Popular Posts

Saturday, October 25, 2014

Man says it’s discrimination that people won’t hire him because he’s covered with tattoos

9 comments:

  1. No, it's not called "discrimination", it's called "Idiocy on your part"

    As an employer, I hire people who can represent my company and its agenda, not you and your agenda.

    I have rights, too.

    Suck it up, Big Boy, or pay to erase.

    ReplyDelete
  2. As an employer, I own that choice. You are asking to represent me and my company. So, I am the judge.

    ReplyDelete
  3. yea those neck tats can be a problem

    ReplyDelete
  4. that's not true. They won't hire him because he is a homo

    ReplyDelete
  5. More than likely he can't get hired because he hasn't any use able skill.

    ReplyDelete
  6. From San Francisco....he doesn't have enough of a brain to hire...it's all been liberal-ized!

    ReplyDelete
  7. no tats employed at my company.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Anonymous said...
    No, it's not called "discrimination", it's called "Idiocy on your part"

    As an employer, I hire people who can represent my company and its agenda, not you and your agenda.

    I have rights, too.

    Suck it up, Big Boy, or pay to erase.


    October 25, 2014 at 8:00 PM

    You said it best!

    ReplyDelete
  9. ...Went to a wedding a few weeks ago... The bride had to use 'cover-up makeup' on her back and arms to hide the tats.
    The business of the future? Tattoo removal. Trust me on that one.
    That sexy little eagle tattoo on your boob today will become a vulture when you turn 40.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.