From 19th century efforts in which Democrats strained to keep slaves and former slaves from owning guns to 20th century plans to ban a politically defined category of guns—"assault weapons"—to 21st century efforts to dissuade women from gun ownership, Democrats have certainly proven they are the party of gun control.
In years gone by, Democrats have been successful at using distraction to keep Americans from ascertaining the party's real goals. They have criticized the Republicans for being the party of the rich, the party of big oil, the party of corporate America, the party waging war on women, and the list goes on. And through this approach, Democrats have been able to divide America—setting one citizen against another—then step in with government-funded compassion to make everything better.
But following the heinous attack on Sandy Hook Elementary, emboldened Democrats began to describe their gun control plans openly. Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) pushed an "assault weapons" ban that would have banned over 150 different firearms, and she and other Democrats also supported a ban on "high capacity" ammunition magazines. Senator Joe Manchin (D-WV) pushed gun control in the wake of Sandy Hook, too. Yet, unlike the other Democrats, Manchin actually admitted his gun control package would not have stopped the Sandy Hook shooting, but he pushed it nonetheless.
More
"dissuade women from gun ownership"....hate to tell you Dems & Libs, it didn't work with THIS woman!.. I have 7, thank you, including my beloved AR-15.
ReplyDeleteThe Democrats are describing themselves when they say "criticized the Republicans for being the party of the rich, the party of big oil, the party of corporate America, the party waging war on women, and the list goes on." I have seen plenty of Republicans and a lot of them are first of all rich because they worked hard through there life to earn it and not wait for hand outs; and Waging war on women, how often do you see a Republican politician on the news for adultery or affairs.
ReplyDelete