A new, more expansive version of South Dakota's "justifiable homicide" bill, which reproductive rights supporters believed would legalize the killing of abortion providers, has been reintroduced in Nebraska's state legislature, Mother Jones reports. Introduced by state Sen. Mark Christensen, the bill reaches beyond South Dakota's proposal of allowing a woman, her husband, or her family to commit "justifiable homicide" in defense of a fetus, and instead would apply those same protections to any third party. "LB 232 is really nothing more than an attempt to make sure a pregnant woman is not unnecessarily charged with a crime for using force to protect her unborn child from someone who means to bring harm to her unborn children," Christensen said. ACLU lobbyist Alan Peterson said, "If they wanted it that narrow, they should have drafted it that way, and they did not. I have reasonable suspicion that the intent was at least to create a possible broad defense for attacks on abortion providers."
I might not be reading enough news, but I missed all those reports of pregnant women having to defend themselves from people trying to hurt the baby in their womb. Are there THAT many pregnant women who are packing a piece, or who are able duke it out in a deadly battle to save their baby?? And are there THAT many people going around looking to attack pregnant women with the intention of killing the baby in their belly? REALLY??? Christensen sounds a little whack to me and like a typical politician, believes that because he says something, it must be right and reasonable. Politicians, especially MALE politicians, need to focus on something else.
ReplyDeleteThis law is about making it legal to attempt to kill abortion doctors. The third party protection is the key - you don't have to be the pregnant woman to exercise the right to use deadly force. South Dakota is trying to make it legal to kill abortion doctors.
ReplyDelete