DelMarVa's Premier Source for News, Opinion, Analysis, and Human Interest Contact Publisher Joe Albero at alberobutzo@wmconnect.com or 410-430-5349
DelMarVa's Premier Source for News, Opinion, Analysis, and Human Interest Contact Publisher Joe Albero at alberobutzo@wmconnect.com or 410-430-5349
i have no interest in hearing the junk that spews from those jurors. they did not do their job. plus she's been arrested for check fraud and suspended license. who cares what she has to say. nothing any of them say will convince me they took this seriously.maybe they are just super ignorant.
ReplyDeleteThere was a lot of talk today at work regarding the outcome of this trial.
ReplyDeleteMany that were disgusted about the verdict were the exact same people that just knew OJ Simpson was inncocent.
The prosecution doesn't have to prove a cause of death! The little girl didn't put herself in the bag and toss herself in the swamp. She was last seen alive with her mother, and then her bag of bones showed up down the road, meanwhile Casey is out partying, getting tattoo's that mean "beautiful life." Hmm, sounds like motive to me! Also, it seems the jury lacks common sense. While there was a lot of circumstantial evidence, it is still EVIDENCE and needs to be reviewed. They didn't callback for any of the evidence. Bunch of morons.
ReplyDelete"the prosecution doesn't have to prove a cause of death!"
ReplyDeleteOh Yeah!!! Really!!! Anon 657.
PLEASE THINK!!!! And quit on what you THINK MAY HAVE HAPPENED.
The CAUSE of death is very important! To say the manner of death is homicide and then say the cause is undetermined is mutually exclusive.
You didn't listen to the evidence as presented. No need to "callback" what was disputed and disproved.
Mob mentality fueled by the likes of HLN, and Nancy Grace.
ReplyDeleteI'm shocked our local people are buying into it. I thought you all were smarter.
Anon 8:12 CAUSE of death doesn't legally have to be proven, there have been convictions without it before. Scott Peterson case ring a bell? The MANNER of death was listed on her death certificate as homicide because that's what this case is. Murderers shouldn't be rewarded because they're able to hide their victims long enough that they decompose so badly to the point a cause of death can't be determined. Also they don't have to prove a motive. Although I argue the prosecution presented a great motive. And I find it amusing you would criticize the other poster for supposedly speculating what happened when that's exactly what the jury did here. They speculated it could've been an accident when no evidence was presented to come to that conclusion. Just the opening statement which is not evidence!
ReplyDeleteThe jury didn't do their job?! I'm sorry but you are a giant idiot.
ReplyDeleteAnd a close second is the dope who said the don't have to prove a cause of death.
People's stupidity just keeps hitting new highs. I don't expect any of you to be experts of law but damn, no common sense either.
You can't separate your emotions from logic. No one heard everything the jury did and even what was available to the public you didn't bother to listen to.
You are such an embarrassment.
Of course the cause of death is important, sadly they found Caylee too late to determine how she died. The death was deemed a homicide because toddlers who die naturally don't show up in trash bags in swamps with duct tape around their skulls. So how about you two above commenters use YOUR heads and figure how the child got there. And Nancy Grace fuels none of my mentality, the girl clearly showed a toddler cramped her lifestyle, with or without what any newscaster had to say. Period blank. It's idiots like you two is why the girl will walk and most likely do something of the sort again. Lacking any form of gumption whatsoever. Can't see the forest for the trees!
ReplyDeleteWhy on earth did you think that?
ReplyDeleteThe Scott Peterson case rings a bell clearly to me anon 924. If it rang a bell clearly in your head you would recall the evidence in the Peterson case. It what you call REAL circumstancial evidence.
ReplyDeleteHe had a mistress who he had told his wife had died. (motive)
He told his inlaws and others he was out playing golf when if fact a receipt showed he had lauched his boat the morning he had reported his wife missing. (opportuntiy)
Receipts were found confirming he had purchase bags of cement prior to his wife's disappearance and he had no explantion of where these bags of cement were used.
No the cause of death doensn't have to be "legally" proven but the state better well have their cards in order with more than phantom evidence to bring on first degree murder charges against someone.
Justice was served and I'm sorry for all those who are clueless and do not understand we are a nation in which all are protected by something called a Constitution and according to that document the burden of proof is on the state and that burden must be proved beyond a reasonable doubt.
If you all remember, there was a case in Ocean City years ago, where a woman had new born babies skeletons stashed in her home. Well guess what? Cause of death could not be established. Guess what again? The murder charges that were filed were dropped. Thank God the former Worcester County States Attorney knew charges like that would never stick and dismissed them. Jurors don't make their decisions on emotions and maybes and could of happened...jurors make their decisions on evidence and if it's not there the verdict is not guilty.
All the state did was speculate when you get right down to it. What did it for me was defense witness Dr Spitz (who's done 60,000plus autopsies) saying the lack of discoloration in a certain part of the skull near the ears is present when suffocation occurs and it wasn't present in Caylees's skull. I would have felt better if Dr G would have atleast made an attempt to do this. To me her testimony was pure theatrics.
ReplyDeleteCouldn't "prove" a murder was committed??? What about that poor little body in 2 bags with the duct tape all around her head?
ReplyDeleteIDIOTS! One supposes the jurors to possess a modicum of common sense!
It all over, forget about it and move on, she'll get her's in the end and maybe while she's out walking around in public, there are a lot of crazy people out there that will act on their emotions.
ReplyDeleteThe assistant medical examiner, Dr Schultz who was the first on the case (until Dr G got wind and fly back to FL) refused to rule the child's death a homicide. Dr G reassigned herself to the case and deemed the manner of death homicide shortly thereafter. Dr Schultz is loyal to forensic pathology whereas Dr G is only loyal to public opinion and her own TV ratings.
ReplyDelete"Some where a village is missing 12 idiots."
ReplyDeleteIdiot, Idiots, Idiot, Idiots!!!
ReplyDeleteWhy wasn't this B!!ch at least charged with child abuse? You
don't know where your daughter is for a month! You leave your child or animal in a car alone for a moment and people are outraged. and this
Whor@ doesn't know where Caylee is.
12:49, Child abuse charges wouldn't have worked, maybe more something along the lines of neglect for not reporting Caylee missing.
ReplyDeleteThere's no reason for anyone to be upset with the jurors. The blame lies with an overzealous prosecution, no doubt politically motivated.
Anthony SHOULD only have been charges with neglect and maybe obstruction of justice and the murder charges SHOULD have been left to lie for awhile, when no doubt more evidence would have surfaced.
George Anthony tesified to seeing Casey and Caylee leaving on June 16 which is false. The day before (Father's Day) Cindy had a run in with Casey which according to Cindy's family members turned physical and sometime during the night while her parents were asleep Casey took Caylee and left. This was told to investigators by Cindy's brother who was relayed the info from their mother. This was never brought out in trial because it's considered hearsay and Cindy was sticking to the made up story.
This is all online along with thousands of other documents and interviews related to the case for anyone to read.
I am firm in my belief had Casey not been locked away from the beginning Cindy would have cracked due to the pressure and perhaps have come clean with investigators.