DelMarVa's Premier Source for News, Opinion, Analysis, and Human Interest Contact Publisher Joe Albero at alberobutzo@wmconnect.com or 410-430-5349
DelMarVa's Premier Source for News, Opinion, Analysis, and Human Interest Contact Publisher Joe Albero at alberobutzo@wmconnect.com or 410-430-5349
Truly should be the other way around...and in some cases birth control should be required!
ReplyDeleteSo sick of this BS. Hobby Lobby covers 16 out of 20 different kinds of birth control for women. Plus they pay full time emplouees $14.00 an hour and part-time workers $9.00 an hour. So stop trashing them on their religious convictions to not cover birth control that causes abortions.
ReplyDeleteAnonymous 2:16
ReplyDeleteAll their items are from China. Their religious beliefs disappear when it tips turning them a large profit! It's hypocritical, and pad the supreme cout ruling as opens a dangerous door for what may be considered " religious beliefs"
Jehovah Witness do not believe in blood transfusions to save lives. Does this mean you will be denied if your employer does not believe in this?
Viagra should NOT be covered, period. It's truly a recreational drug 100%.
ReplyDelete2:49
ReplyDeleteRight out of the libtard dumbocrat talking points.
Hobby Lobby also doesn't buy your meals. Does that mean you starve to death?
Neither one should be "covered". Health insurance is not a right it is only a way for the government to control and destroy us. The very question is just wrong. No one in this country has ever been denied health care
ReplyDeletePicture perpetuates a false concept; those pills are regular birth control pills, not pregnancy terminating pills. They are the ones a responsible person would take. And they are so expensive that a month's supply costs almost as much as one Viagra.
ReplyDeleteNONE of this should be covered. period!!!
ReplyDeleteViagra should NOT be covered, period. It's truly a recreational drug 100%.
ReplyDeleteJuly 4, 2014 at 2:59 PM
ur full of crap.
Those birth control pills are covered! The only prescriptions not covered are the one's that terminate pregnancy after fertilization.
ReplyDeleteFinally some sense on this site!!
ReplyDeleteAnonymous Anonymous said...
ReplyDeleteFinally some sense on this site!!
July 4, 2014 at 5:22 PM
Do you contribute any?
Look at who placed the ad: Pro-choice NARAL. The exact opposite is actually true
ReplyDeleteCraig Theobald
Ironshire
More LIES from Democrats.
ReplyDeleteActually they are both covered and neither should be.
"... No one in this country has ever been denied health care."
ReplyDeleteNot quite true. Just ask veterans what kind of care they get from the VA.
Almost all of Maryland's 8000 sex offenders get Viagra paid for by the taxpayers! Stupid, and then they go out looking for a child to have sex with!
ReplyDeleteWhy should I have to pay for a fishing license? That's fun too.
ReplyDelete2:16 I'd like to point out, that while their religious convictions keep them from supporting those 4/20 contraceptive devices... they invest (401k) in the same companies that make said devices. Good stuff.
ReplyDelete7:49, finally, someone to expose the hypocrisy.
ReplyDelete
ReplyDeleteAgree; misleading 'ad'.
I'm a male; don't see any reason for Viagra or its clones to be covered by mandate under any plan.
In like fashion abortion causing drugs like those under focus should not be covered either.
If you wish to use them, reach into your pocket and buy them; both are easily available.
Coverage of 'regular' birth control pills really belongs with the above discussion....but....employers and insurance companies regard the expense as way, way cheaper than cost of a pregnancy, and thus are pretty comfortable in covering them.