Over the last few years, we’ve noticed that nearly every victory the FBI celebrates against terrorism is actually about stopping its own terrorist plots that it feeds to hapless individuals, often nudging them and pushing them down the road to “become” terrorists, despite commonly displaying little to no aptitude for actual terrorism.
Add the NY Times to the newspapers who are beginning to question the FBI’s penchant for setting up its own plots for the sake of a high profile arrest of some clueless individuals.
The United States has been narrowly saved from lethal terrorist plots in recent years – or so it has seemed. A would-be suicide bomber was intercepted on his way to the Capitol; a scheme to bomb synagogues and shoot Stinger missiles at military aircraft was developed by men in Newburgh, N.Y.; and a fanciful idea to fly explosive-laden model planes into the Pentagon and the Capitol was hatched in Massachusetts.
But all these dramas were facilitated by the F.B.I., whose undercover agents and informers posed as terrorists offering a dummy missile, fake C-4 explosives, a disarmed suicide vest and rudimentary training. Suspects naïvely played their parts until they were arrested.
More
They have to keep us all scared of something so that they can have full control. It always makes you think about 9/11 and how the towers came down as if they were wired to be demolished.
ReplyDeleteNo comments?
ReplyDeleteWhat, no one else see's the irony and deceit of this Governments actions?
Truth is since 9/11 there have been no terrorist attacks unless the Government agent provocateurs instigate/orchestrate them for political gain.
This Regime has got to go.
Remember when Rudy Gulliani ran for his parties nomination?I don't care what he was asked,he could always get 9/11 in there somehow.If someone asked him about the abortion issue for instance,he would start his answer with "well on 9/11".My goodness;if thats all he had to offer I'm glad he's gone.I am convinced that he and others like him had no clue about the facts stated in this article.
ReplyDelete