THE CARE BILL HB3200
THIS IS THE 2ND OFFICIAL WHO HAS OUTLINED THESE PARTS OF THE CARE BILLJudge Kithil of Marble Falls , TX - HB3200 highlighted pages most egregiousPlease read this........ especially the reference to pages 58 & 59JUDGE KITHIL wrote:** Page 50/section 152: The bill will provide insurance to all non-U.S. residents, even if they are here illegally.** Page 58 and 59: The government will have real-time access to an individual's bank account and will have the authority to make electronic fund transfers from those accounts.** Page 65/section 164: The plan will be subsidized (by the government) for all union members, union retirees and for community organizations (such as the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now - ACORN).** Page 203/line 14-15: The tax imposed under this section will not be treated as a tax. (How could anybody in their right mind come up with that?)** Page 241 and 253: Doctors will all be paid the same regardless of specialty, and the government will set all doctors' fees.** Page 272. section 1145: Cancer hospital will ration care according to the patient's age.** Page 317 and 321: The government will impose a prohibition on hospital expansion; however, communities may petition for an exception.** Page 425, line 4-12: The government mandates advance-care planning consultations. Those on Social Security will be required to attend an "end-of-life planning" seminar every five years. (Death counseling..)** Page 429, line 13-25: The government will specify which doctors can write an end-of-life order.HAD ENOUGH???? Judge Kithil then goes on:
"Finally, it is specifically stated that this bill will not apply to members of Congress. Members of Congress are already exempt from the Social Security system, and have a well-funded private plan that covers their retirement needs. If they were on our Social Security plan, I believe they would find a very quick 'fix' to make the plan financially sound for their future." Honorable David Kithil
Marble Falls, Texas
Obama is a disgrace!
ReplyDeleteThe health care bill is awful and should be repealed....that's the bottom line. However, almost all of the citings in this post are false. I hate it when people use false information to prove their point. When this is done, it invalidates the REAL reasons of why the health care bill is so wrong. A post like this is such a shame.
ReplyDeletePlease explain what's false. Have you read the bill?
ReplyDeleteFor example: You claim that section 1145 will deny coverage for cancer based on age. However, section 1145 is three paragraphs long and never mentions the word or concept of "age." It says that if an outpatient cancer clinic charges more than a regular hospital would for the same procedure, the expenditure increase may be approved. Here is that section in it's entirety:
Delete1145. TREATMENT OF CERTAIN CANCER HOSPITALS.
Section 1833(t) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395l(t)) is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
`(18) AUTHORIZATION OF ADJUSTMENT FOR CANCER HOSPITALS-
`(A) STUDY- The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine if, under the system under this subsection, costs incurred by hospitals described in section 1886(d)(1)(B)(v) with respect to ambulatory payment classification groups exceed those costs incurred by other hospitals furnishing services under this subsection (as determined appropriate by the Secretary).
`(B) AUTHORIZATION OF ADJUSTMENT- Insofar as the Secretary determines under subparagraph (A) that costs incurred by hospitals described in section 1886(d)(1)(B)(v) exceed those costs incurred by other hospitals furnishing services under this subsection, the Secretary shall provide for an appropriate adjustment under paragraph (2)(E) to reflect those higher costs effective for services furnished on or after January 1,
I have read it, and these items are true. It really needs to be thrown out. The republican's offer of November 2008(?), I believe, is very understandable and sensible. However, it never made the table.
ReplyDeleteI urge everyone to read both.
"Judge" Kithil: In your efforts to deny coverage to others, you are a liar.
ReplyDelete1. HR 3200 is not the bill that was passed. The bill that was passed, was 67% changed.
2. The claims you make about HR 3200 are outright lies. For example: You claim that section 1145 will deny coverage for cancer based on age. However, section 1145 is three paragraphs long and never mentions the word or concept of "age." It says that if an outpatient cancer clinic charges more than a regular hospital would for the same procedure, the expenditure increase may be approved. Here is that section in it's entirety:
1145. TREATMENT OF CERTAIN CANCER HOSPITALS.
Section 1833(t) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395l(t)) is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
`(18) AUTHORIZATION OF ADJUSTMENT FOR CANCER HOSPITALS-
`(A) STUDY- The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine if, under the system under this subsection, costs incurred by hospitals described in section 1886(d)(1)(B)(v) with respect to ambulatory payment classification groups exceed those costs incurred by other hospitals furnishing services under this subsection (as determined appropriate by the Secretary).
`(B) AUTHORIZATION OF ADJUSTMENT- Insofar as the Secretary determines under subparagraph (A) that costs incurred by hospitals described in section 1886(d)(1)(B)(v) exceed those costs incurred by other hospitals furnishing services under this subsection, the Secretary shall provide for an appropriate adjustment under paragraph (2)(E) to reflect those higher costs effective for services furnished on or after January 1, 2011.'.
You, are a liar!