Popular Posts

Saturday, August 22, 2015

The Test For Justice – Indict Hillary

Hillary every bit a Saul Alinsky authoritarian radical as the rest of the crew

Once upon a time a unique Republic was a country where the rule of law maintained at least the appearance of constitutional government. The role of the US Attorney General was based upon enforcing accountability for government officials who broke statues. America like all other countries always had their share of crooks and thieves in public office. In spite of this, reasonably clear standards for prosecution were honored and appropriate indictments would follow. Politicizing the Department of Justice was not the measure of filing criminal charges.

Today, any thinking and informed person will conclude that justice is seldom achieved when the AG operates as a political tool for the government protection racket. When the Clinton machine is shielded from the punitive punishment that destroys ordinary officials, it should not astonish that an independent prosecutor or inspector general would be stonewalled in the finest tradition of the crooked political class.

Written six months ago, the Radical Reactionary essay, Hillary Express Hits a Wall deals with political reasons why Hillary Clinton is unqualified to be President. With the revelations of the knowingly mishandling and conscious circumvention of government communication on an unsecure server, the conditions are ripe to hold Clinton accountable for her misdeeds.

Will political pressure build to force a Watergate style investigation or will the cover-up culture keep defending their symbolic champion for totalitarian collectivism?

More

5 comments:

  1. Twon't happen,and even if it does the only purpose will be to pacify the masses.The problem there is that the masses don't rule and haven't for many years,so the result will be a slap on the wrist.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Watergate style investigations are reserved for Republicans, never happen to a Democrat.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Bill was a lot more honest than she; but, it doesn't discount that both at the end of the day are chuckleheads.

    ReplyDelete
  4. The role of the US Attorney General was based upon enforcing accountability for government officials who broke statues.
    There must have been a bunch of angry art critics in power back then...

    ReplyDelete
  5. Only cops get indicted.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.