A series of events that has been described as a “troubling turn” has been found to have taken place at the U.S. Supreme Court regarding the justices’ looming decision on marriage – whether they will affirm the millennia old standard of one man and one woman or whether they will create a right to homosexual “marriage.”
The report is from the law firm of William J. Olson, P.C., the workplace of Olson, who served in several positions for the Reagan administration, and Herb Titus, a longtime constitutional law professor.
The organization has issued a series of reports on the issue of marriage, under funding from the United States Justice Foundation.
The circumstances concern efforts to have Ruth Ginsburg and Elena Kagan recused from the marriage case because they both have taken public advocacy positions for same-sex “marriage” by performing those ceremonies even while the case was pending before the justices.
More
If they had recused themselves - the majority opinion would be different.
ReplyDeleteSo much for the integrity of the highest court in the land!
Should all of the Catholic justices recused themselves too?
ReplyDeleteHow about the Hobby Lobby case, should all of the Christian justices recused themselves?
ReplyDeleteHobby lobby is about making someone do something they don't want to. Same with the bakery BS. You mean the fags don't have bakeries or hobby shops?? REALLY. Let's destroy someone's life because I'm gay and they won't bake me a cake.
ReplyDeleteIts here on all fronts!!!
ReplyDeleteThe evil rainbow is here as predicted: A must read to be informed about the cult of evil among us...
Constance Cumbey
As an active Michigan lawyer,in Macomb, Oakland and Wayne counties of Michigan, USA ..the author of the first major critical book about the New Age Movement, THE HIDDEN DANGERS OF THE RAINBOW: The New Age Movement and our Coming Age of Barbarism (1983); A PLANNED DECEPTION: The Staging of a New Age Messiah (1986). Currently, completing books about Javier Solana, the Barcelona Process, Israel and the European Union.
ReplyDelete2:06 and 2:09 completely miss the point. Go back and read more carefully about why, ethically, and in accordance with both precedent and law, they should have recused themselves.
But the rules are for the peasants.
4:15 and 4:27 The discussion here is about judges recusing themselves on a case.
ReplyDeleteYou should do the same libitard.
DeleteIf you read the recommended literature you would see the connection to the justice system Idealogies, but it's okay, head back in sand and think it's all OK.
ReplyDelete