A sharply divided Supreme Court Monday affirmed a controversial prisoner reduction plan forced on California prison administrators that requires the state to reduce its inmate population by tens-of-thousands to ease overcrowding.
The 5-4 decision authored by Justice Anthony Kennedy, a California native, is a wholesale acceptance of a ruling by a special three-judge panel tasked with resolving chronic overcrowding in the state's penal system. The February 2009 decision orders California to reduce its prison population that has at times run nearly double its capacity. Approximately 37,000 to 46,000 inmates will have to be released in order for the state to comply with the ruling.
"After years of litigation, it became apparent that a remedy for the constitutional violations would not be effective absent a reduction in the prison system population," Kennedy wrote in an opinion joined by the court's more liberal members. In an unusual occurrence, the opinion included an appendix showing three pictures of the overcrowded facilities.
Critics of California's prison system contend the cells are so overrun with inmates that proper care has been obliterated. Kennedy cites examples of prisoners with mental or physical health needs having to wait months for inadequate care. He cites one example of an inmate who was held for nearly 24 hours in a cage and standing in a pool of his own urine. Others died while seeking medical attention that was seemingly delayed because of the backlog of cases.
More
Lovely, more votes for ol' what's his name!! Just what we need! :(
ReplyDeleteWouldn't it be nice if the St Andreas fault split and california went out to sea , way out and then sunk. End of this countries major problems.
ReplyDeleteMaybe we can give them scholarships so they will stay busy going to school for free instead of doing bad things.
ReplyDeleteSounds like they need more prison space. They have a rather large, but empty facility that could be used --- Alcatraz? Send `em all out there!!
ReplyDeleteThe Obama girls in action on the Supreme Court; next is take away your law abiding guns.
ReplyDelete