Popular Posts

Sunday, March 23, 2014

WCSO DUI Enforcement

Narrative: On 15 March 2014 beginning at 10 PM and lasting into the early overnight hours, the Wicomico County Sheriff’s Office coordinated at Sobriety Checkpoint and DUI Enforcement Initiative. The WCSO was joined by troopers from the Maryland State Police Salisbury barrack and officers from the Salisbury and Fruitland Police Departments and the Maryland Natural Resources Police. Also we were honored to have a representative from Mothers Against Drunk Driving present during the checkpoint phase of the operation.

Arrested for Driving Under the Influence during this initiative:

Antonio Sebastian Chaney Jr., 25, Salisbury, MD

Taylor Avery Ahmay, 22, Salisbury, MD

Randy Richard Perdue, 43, Millsboro, DE

Matthew Thomas Hearne, 26, Parsonsburg, MD

Michelle Maureen Bomyea, 26, Salisbury, MD

Darin M. Kovach, 23, Salisbury, MD

Arrested for Possession of CDS during this initiative:

Female Juvenile, 16, Fruitland, MD

Female Juvenile, 17, Salisbury, MD

Male Juvenile, 17, Salisbury, MD

Kisnell NMN Pierre, 18, Salisbury, MD

Additional Arrests:

Mervin Burdette Henry, 25, Hurlock, MD – Arrested on a Circuit Court Bench Warrant issued following a violation of probation in a CDS Possession case.

Dennis Ryan Messick, 27, Hebron – Arrested after he interfered with the arrest of Michelle Bomyea above and assaulted the arresting trooper.

19 comments:

  1. Better Stay at Wal-Mart YO...you will never get a good job nowMarch 16, 2014 at 4:22 PM

    AHHH, it is so good to see so May Salisbury University Grad Students getting a Certificate of Appreciation for STUPID BEHAVIOR...

    ReplyDelete
  2. The Messick arrest is a false charge.
    The "trooper" (mercenary) was abusing this girl to the point of physical harm and Messick interceded in the assault to defend her from the bodily harm the jackboot was inflicting, all because of part of a joint in the ashtray.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Looks like the juvies need to learn to say no you can't search my car!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Where was the checkpoint?

    ReplyDelete
  5. How can they arrest anyone for something other than dui? The check point is to look for drunks . Not drunk then no reason to run an i.d. these check points even for dui is illegal. It needs to stop.

    ReplyDelete
  6. 6 drunks picked up and how many man hours were wasted from how many different departments? How many ordinary citizens were stopped and harassed by the revenuers? Yup those kids postig videos waving automatic weapons have all been rounded up, the gangs have all been run out of town. good use of resources!
    go git em barney!

    ReplyDelete
  7. Anonymous said...
    How can they arrest anyone for something other than dui? The check point is to look for drunks . Not drunk then no reason to run an i.d. these check points even for dui is illegal. It needs to stop.

    March 16, 2014 at 5:16 PM

    Where did you pass the Bar exam?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Dont need to pass the bar. I graduated high school.

      Cops have no right to randomly run identifications. There has to be probable cause of a sort to even engage a perp. The same as a cop cant just go around running license plates without a cause. And the same goes for ids.iillegal searches that luck out to actually finds something. Its criminoligy 101 idiot.
      Its about time we stand against this tyrany of the government. They said drinking and driving is bad....and it is.but the sheeple blindly fell into big bros propraganda and forgot about their rights all pissed off because people were dying. Mean while our rights are slowly stripped away in the name of good. After years of this happening we have few rights left to lose.

      Delete
  8. 6:31 actually how many lives were saved and just the information being made public may actually keep someone from driving drunk. But then again you've probably guility of drinking and driving and would love to see a blind eye view on checkpoints.keep up the good job guy's.

    ReplyDelete
  9. How many lives would be saved by arresting the smack and crack dealers? Since it is ok to stop and interrogate anyone driving down the road at a certain time it should then be ok to just go house to house looking for criminal activity…no?

    ReplyDelete
  10. Drinking and driving is just like anything else; it's PRACTICE, PRACTICE, PRACTICE!

    LOL!

    ReplyDelete
  11. But 9:38 sure is going to need a lawyer and I bet sooner than later.

    ReplyDelete
  12. 8:43 better they just sit around doing nothing? Would this please you or just give you something else to complain about?

    ReplyDelete
  13. wow 9:38 you clearly don't know what you are talking about. Perfectly legal for police to run any tag without reason and talk to any person without cause.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Try reading it again. He said its not legal yet they continue to do so becuase people have no sense of their rights.

      Delete
  14. 8:05 wow, you're a victim.
    You have been victimized by the propaganda that tries to justify this
    uncontitutional behavior based on supposition and the "maybe/might happen, could happen, probably will happen, but were really not sure it will happen, but just to be sure" crowds we will preemptively trample everyone's rights to stop a "potential" accident from happening logic.
    This is kind of like a scenario where someone stole 5 dollars in Mrs. Jones second grade classroom, so we the administration are going to search the entire 800 member student body!

    Enough already with the unconstitutional preemptive law enforcement!! Statistics prove it does not reduce the crime it targets.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Broke the law, knowingly riding around with a joint in the ashtray...not a real smart move...pay the fine and do the time!!! Next time stay home!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  16. 9:16 I commend you !!! for being a complete idiot. With your way of thinking all crimes would go unsolved-unpunished. I am guessing you got bullied alot in school. Weaklings like yourself are the reason the country is in trouble. With your logic the criminals would just prey on people like you. You just dont get it the only thing between you and thugs is the cops.

    ReplyDelete
  17. I demand that you print the parent's name that is responsible for their child until they are of age-18. The parent cannot hide from their duty to supervise their children. If they can't trust them out of the house, then keep them home. Very simple. I am tired of seeing male 16 or female 17. Get some gumption and do your duty. The public deserves to know who these slack-off parents are.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.