comes from her. 4:31 that was her husband. mp
ReplyDeleteWould ANYONE in this country vote for a fool like Hillary?
ReplyDeleteBrain damage from 1960's with drugs along mental break down and that woman can not run for office due to power hungary with control freak mixed in it.
ReplyDelete