Popular Posts

Tuesday, December 16, 2014

H.R.5344 - Responsible Body Armor Possession Act

Text: H.R.5344 — 113th Congress (2013-2014)All Bill Information (Except Text)

There is one version of the bill.

Bill text available as:
TXT
PDF
HTML/XML
Shown Here:
Introduced in House (07/31/2014)

Formatting necessary for an accurate reading of this legislative text may be shown by tags (e.g., <DELETED> or <BOLD>) or may be missing from this TXT display. For complete and accurate display of this text, see the PDF or HTML/XML. [Congressional Bills 113th Congress] [From the U.S. Government Printing Office] [H.R. 5344 Introduced in House (IH)] 113th CONGRESS 2d Session H. R. 5344 To prohibit the purchase, ownership, or possession of enhanced body armor by civilians, with exceptions. _______________________________________________________________________ IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES July 31, 2014 Mr. Honda (for himself, Ms. Kelly of Illinois, Mr. Hastings of Florida, and Mr. Pascrell) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary _______________________________________________________________________ A BILL To prohibit the purchase, ownership, or possession of enhanced body armor by civilians, with exceptions. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the ``Responsible Body Armor Possession Act''. SEC. 2. BAN ON PURCHASE, OWNERSHIP, OR POSSESSION OF ENHANCED BODY ARMOR BY CIVILIANS; EXCEPTIONS. (a) In General.--Chapter 44 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following: ``Sec. 932. Ban on purchase, ownership, or possession of enhanced body armor by civilians ``(a) Except as provided in subsection (b), it shall be unlawful for a person to purchase, own, or possess enhanced body armor. ``(b) Subsection (a) shall not apply to-- ``(1) a purchase, ownership, or possession by or under the authority of-- ``(A) the United States or any department or agency of the United States; or ``(B) a State, or a department, agency, or political subdivision of a State; or ``(2) enhanced body armor that was lawfully possessed by any person at any time before the date this section takes effect.''. (b) Enhanced Body Armor Defined.--Section 921(a) of such title is amended by adding at the end the following: ``(36) The term `enhanced body armor' means body armor, including a helmet or shield, the ballistic resistance of which meets or exceeds the ballistic performance of Type III armor, determined using National Institute of Justice Standard-0101.06.''. (c) Penalties.--Section 924(a) of such title is amended by adding at the end the following: ``(8) Whoever knowingly violates section 932 shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 10 years, or both.''.


7 comments:

  1. So we now have politicans who want to make sure we have no other means of protection after they have taken away our guns?

    ReplyDelete
  2. They just want to make sure that when they start using all those hundreds of millions of rounds of ammo they've purchased on the local civilians, "we, the people", will be as defenseless as they are trying their best to make us...
    These are your "representatives" and I ask 2 questions....
    1) who are they representing? and
    2) is this all they have to do???
    Keep cheering.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Why are they doing these things. "We the people", will eventually start a revolution, thus turning our once wonderful nation into more of a war zone that it is now.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Good thing there is no registration when you purchase it, and they should be grandfathered in.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Get it while you can. Preferably, with cash.

    ReplyDelete
  6. 9:56 AM

    welcome back

    ReplyDelete
  7. AND they are pushing for martial law in Chicago now.

    I wonder if each city will have their own 'killing fields'.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.