Popular Posts

▼

Monday, January 09, 2012

Today's Survey Question 1-9-12

Do you agree with a school's decision to reject a submitted yearbook photograph (posted here) because they found it too revealing?
at

20 comments:

  1. CathyJanuary 9, 2012 at 11:24 AM

    yes. when i graduated in 98, we could only use the formal headshots. i can't even believe her parents thought this was appropriate.

    ReplyDelete
  2. AnonymousJanuary 9, 2012 at 11:36 AM

    Yes. There have to be standards that students adhere to.

    ReplyDelete
  3. AnonymousJanuary 9, 2012 at 11:44 AM

    Yes, absoulutely. I totally agree with Cathy's posting above. I am just appalled. Kudos to the school.

    ReplyDelete
  4. AnonymousJanuary 9, 2012 at 11:45 AM

    The answer can be found in your question- posed... If the picture submitted was intended for a school yearbook, than yes, it's to revealing. However, if the picture was submitted for call girl services, phone sex services, or promotion for x rated video than I would say- you have a match! This is not a girl I hope my son brings home for family dinner when he is old enough to date. This is the picture of a girl he will meet in a bar at 1:am spend a few hazy hours with and throw her number out the window of his car on the drive home.

    ReplyDelete
  5. AnonymousJanuary 9, 2012 at 11:45 AM

    Yes, this photo is entirely too provocative for a high school year book.

    ReplyDelete
  6. AnonymousJanuary 9, 2012 at 12:08 PM

    Professional dye job, lack of wardrobe - must be a West Coast HS. Best beware of future HS trends - they always seem to start west and move eastward in 2-4 years!!

    Yes its over the top IF its a HS yearbook pic!! Not questioning, just saying!

    ReplyDelete
  7. AnonymousJanuary 9, 2012 at 12:11 PM

    If those clothing choices are banned from being worn at school then yes. Yet we still have people questioning why teachers are enticed and end up sleeping with students. If she was out in a bar or wherever, I would ask her out.

    The real problem here is her parents for allowing this type of outfit to be purchased and worn. This is appropriate bar/clubbing/hooker outfits for 20 something year olds.

    ReplyDelete
  8. AnonymousJanuary 9, 2012 at 12:11 PM

    no.

    ReplyDelete
  9. AnonymousJanuary 9, 2012 at 12:13 PM

    No, Just put photo like this in "Loosies" section of the year book, under most likely to suck-seed.

    ReplyDelete
  10. AnonymousJanuary 9, 2012 at 12:16 PM

    Oh for heaven's sake. What kind of parents does she have? It's not so much that most of her is unclothed, it's the provocative posture and the entire attitude presented. These are 17 & 18 year olds, not porn stars!

    ReplyDelete
  11. AnonymousJanuary 9, 2012 at 12:38 PM

    I thought that was the staircase at the Heifner mansion.

    ReplyDelete
  12. AnonymousJanuary 9, 2012 at 12:42 PM

    I thought this was the Pricipal of our PUBLIC SCHOOL SYSTEM!

    ReplyDelete
  13. AnonymousJanuary 9, 2012 at 1:01 PM

    yes

    ReplyDelete
  14. AnonymousJanuary 9, 2012 at 2:11 PM

    The photographer needs to get out of the senior business, and the parents need to take a parenting class.

    ReplyDelete
  15. AnonymousJanuary 9, 2012 at 2:40 PM

    Yes.

    ReplyDelete
  16. AnonymousJanuary 9, 2012 at 3:53 PM

    11:45AM...LOL...you hit the nail on the head!
    and yes, what a trampish photo

    ReplyDelete
  17. AnonymousJanuary 9, 2012 at 3:53 PM

    11:45AM...LOL...you hit the nail on the head!
    and yes, what a trampish photo

    ReplyDelete
  18. AnonymousJanuary 9, 2012 at 4:03 PM

    ha lol 12:13

    ReplyDelete
  19. AnonymousJanuary 9, 2012 at 5:22 PM

    No looks like rock & roll revival outfit. Nothing is revealed???

    ReplyDelete
  20. AnonymousJanuary 9, 2012 at 8:29 PM

    Absolutely yes!

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.