Charlie is a 42 year old man and the victim is a 14 year old girl. If you look on the Maryland judiciary website for Charlie slicer Poole you will find the charges that he is being charged with. He has confessed to the charges. I'm told by the mother of the victim, that she was told not to be sulfides if he gets convicted on statutory rape. Now how can sodomy of a fourteen year old girl be anything other than rape.
I'm afraid a deal or plea agreement is going to be made like has done before on the pedophiles. Charlie is someone I trusted, a friend I thought that my kids, especially my 10 year old daughter. I've found out recently my daughter was in his bed taking a nap with the door locked. I've contacted the officer in charge and the child advocate center with no answer.
I'm hearing around town that he is being treated to lunch by the officers for tips on minor drug activity. Why is this pedophile being treated like this. Why are my concerns with my Daughter going unanswered. Why would the states attorney even think about making a deal.
I want his name out there so if there are any more children that may have had contact with him can come forward too.
Publishers Notes: A preliminary hearing will be held on November 17th. If probable cause is found it will move to Circuit Court, NO plea arrangements have been discussed.
Burn him! I have a bat for him.
ReplyDelete... she was told not to be sulfides if he gets convicted...
ReplyDeleteWhat exactly does this mean? I do not understand it.
1:00 pm - Sulfide-A compound of a nonmetallic element that exists in several allotropic forms including yellow orthorhombic crystals and some other element that is more electropositive. Clearly not the correct spelling for whatever word this person was trying to use. My guess "Surprised"
ReplyDeleteTo the Author: Why on Earth was your child alone with an adult male that is not related??? My children would never be alone with an unrelated adult male. What he did was very wrong, but you have a responsibilty to protect your children at ALL costs. In this day and age you cannot trust ANYONE, especially people who are not blood related. You are asking for trouble when you condone this type of situation/environment.
1:00 why even post a stupid coment about a missed spelled words I understand Your an idiot
ReplyDeleteMisspellings aside, why would you EVER let your little girl around an unrelated male,unsupervised,for ANY reason?
ReplyDelete@ndre it seems YOU are the idiot since you do not know the difference between your and you're. When I read the article I paused at that same word. Some people unlike you ask questions because they truly want answers and they are not being a jerk like you just were.
ReplyDeleteAnd, @ndre, it's "misspelled." Spelling SHOULD count in assessing one's intelligence. If someone posts a comment like @ndre's, his intelligence is at once questioned. If he cannot compose a coherent sentence, then anything he writes we tend to ignore, even if the substance is warranted.
ReplyDeleteAs far as the original post is concerned, I have a problem with airing the name of someone who hasn't gone to trial yet. It is conceivable that he could be found not guilty. If that is so, then you, the writer, could be in legal trouble.
Does anyone ever stay on topic? I doubt the writer of the letter cares about Mr and Mrs Perfect causing a flack over using correct English and spelling. Unless the mistake is a sensational gaff I am sure 99% of the time we know what the persons mean.
ReplyDeleteMay I just add that Thomas Legg's ex-wife cried out for help way before he struck his next victim, the beloved Sarah Foxwell.Legal or not making the public aware of a possible situation of this nature is profound in my book. About misspelling of words,is petty, people's ignorance-petty. The foundation of what the writter is trying to make people aware of and ask for others to come forth to protect our children should not go ignored or crusified. Like so many of you I am bothered why the writer would just be finding out about her 10 year in a grown man's bed with the door locked. However that is her issue she has to answer to when filing a complaint because wouldn't that be considered endangering the welfare of a child? I am just saying. You can rip me apart, it's all good. But please lets stay focus here, there is yet another possible prediator on the prowl???? and let's never forget Ms.Sarah Foxwell. R.I.P. if nothing else lets for her name sake protect, investigate and futher more you single mothers out here stop letting every tom, dick and harry around your blessing(children) from GOD... Adult book store around the damn corner.
ReplyDeleteWOW @ndre! I'm an idiot for asking a question?!? Seems quite juvenile. I wasn't sure if that word was some sort of legal jargon. Since I have never been involved in any legal issues I was simply unfamiliar with the term. But I do know how to spell "comment" and "misspelled", as well when to use "you're" vs. "Your".
ReplyDeleteSince that has been cleared up, and my question was answered (thank you very much to 1:31pm), to what lengths has the person who wrote this letter gone to in order to bring the issue with her daughter to the attention of the authorities? Have they gone in person to file a complaint? Or just made phone calls? Squeaky wheel gets the oil. Go stand in front of someone's desk and make yourself, and your complaint, known until someone pays attention if you feel this man had inappropriate actions around your daughter. Do not drop the ball because he will just turn around and do the same thing to someone else's kid.
WHY I ask myself DOES people feel the Gov. needs to protect their kids ??? IT is the parents job to protect their kids if they are in fact REAL parents. But I guess they felt warm fuzzy safe as he was not on the sex offenders list so all was good to let him lay in bed with a door locked with their daughter and they not know where she was at all times ??? So let this be a lesson that the warm fuzzy feel safe sex offenders list is a waste of time and money and would have not stopped this crime or sadly enough had not stopped the Sarah Foxwell death "as he was on the list and was still allowed access to the poor girl and at one time had keys to the house by the MOTHER i heard...PEOPLE stop thinking the Gov. is going to protect and raise your kids and to it yourself.
ReplyDeleteHis name is on the public records Look on the maryland judicial system case search
ReplyDeleteI know for a fact He took a lie detector test Failed Then confessed to at all
ReplyDeleteMy daughter was never left alone with this man. She was at a sleep over at their house. There were six other girls there for the weekend. I do apologize I took it wrong the first comment I really thought someone was being smart. The word was surprised and I sure am surprised at how much attention that got. The states attorney has called along with the child advocacy center. That's all I wanted.
ReplyDelete