Police Dispatches
|
Old fees
|
Old Annual cost
|
New fees
|
New Annual cost
|
Annual
difference
|
% change
|
1
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
0%
|
2
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
0%
|
3
|
$50
|
$50
|
$246
|
$246
|
$196
|
392%
|
4
|
$100
|
$150
|
$246
|
$492
|
$342
|
228%
|
5
|
$150
|
$300
|
$246
|
$738
|
$438
|
146%
|
6
|
$200
|
$500
|
$246
|
$984
|
$484
|
97%
|
7
|
$250
|
$750
|
$246
|
$1,230
|
$480
|
64%
|
8
|
$300
|
$1,050
|
$246
|
$1,476
|
$426
|
41%
|
9
|
$400
|
$1,450
|
$246
|
$1,722
|
$272
|
19%
|
10
|
$500
|
$1,950
|
$246
|
$1,968
|
$18
|
1%
|
11
|
$600
|
$2,550
|
$246
|
$2,214
|
-$336
|
-13%
|
12
|
$700
|
$3,250
|
$246
|
$2,460
|
-$790
|
-24%
|
13
|
$800
|
$4,050
|
$246
|
$2,706
|
-$1,344
|
-33%
|
14
|
$1,000
|
$5,050
|
$246
|
$2,952
|
-$2,098
|
-42%
|
As shown above, the home or business that experiences a third false alarm sees a 392% increasein the fee/fine. Any location experiencing 3-10 false alarms will pay a higher fee than before. On the other end of the spectrum, those using/abusing the city's resources the most, with 14 false alarms, receive a 42% discount.
Giving frequent flyer discounts to those who have the most calls for service is totally contrary to the purpose of the fee/fine.
Despite all the talk about Salisbury being more "business friendly", this proposed increase will have an even more significant impact on businesses. There are more commercial than residential alarm customers within the city limits. Businesses also typically experience more false alarms than homes, due to many factors including: multiple users/employees, employee turnover, off hour deliveries, etc. Ironically, the large majority of the owners of the businesses impacted do not live in the city, and therefore have no vote.
In summation, the vast majority of those affected by a false alarm fee will pay more, significantly more. The very small number of people experiencing 11 or more false alarms in a year, are the only ones benefiting from a fee reduction, yet they are the ones putting the most strain on the city's limited resources.
Escalating fee/fine structures like the one Salisbury had in place prior to this change, are in use in almost all jurisdictions across the country, are proven to significantly reduce the number of false alarms, and have been successfully defended in many courts.
We urge you to contact all city representatives today to voice your opposition to the new "False Alarm Fee Schedule for Police Response": Mayor Jim Ireton: 410-548-3100, jireton@ci.salisbury.md.us
Council Vice President Debbie Campbell: 410-860-0893, debbiescampbell@comcast.net
Council President Terry Cohen: 410-845-0296, terryecohen@gmail.com
Councilwoman Laura Mitchell: 410-422-2694, Laura@lauramitchell.org
Councilwoman Shanie Shields: 443-523-0084, sshields820@aol.com
Councilman Tim Spies: 410-219-5209, tspies@cavtel.net Regards, Ron Boltz President & CEO Alarm Engineering |
|
|
Mayor McTAX .......Unreal.
ReplyDeleteThey will eventually try to institute a policy in which you have to pay for any response from Police.
ReplyDeleteIf they are called you will pay regardless of criminal activity or the lack thereof.
They may not respond if your previous payments are not received.
I got this same email from Alarm Engineering? Who sold them my email address?
ReplyDeleteFYI, Joe, the Chamber of Commerce is blaming the city council for this with absolutely no mention of Ireton having been the brains behind this and the Lockout Ordinance.
ReplyDeleteIf you think the Chamber is on your side, think again. Funny how they never blamed Tilghman or Ireton for anything, only the council.
Years ago, my employer asked if I wanted to represent the company to the Chamber. I said thanks, but no thanks because I knew way too many 2-faced people in it.
I've been telling you...they and just about every county, city, and state, have spent so much money that they can do NOTHING but raise taxes, fines, fees, levies, and surcharges, And they will continue to do it, right up to the point that "we, the people" take our country back, just like Jefferson said we SHOULD and WOULD. Of course, he was wearing his tin-foil hat, so I guess he didn't really know what he was saying. And PLEASE. PLEASE. Stop thinking YOUR guy will "change" things. Its way too late for any election to do that. Does the word "entrenched" mean anything to you?? How about "betrayal"? Constitution? Tree of Liberty?? ANYTHING?!?
ReplyDeleteThose words seem to mean nothing to most people today. They only seem to be concerned about smoking pot and their right to be gay. It's a very selfish agenda.
Delete