Popular Posts

Tuesday, March 13, 2012

No Paul = No Vote In November

"I would also say of Ron Paul – he doesn't need to win. In his view he is winning already. This is an ideological point he is making. But here's why it's electorally significant – a lot of people, I mean 41 percent in Virginia, only two people on the ballot, still a lot of people voted for Ron Paul. A lot of those voters are portable. They're not Republican – they're not dedicated Republican voters." – Tucker Carlson, Editor, The Daily Caller

It is time for a groundswell of Ron Paul supporters to quietly, respectfully but firmly make their position clear to the mainstream media and the GOP establishment. Simply put, "No Paul on the ticket means no vote for the GOP in November."

The Ron Paul Campaign has the GOP establishment stuck between a rock and a hard place even though they have not won a single state in the primaries to date. Every Paul supporter knows the underhanded tactics used by the Republican leadership at the state and national level as well as the organized smear and news blackout campaign carried out by the mainstream media.

More

8 comments:

  1. and if they dont vote for gop, it just helps obama

    when will people learn

    ReplyDelete
  2. The nation wins in the long run 8:27. The fact that so many people take the position of "anyone but Obama" strengthens the positions of the political parties. They know they can continue carrying out media blackouts and manipulating the votes since people will cave in to the party first mentality. It's nonsense. The only way to adjust the attitudes of those with the "Party First" mentality is to punish the party. I am a registered republican. I dispise Obama. But political parties are equally to blame for the current condition of this nation. They have become the epitome of greed. And for this, we the people pay the price. Greedy political parties have effectively divided Americans as they serve special interests for individual member gain at the detriment of our founding underpinnings. Shame on us for letting this happen. I will be voting for Paul because a vote for Paul is a vote for the return of the constitution as the law of the land. If Paul doesn't win - and it's apparent he won't - I won't be voting to reward the manipulative efforts of the Republican party. If Obama wins, the Republican party has no one but itself to blame.

    ReplyDelete
  3. 9:52

    You know the devil you have in Obama. He has done more to take away our rights in three years than the other 43 presidents combined.

    Remember , that most establishment republicans didn't like Reagan and he went on to become the best President in our lifetime according to a recent poll. So yes, vote anybody but Obama.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Ron Paul is the only one who will never run again,and he knows it.Gingrich may or may not run again,and of the remaining 2,one may be our next president.After reading this article I realize how a candidate can be blackballed.The majority of those who read this blog appear to like Paul,as do I.I hate to say it,but his nomination appears impossible at this point.However,come election day,I'll pick the lesser of the evils and vote anyway.

    ReplyDelete
  5. What 9:52 said! I've had it. There are very few differences between the parties anymore. Big banks and big corporations are running the show.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I also agree with Anon 9:52. I've been saying it's all about greed for a long time.
    The Republican Party has figured out that they don't have a candidate to win.
    Now, they're shifting their focus on getting the majority in the House AND Senate to block Obama for the next 4 years. We have 4 more years of games folks.
    Then, in 2016, they're hoping they'll have a candidate worth electing, while at the same time, they realize that the Democrats don't have anybody to put up in 2016 so it'll be role reversal.
    It's ALL games and nothing more. In the meantime, those of us who work for a living and are not rich on stocks/bonds, bonuses and other means of becoming rich, suffer.
    It's all about the rich in this country. Trickle down doesn't work. It never has.

    ReplyDelete
  7. 9:52 I'm with you No Paul no vote

    ReplyDelete
  8. It doesn't matter if Paul is on ballot or not. He can't win. And if you don't vote, or even if you do vote, he can't win.

    Face it, the ONLY viable candidate is BARRACK OBAMA.

    You wanted to prove you were not racist when you voted him into office in 2008 and now you are stuck with him.

    I'm just wondering if he is going to buy a new prayer rug for the next 4 years or use the same one.

    They were going to paint the white house black, remember?

    They did succeed in painting the flag black though.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.