Popular Posts

Sunday, June 16, 2013

Receivership Allows City To Move Forward On First Blighted Property


1110 North Division Street

The property is owned by Donna Joseph. The home is vacant and in danger of falling into disrepair. On October 25, 2011, NSCC issued a notice to Ms. Joseph to repair broken windows. That order was not satisfied and a citation was ultimately issued. The citation was not paid and was forwarded to District Court for a hearing. After three (3) unsuccessful attempts at summons service, NSCC successfully submitted an affidavit of judgment to Judge Wade, which resulted in a guilty finding, with fines doubled in the amount of $200 plus court costs.

NSCC ultimately boarded up the broken windows to secure the structure. NSCC also has the following violations open on this structure: Condemnation order due to fire damage (citations issued for failing to make repairs from fire damage, currently attempting summons service); Failing to provide a vacant building registration (citations issued, holding for a court date); Failing to provide a rehab plan (citations issued, holding for a court date); Peeling paint (citations issued, holding for a court date); In addition, NSCC has had to hire third party contractors to cut the grass and remove rubbish since April 2011.

Currently, the amount owed to the City of Salisbury on this property is $9, 519.12. At last check the structure has not been sold at tax sale. Tom Stevenson, Director of Neighborhood Services and Code Compliance (NSCC) said, “Considering this is a new endeavor, the first few petitions will naturally be somewhat cumbersome.” Stevenson has decided that 1110 N. Division Street is best candidate to “test the waters.” Along with five remaining properties, NSCC will continue to vet additional properties from the original inventory for the program.

22 comments:

  1. GOOD now only 217 left, Then maybe people will take part in moving BACK to Salisbury.

    ReplyDelete
  2. maybe next they can get to the house down the street from this one with the floor to ceiling trash piled on the screened porch.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I always loved that home, and the awesome porch. too bad its on a corner in a not so nice neighborhood.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Pity it was a beautiful house in it's day.

    ReplyDelete
  5. This is what happens when greasy landlords take Section 8.............

    ReplyDelete
  6. Ok. I know Donna. She has cancer and lives in Florida a local company here is listed as her contact but BHZ has paper work screwed up. Nice first start. Send paperwork to wrong address and pick on a sick woman who owns several other houses that are in great shape!

    ReplyDelete
  7. 8:33 PM is exactly correct! Slumlords Suck!

    ReplyDelete
  8. That SAlisbury's MO been that way for years the real slumlord's keep making money

    ReplyDelete
  9. Doesn't look so bad. I was expecting them to go after something really blighting a neighborhood.

    Did this woman piss the mayor off some time?

    ReplyDelete
  10. If Miss Joseph is Florida fighting cancer and owns several other properties available for rent then the cat was let out of the bag on the first property. This grant funding is going to be used for the slumlords to spruce up their blighted rentals at the expense of the taxpayers. Did anyone really think the funding was to be used for low income home owners?

    ReplyDelete
  11. I agree with 7:34. This is just another scam used to pad the pockets of those who can afford to better their properties.
    Some of these blighted properties have been in the families for generations but have fallen into disrepair because the current owners couldn't afford upkeep, taxes, etc. The fund should be used to help them who may I add are mostly African Americans. Where's Shanie on this one? It's a crime the way these homeowners get passed over and screwed every time.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Shanie is for her people as long as it doesn't conflict with those that fill her feed trough.

    ReplyDelete
  13. The gov't is tryting to steal this poor woman's property.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Anonymous said...
    I agree with 7:34. This is just another scam used to pad the pockets of those who can afford to better their properties.
    Some of these blighted properties have been in the families for generations but have fallen into disrepair because the current owners couldn't afford upkeep, taxes, etc. The fund should be used to help them who may I add are mostly African Americans. Where's Shanie on this one? It's a crime the way these homeowners get passed over and screwed every time.

    June 13, 2013 at 8:05 AM

    I've got an idea you idiot. I am a home owner in the city working my but off to maintain my house and mortgage. Why not use some of that money to help some of us keep up our house. If she owns several other houses then maybe she should sell them or get out of the slum lord business.

    I also noticed how you dropped the race card in your comment.

    ReplyDelete
  15. why would anyone want to live in salisbury. college animals free out of their cages, double taxation. a circus for a city council. wasting 260,000 dollars on a skateboard park. been cheaper to dig the old one up. : )
    total idiots.
    the county is bad enough with it's fools on the council.. heaven forbid living in the city.

    ReplyDelete
  16. What are you talking about 12:12? You said exactly the same thing 8:05 said. Use the money to help people who really need the help upkeep their properties and not use it to help landlords or those who own multiple properties.

    You noticed the "race card" was dropped? It was just pointed out that many of these homes are owned by blacks (and they are from what I know and most are elderly.) That's not dropping the race card. It's just pointing out that Shanie isn't being a good representative to those she was elected to represent. She should (as the other reps in their own districts) be pushing for the money to be going to individuals and not landlords and/or people who own multiple homes.

    ReplyDelete
  17. 2:14 Trying to justify living in the stinking country where anyone can put anything next to your property. No thanks.

    ReplyDelete
  18. 3:32 Yeah, we're all better off having a corrupt pool of a$$holes determining what we can, and can't, do on our property.

    I'll take my country home, where I pay next to nothing in taxes and can do whatever I want, when I want.

    Good luck with your oppressive regime goals of 2013.

    ReplyDelete
  19. You know what would be a great idea is to post the city's slum lords names and their list of properties in the news and this blog once a month, so everyone would know who they are!!!!! Shame on them, they didn't get this way over nite, and tax payers aren't responsible for their health problems.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Somebody needs a time out.

    ReplyDelete
  21. I've got an idea you idiot. I am a home owner in the city working my but off to maintain my house and mortgage. Why not use some of that money to help some of us keep up our house. If she owns several other houses then maybe she should sell them or get out of the slum lord business.

    I also noticed how you dropped the race card in your comment.

    June 13, 2013 at 2:12 PM

    And you dropped the idiot card.

    ReplyDelete
  22. I'll take my country home, where I pay next to nothing in taxes and can do whatever I want, when I want.

    Good luck with your oppressive regime goals of 2013.

    June 13, 2013 at 5:22 PM

    Think so? You must have not done anything semi-major that you would need a permit, or you did it without getting a permit.

    One can't even have a bonfire for pleasure without it requiring a permit.

    If anyone can do anything to their property without worrying about their neighbors turning them in, go ahead. Getting the county involved is too big a hassle and much more expensive.

    And from what I have seen, they are not the brightest crayons in the box.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.