Popular Posts

▼

Wednesday, July 30, 2014

How Ryan T. Anderson Responded to a Gay Man Who Wants to Redefine Marriage

MORE
at

8 comments:

  1. AnonymousJuly 30, 2014 at 3:52 PM

    That Ferry was so light in his loafers that I thought he was going to fly away.

    The speaker spoke so eloquently and walked all over that Homo. The Homo couldn't respond quick enough so he went and sat down.

    Kinda reminded me of Jim Ireton getting ready to have a hissy fit.

    ReplyDelete
  2. AnonymousJuly 30, 2014 at 4:07 PM

    Great response!

    The liberals want to change what has been an accepted tradition to suit their personal requirements.

    I don't think they should be barred from the benefits of the tradition...if they want benefits from a 'new' tradition - that's OK too...don't call it marriage!

    Call it "partnering" and let it go for throuples, quads, animals, and etc...it's all in the same 'non-traditional' category.

    ReplyDelete
  3. AnonymousJuly 30, 2014 at 4:45 PM

    To late for a compromise now. The same people protesting gay marriage were firmly again civil unions until they saw they were losing.

    ReplyDelete
  4. AnonymousJuly 30, 2014 at 6:13 PM

    Every time I hear some of this crap I think of Ireton for some reason , maybe I'm sick , but you guys got a real winner for a mayor.

    ReplyDelete
  5. AnonymousJuly 30, 2014 at 6:26 PM

    Civil unions was never barred it was Gays that scrapped it proving it's not about equality.

    ReplyDelete
  6. AnonymousJuly 31, 2014 at 5:10 AM

    Bet O'Gay O'Malley is upset on this one....

    ReplyDelete
  7. AnonymousJuly 31, 2014 at 11:07 AM

    Good for Anderson! He gave a great answer.

    ReplyDelete
  8. AnonymousJuly 31, 2014 at 11:11 AM

    Why does that pansyfied speaker remind me of Jim Ireton?

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.