Justice Alito: Why Not Let 4 Lawyers Marry One Another?
In the oral arguments presented yesterday in the Supreme Court on the question of whether the U.S. Constitution guarantees two people of the same sex the right to marry one another, Justice Samuel Alito asked whether—if two of the same sex have a right to marry—why not four people of opposite sexes.
“Would there be any ground for denying them a license?” Alito asked.
“Let's say they're all consenting adults, highly educated. They're all lawyers,” he said.
Alito posed the question to Mary L. Bonauto, a lawyer who was presenting the court with arguments on behalf of clients seeking to establish a right to same-sex marriage.
Bonauto expressed the view that states cannot prohibit two people of the same-sex from marrying but can prohibit four people of different sexes from marrying.
.8% of our population is for practicing gay marriage/ partnerships. My dog is my same sex, and is i5 years old. I need to marry him soon so I can take out a life insurance policy on him!
Why not let someone marry a tree?
ReplyDeleteThese pervert gays are attacking marriage.
In less than 20 years their will be a marriage between a human and an animal.
ReplyDeletewhy not let them marry a horse and receive health insurance for both of them.
ReplyDeleteThese Mexican judges need a lesson.
ReplyDeletemarry my dogs leg.
ReplyDeleteHaggis.
Hey if i would be allowed to take out life insurance on my pet dog pony wife? I'm in
ReplyDeleteTHIS is testing waters for when Muslim men want to have 10 wife's legally next thing it will be OK to marry a 9 y/o ?
ReplyDelete.8% of our population is for practicing gay marriage/ partnerships. My dog is my same sex, and is i5 years old. I need to marry him soon so I can take out a life insurance policy on him!
ReplyDeleteHurry up and pass this bullcr@p!
6;13 Obama is proof of it !
ReplyDeleteHow does a buffoon like that get on the highest court?
ReplyDelete