This says it all about, ABC, NBC, CBS, MSNBC, CNN!
Recognize this guy? Even Fox News doesn't use this photo
Do you know who this is?
It is Little Trayvon Martin...! At 17 yrs of age.
For those of us who thought we were well informed and weren't.....quite the realty check.
That old adage applies here: "there are two sides to every story."
We don't always get the truth from the media.
One of my favorite rants - the liberal controlled media, television news, newspapers, magazines, radio; all continue to show 12 year old Trayvon; NOT 17 year old Trayvon.
In reality "little Trayvon" at the time of his death stood almost 6'2" tall and weighed 175 muscular pounds. He had numerous run-ins with authorities (both at school and local police), had been stopped and almost arrested two days before his death for smacking a bus driver in the face, because the driver refused to let him ride for free.
He was released because the driver was told not to press charges by the bus company and to continue on his route.
When "little Trayvon" was suspended at school it was not only because he tried to bring a little marijuana in with him, he was in possession of wedding rings and other jewelry, watches, etc. that he said he "found" along with a large screwdriver while on the way to school that day. The jewelry was turned over to the Police by the school.
I am not trying to say this was a good shooting.
I am not trying to say this kid deserved to die.
I am saying the media in the USA is controlled by liberals who twist and distort what you see and hear in order for you to see things their way.
Not a single paper has printed RECENT photos of this kid, because it would not keep your interest in this case.
Not a single paper will admit that this kid was a marijuana dealer.
His friends on Facebook all say he had the "best plants". Not a single paper will show you any of his recent photos where he shows off a mouthful of gold teeth and all of his tattoos. Not a single newspaper will tell the news like it really is ...and NOT how they want you to think it is... President Obama looked at the FIVE year old photo the media chose to show the Nation and said, "If I had a son...he would look like Trayvon.." So from that comment should I assume you did
not bother to look for the facts in this shooting..
or should I assume you want a son who is a 17 year old drug dealing, gold teethed, tattooed thug whose name on one of his facebook profiles was "Wild Nigga" who 'finds" jewelry and burglary tools on the way to school? A fair and impartial news media in the USA ? One that does not follow the preconceived liberal agenda? One that is NOT looking to further divide this already fractured Nation?I didn't compose this. I'm only passing it on.Never trust the news media for WHOLE TRUTH and NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH.
Trayvon at 12 yrs of age.. how he was shown to us!
| 
The liberal media is constantly trying to stir up racial strife.
ReplyDeletePictures?
ReplyDeleteThose of us that choose to be informed of the truth seek it out and do not believe democrat propaganda, nor do we believe in abusing powers of the state and press to harass, intimidate and impune those with different ideology.
Travon was a thug and thought of himself and even named himself appropriately. It ios doubtful had he lived he ever would have contributed to society in a positive and meaningful way.
If I were his parents I would be devastated as well, not by the loss but by contributing to his delinquency and thereby being responsible for it.
Sometimes there is three or four sides to a story this is why there is a court of law.
ReplyDeleteThe hell with "PC"....Let's all admit what's going to happen: The verdict will be handed-down in the middle of a hot summer in America. If he is NOT guilty, there will be two days of rioting and looting. If he is found GUILTY, there will be two days of rioting and looting.
ReplyDeleteThis trial shows why this country is in shambles.
And while I'm here: I am TOTALLY offended by the word "Cracker". It is demeaning, it is racist. It is highly offensive to me. From now on I am asking all the news services to refer to that word as "the C-word". If it is mentioned during the trial, I want it 'bleeped-out". If not, I will sue.
I also want to know the names of any famous Black people that have ever used the word "cracker" in their lifetime. They should be punished and banned from any possibility of ever working in their trade for the rest of their lives. Just like Paula.
Got it?
9:27: Do NOT ever think that his parents are "devastated". They have made close to a million dollars already on this tragedy, and stand to make millions more. Devastated? I don't think so .
ReplyDeleteAs the Prosecutor asked, "Is this something that is in your culture...?".
Yes, it is.
I agree 11:21. I was highly offended by the "cracker" comment especially coming from that "diamond" in the rough. I also agree about Paula. I don't know much about Paula Deen. I don't follow cooking shows.
ReplyDeleteI do think that is BS that she loses her job and all her sponsors because she admits to using the "N" word to describe a person who attacked/robbed her many years ago.
I would really believe that black people have a problem with the "N" word if they didn't use it every other word. Listen to their music. Listen to their how they speak. And then, even if I did perceive that they didn't like the word, why should I not use it. Do they ever sensor themselves in how they talk about us. H*ll NO!
They get to say whatever they want about us, hence the crazy cracker remark. They get to treat us basically any way they want, hence the black mob violence that we never hear about that happens every day. I for one am just about fed up with the PC BS that white people have to subject themselves to and the double standard that means no one else has to even pretend to like us.
Yesterday attorney representing Martin's family issued a statement. It said Martin's parents were prepared for any verdict. They see which way the trial's going.
ReplyDeleteThe trial is not going to well for the State. They are being blindsided by some of their own witnesses who it seems are recollecting new things left and right. Prosecutors are getting flustered and are breaking rules of trial strategy such as asking a witness a question they don't already know the answer to. This happened yesterday (jury was out of the room.)
ReplyDeleteOf course the real Trayvon was not as the MSM has depicted him to be. Proof is his friend who spent the last 2 days testifying. She was sarcastic, confrontational and had an all around bad attitude. If Trayvon were the altar boy we are supposed to believe he was than that girl would not be a close friend of his.
ReplyDeleteIf not for Zimmerman's liberty being at stake, the spin the MSM and others are putting on this and the chatter of the "low information" crowd who are falling for it, would be amusing.
A lot of people get their info from Nancy Grace and think and believe everything she said is gospel. What they either don't know or ignore is that is that she is former disgraced prosecutor who due to her difficulty with telling the truth was sanctioned in her short career many more times than most prosecutors in a whole career. Guilty verdicts even overturned due to her lying.
ReplyDeleteThe only reason she even has a job is because obviously HLN wanted someone to promote their agenda and found the perfect person in her because she's a pathological liar and will say anything that will benefit her.
hahaha, fools, every one of you. The law in this case is clear. Zimmerman stalked and killed an unarmed teen. Guilty as chrged.
ReplyDeleteGeorge Zimmerman is not judge & jury in the life of Trayvon. He killed a young man and this requires that he go through the process of a trial for such a crime. This is a crime being prosecuted. George is no hero, quite the opposite.
ReplyDeleteWhat law is that 8:59? I'll wait patiently for an answer though I'm sure it's not coming.
ReplyDeleteTo 8:59. Not Guilty. Travon Martin attacked Zimmerman.
ReplyDeleteYeah we know Z. killed M. That's not the issue. The issue is was it justified. The only question the jury will need to ask themselves is how long should a person allow themselves to get beaten up before they fight back-unless they think Z's injuries weren't caused by M.
ReplyDeleteNothing else matters though it makes for a good story and may just play on the jurors emotions but as far as 'evidence' it's not.
-another "key" prosecution witness has just done major damage to the State's case and prosecutor is having a meltdown and accusing the witness-his own witness- of being a liar.
ReplyDeleteThe reason they had to use pictures of Martin from 5 years ago was because any current pictures of him are not flattering. They show his real imagine which is that of a statistic of juvenile delinquency well on his way to being nothing but a number within the prison system until this happened. Now he's a statistic of those who chose to live a high risk lifestyle.
ReplyDeleteThe fat girl lied about her age for a reason. She was having sex with Travon and he was a minor and she was not, ergo she is legally a child predator.
ReplyDeleteIf TM were so afraid as "Precious" claimed he would have dropped the call with her and called 911 instead of lurking in the shadows and jumping GZ when he got out of his vehicle to check the address when asked by the 911 operator for a location.
ReplyDeleteIn a jury trial, a directed verdict is an order from the presiding judge to the jury to return a particular verdict. Typically, the judge orders a directed verdict after finding that no reasonable jury could reach a decision to the contrary. After a directed verdict, there is no longer any need for the jury to decide the case.
ReplyDelete=======================================
This is what the TM judge should do.
A directed verdict of Not Guilty
"Anonymous said...
ReplyDeletehahaha, fools, every one of you. The law in this case is clear. Zimmerman stalked and killed an unarmed teen. Guilty as chrged.
June 28, 2013 at 8:59 AM"
Time to give this one up pal.....it's over...the putrid race baiters have lost...may they rot in hell.
Is the prosecutor calling witnesses for the state or is he calling Defense witnesses?--somewhat confused--- maybe its a new way of presenting your case lol
ReplyDeleteIf it don't fit YOU MUS AQUIT!
ReplyDeleteI've made the same point about the 12 year old, versus 17 year old photos numerous times. And they wonder why the mass media has such a bad reputation? This entire case has been a propaganda fest right from the start. If this was a case where a black man killed an unarmed white guy it would have barely made the "news". Just business as usual. But instead it's a liberal media circus. No surprise.
ReplyDeleteI'm not 100% convinced either way, whether or not the killing was legally justified, but I am 100% convinced the liberal media is shameless.
For sure a directed verdict of not guilty. It's over. The prosecution has done nothing except spoon feed the jury reasonable doubt after reasonable doubt after reasonable doubt.
ReplyDeleteIf I am carrying concealed, and am involved in a physical confrontation where a much younger, stronger person has me down and I am in immediate threat of losing consciousness, then, at that point, it's anybody's gun. Who owned it first is no longer in question. It's time to claim ownership and delete the threat of it becoming my attacker's gun.
ReplyDeleteZ, Not Guilty, self defense.
Quick question: Has it been addressed WHY he was in the gated community?
ReplyDelete2:41-His father's girlfriend lived there. At the time the father and girlfriend weren't home. Just TM and her 12 yr old son.
ReplyDelete