Why is it effectively impossible to contest a traffic ticket without a lawyer?
Emphasis on effectively.
Yes, it’s possible to learn the legalisms and procedures; the dance steps that are required in order to perform before a judge. But – like trying to learn how to tango – it is a dance few non-lawyers ever master. Which is, I think, precisely the point.
The legal profession is a kind of high-brow cartel that – like any other cartel – manufactures work for itself. Work that is not actually needed but merely required. Like tax preparation assistance, for example. No one genuinely needs this “service” – taxes being illegitimate takings-by-force of other people’s money. But most of us have no choice but to hire (and pay) a tax preparer, else we’re forced to pay even more in taxes.
So it is also with lawyers.
Especially traffic lawyers.
Why, pray, should anyone charged with “speeding” require the “services” of a lawyer to present the relevant facts to a judge? It is not – as they say – rocket science. The cop – acting in his absurd capacity as the aggrieved party – presents his evidence that you were “speeding:”
More
Country in run by lawyers and they keep themeslves employed
ReplyDeleteAlso, to feed this complex machine it eats money so they all lie to take your money and feed them all.
ReplyDeleteThis fact is why lawyers and cops are thought of as scum in today's world.
Yeah citizens in traffic court lie more than they tell the truth. Its sad how there is no personal responsibility or ethics in this country.
ReplyDelete