Popular Posts

Friday, January 07, 2011

Sarah Foxwell Case In Very Good Hands

After spending two days in Elkton, Maryland, if there's one thing I can confidently come home with is that the Sarah Foxwell case is in very good hands. Present on the first day was Sarah's Father Tommy, Sarah's Aunt Tracey and Sarah's Grandmother Joanne and her husband Fred. On the second day, Jennifer Foxwell attended. Sarah's Aunt Amy was not present on either day.

Let me assure you, the defense attorneys, (4 of them) are extremely long winded and day after day of listening to repetitive questions asked and answered by Detectives and Officers in this case, (in my honest opinion) the defense attorneys are attempting to make a mockery of this case.

Yesterdays suppression hearing, (which was supposed to be completed in one day) has now been extended until January 26th. Quite a bit of arguing went on because the defense attorneys representing Thomas Leggs continued to challenge the key eye witness testimony, claiming they had Fetal Alcohol Syndrome and other major disabilities. Once this information came out, Sarah's mother Jennifer Foxwell became very emotional and excused herself from the Court Room.

Their defense was, how could this witness pick Leggs out of a line up, (all named Tommy) when he was familiar to that household and family. While this may be true, the State stated that the witness hadn't seen Thomas Leggs for a minimum of 30 days AND that the witness testified Leggs was the person who removed Sarah Foxwell from the home the evening of December 22nd 2009.

The defense wanted the lineup removed from the case but a final decision couldn't be made by the honorable Judge as this hearing was simply going on too long and couldn't be completed that day.

There was a lot of time spent on the cell phone issues as well. While the defense kept picking at straws on a total of three cell phones, two of them were non working cell phones. There's still much more to cover in this suppression hearing and one can only wonder how long this trial will actually take, especially when you have so many long winded defense attorneys.

This is just the beginning and let me assure you, sitting on hard oak benches for several hours at a time is just not something many would be very comfortable with. That being said, I sat and wondered why the accused was allowed to sit in a cushioned and comfortable seat while the victims were subjected to hard oak benches. It just doesn't seem very fair.

More to come........

48 comments:

  1. call a spade a spade!January 7, 2011 at 10:40 AM

    "After spending two days in Elkton, Maryland, if there's one thing I can confidently come home with is that the Sarah Foxwell case is in very good hands."

    Too bad Sarah foxwell wasn't in good hands!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Atonement will come for all of us, some by choice others not.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I thought about her on Christmas day alot, didnt bring it up but watching my grand babies opening presents and enjoying the day she crossed my mind, had to excuse myself and go in the bathroom to get the tears out.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Was Jennifer Foxwell emotional because she knows she drank during her pregnancy with her children. Or was she emotional because she is now 6 months pregnant with another child. By the way. She's still drinking and smoking while pregnant with her next child. When will she ever learn.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Some people never do.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Drinking and smoking had nothing to do with what happened to Sarah. She is still a Mom. Leggs was going to get that child no matter what. This family has suffered enough. We all make mistakes

    ReplyDelete
  7. If the guilt has not driven her to the edge of madness then she has no conscience. Now she has entered the abyss, very few can handle that. Very few ever make it back from there.

    ReplyDelete
  8. WBOC, Delmarva's news leader?

    WMDT, More news in less time?

    I get my news from Salisbury News.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Who is paying for 4 (FOUR) defense attorneys???

    ReplyDelete
  10. Sadly, Joe stated that the "Defense Attorney's are making a Mockery out of this case"
    The four defense attorney's will meet their maker on judgement day
    for making a Mockery out of the pointless death of a child.

    ReplyDelete
  11. 11:44 - Very true! I watched WBOC news, and there wasn't any "news". Except for a clip on bed bugs, a man who golfs, and a non-informational segman on the weather. This is the only place to come to for real news. I wouldn't be surprised if WBOC comes to this blog for ideas on news stories.

    ReplyDelete
  12. As much as most of us would like to smash his skull in with a cinder block the defense attr are doing there jobs. Everone in this country is entitled to a proper defense, including this piece of garbage. The attr will do everything they can to have reasons for appeal later.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Regardless of what her mother did or is doing No man should ever touch a child. Absolutly sick. He should be killed. It is what it is. Touch a child and die. The thought of what that poor girl went through that night sickens me. Stop knocking Jennifer beacuse i am sure alot of you... us drink...SEXUAL ASSULT ESPECIALLY OF A CHILD IS A DEMENTED SICK MIND AND THIS MUST STOP!!!!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  14. He should have been thrown in the general population while awaiting trial. We wouldn't be talking about his trial right now. I hope our tax dollars aren't paying for 4 defense lawyers.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Joe: This is a death penalty case and the problem with death penalty cases is that for the next 20 years this case will be picked apart in both state and federal courts for the slightest error. The first thing Leggs will do on appeal is argue that his attorneys were incompetent. Hell, F. Lee Bailey was post-convicted. If the attorneys do not ask every question, object to all evidence offered by the state, fail to file any motion, regardless of how frivolous it may seem, some court somewhere, will give Leggs a new trial and we can all go through this again.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Defending a person is one thing making a mockery out of this case
    is frightening.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Court always seems like a mockery, its the process. The entire criminal system is frightening.

    ReplyDelete
  18. "Innocent until proven guilty"
    mean anything to you people?

    ReplyDelete
  19. whoo hoo i cant wait to start paying for her new baby......tie her tubes it will be cheaper in the long run

    ReplyDelete
  20. 3:30, really? Are you really going to go there?

    ReplyDelete
  21. Is Jennifer Foxwell seriously pregnant? And does she have another child with Fetal Alcohol Syndrome?

    Can we take up a collection to pay for her tubal? Stop the cycle. Will this next child also be taken care of by someone else? You would think that woman would have gotten the awakening she needed. Apparently not.

    ReplyDelete
  22. 11:19 AM

    Why do you have to be so mean? You are a sinner just like everyone else. Dragging someone down to your level won't bring you up.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Who is paying for 4 (FOUR) defense attorneys???

    12:32 PM

    I hope our tax dollars aren't paying for 4 defense lawyers.

    1:21 PM

    WE, the public, are paying for the defense attys. Hence the name, public defenders.

    We pay whenever anyone uses a public defender.

    They are doing their JOB. The states atty. will do his JOB. The jury will do their JOB.

    Sorry to say but some of you have no class.

    ReplyDelete
  24. When will she ever learn.

    11:19 AM

    Maybe never. But you and your 'friends' will keep trying to teach her I bet.

    ReplyDelete
  25. "Innocent until proven guilty"
    mean anything to you people?

    3:30 PM

    Ah, a lone voice in the wilderness. No sir, I don't think it does mean anything to them.

    They show no understanding of due process. They seem only to be trying to outdo each other on their ignorant statements.

    But I'm sure we are both wasting our breath.

    ReplyDelete
  26. 11:19.... How do you get off saying shes still drinking during this pregancy? jennifer has been through enough losing 2 children and having to live in the judgment of others. everyone makes mistakes. i think you should focus on the real matter here: sarah was brutally murdered and rapped. leggs needs to hang for this horrific crime agaisnt this poor little girl that was probably never exposed to the horrid feelings that make you say these evil things about her mother. shame on you! let her deal with this tragity the best she can till this trial is over. she reliving that night over and over. and as for her new pregnacy, SHES NOT DRINKING!

    ReplyDelete
  27. Jennifer was recently evicted from her last residence in Pittsville. This was the second time she was in the process but her church bvailed her out and refused to help her this time. Jennifer is smoking and drinking and this will be her 10th child with at least 5 different fathers. She should stay away from Station 7 happy hour if she wants to hide her drinking problem.

    ReplyDelete
  28. 6:11, I know that public defenders are paid by tax dollars, but seriously, 4 of them??? I am no expert of the legal system, maybe 4 public defenders is standard on a death penalty trial. I do agree, attacking Jennifer and even the public defenders lacks class and is uncalled for. Whether they want to or not, the public defenders have to do their job and I am sure they are put in some "difficult situations" that I wouldn't want to be in.

    As far as the understanding of due process, yes, he is innocent until proven guilty, however, in my opinion, I have a hunch he is guilty. I have faith in the State's Attorney and believe they probably have a sound case since they waited so long to indict him with murder 1 and are going for the death penalty.

    ReplyDelete
  29. Well it is truly sad that Sarah had to lose her life cause of that sick man.. but her mother put her in that situation by leaving sarah with her aunt and leggs was dating sarahs aunt Now bringing another child in this world for other people to raise..is just wrong the state should make her have a tubal done

    ReplyDelete
  30. I wish the personal attacks on this lady would not be posted, doesn't she have enough to deal with? I don't have confidence in the charges, SA or evidence. I think the DA's are probably experts in different areas and will attack things to either win the case when it goes to trial or make a case for future appeals. If this guy is guilty and gets off on a technicality, it will be sad. If he gets off on poor evidence, shame on Lewis and the LEO's. If he gets off on strategy after we have retained the SA as a special prosecuter, shame on us. I'll be glad when this is over. Still praying for the family. They are the ones most affected by this terrible event.

    ReplyDelete
  31. At 5:18 am- Why would she get a tubal? She wouldn't be able to get all the welfare that our tax dollara are paying for. I have read many comments about how we are all sinners and being judgemental towards her. Whatever. I know that we are all sinners but when does one learn from their mistakes. I am tired of people like her sponging off tax dollars and bringing children into the world that have FAS. She is disgusting and a disgrace to that innocent girls memory!!!

    ReplyDelete
  32. 8:52 PM

    I don't know the thinking behind 4 defense lawyers either. Maybe because it's such a serious charge and they are seeking the death penalty or leaving no chance for appeal on incompetent representation.

    I want to thank you on your polite response. That is beginning to be a rare thing on this site.

    ReplyDelete
  33. She is disgusting and a disgrace to that innocent girls memory!!!

    9:03 AM

    You really shouldn't throw stones.

    ReplyDelete
  34. sin all you want i dont care..........just dont ask me to pay for it

    ReplyDelete
  35. Since when has the government asked you to pay for sin? They don't ask for or need your permission.
    Do you need a ladder to feed that high horse of yours?

    ReplyDelete
  36. Joe, by your own comments you have proven you have no understanding of the legal system, so you certainly are not the one to be saying the "case is in good hands".

    What is your purpose of posting all the vile comments against Sarah's Mother? Her only involvement seems to be she birthed Sarah. I see no need to post all the gossip for Sarah's siblings and siblings school friends to read. Those children have enough to endure without you adding fuel to the fire. Just my opinion.

    ReplyDelete
  37. anonymous 10:14, let me start off by saying this. Considering you are anonymous, more than likely you are one of the anti bloggers trying to stir the pot.

    It's called my 1st amendment right. I have the right to express whatever I heard and I even have the right to my opinion. I have been very careful in what I have chosen to express. If you have a problem with it and you're such a good friend of Jennifer Foxwell, perhaps the next time around you'll take the time to be there as a sign of support.

    As for the comments coming in against Jennifer. That too is every one's right to freedom of speech. Jennifer Foxwell personally lied to me about her being pregnant and in fact cursed me out for allowing such comments. I expressed in that post under comments that Jennifer denied being pregnant, yet she told several people she was, all of which I personally know, believe and trust.

    Jennifer Foxwell does NOT have custody of her children and there's a very good reason why.

    I have helped Jennifer Foxwell for the last time. I have protected Jennifer Foxwell for the last time. At her age she should know better. Jennifer is on her own.

    Before anyone else is used, the public should be well aware of her past.

    ReplyDelete
  38. "Her only involvement seems to be she birthed Sarah" Hmmm and that doesnt seem to be a problem to you.Just maybe if she would have been more involved her daughter would still be here.The week of Christmas WBOC did an interview with Jennifer Foxwell and they said her daughter had said she wanted to be a reporter.Then went on to ask her if Sarah were doing the interview what did she think Sarah would ask.I dont remember what the "Mother Of The Year" anwser was but I think she would have asked ...........Where were you mommy? Where were you?

    ReplyDelete
  39. 10:13......your right the goverment doesnt ask me to pay for others sins however they do force me to everytime i get my paycheck but i doubt you would know much about that i dont have a high horse i also dont have kids i cant pay for nor do i live off welfare or the kindness of others whatever we get we pay for its a little known concept called a job all im saying is my hands are not in your pocket keep yours out of mine

    ReplyDelete
  40. 10:27 Joe,I am not an anti blogger. I would not know Jennifer Foxwell if I stumbled over her.
    Yes I do have a problem with the fact that Foxwell only birthed the children, but I also have a problem that those precious children could be reading these statements against their mother. Kids can be cruel and classmates will be gossiping over these statements.

    Sarah's siblings have had a rough time and I see no reason to fuel the flames. Yes you have first admendment rights, but I was hoping where children are concerned you would consider them first and foremost. You are not hurting Jennifer with your remarks - you are hurting the children.

    Just my opinion. We each are entitled to one and neither of us is wrong for expressing an opinion.

    ReplyDelete
  41. Granny, tell that to Jonathan Taylor and the others who choose to use my Grandson's name in their posts.

    I have spoken the truth and I have allowed the TRUTH to be expressed on here. There have been other comments that were not the truth that have been rejected.

    Jennifer Foxwell needs to start telling the TRUTH for once her her damn life and start acting responsible for once in her life. She has used and abused far too many kind hearted people who continue to clean up her mess after she has used them.

    The Albero Family has given enough as well as our friends and resources.

    As I stated earlier, Jennifer Foxwell is now on her own. No more covering up for what she has done and continues to do. I'm confident her children are not reading this Blog.

    ReplyDelete
  42. ....your right the goverment doesnt ask me to pay for others sins however they do force me to everytime i get my paycheck

    that was my point.

    but i doubt you would know much about that i dont have a high horse

    u assume too much and you still are acting like ur on a high horse.

    ReplyDelete
  43. There seems to be problems and strife whenever you have a post about the Foxells and anything related to them.

    Just brings out the worse in people. One wants to be selective about how his taxes are used. He doesn't seem to know how government and society operates.

    Bigots and rednecks abound on the shore so it shouldn't be a shock.

    ReplyDelete
  44. Joe. I live in Cecil County. I sat on those benches for a murder trial. Take a cushion. It makes the day much softer.

    ReplyDelete
  45. Four defense attorneys - an educated guess would be that one is an expert in capital crimes cases, one is an expert in Constitutional Law, one would be responsible for jury selection and the final guy is probably the lead guy pulling it all together. And yes, he is innocent until proven guilty. I hope there is DNA evidence because Maryland will not be putting him on death row if it is not there.
    David

    ReplyDelete
  46. How could someone evict in during this trying time and this economy don't say much about helping one in need..

    ReplyDelete
  47. anonymous 6:40, I'll tell you how. She didn't pay rent for at least 6 months, not with her own earned income. The owner of the property can only take so much as they have payments to make as well and have to answer to the bank.

    If you follow her history, this landlord is extremely lucky they didn't have their property destroyed.


    The last evection was actually around Christmas Day, believe it or not. She conned her Church into paying her back rent after she had been in jail for not paying child support.

    My name is on this comment because right is right.

    ReplyDelete
  48. smarter than you thinkJanuary 9, 2011 at 10:16 PM

    sarah has always been the one to pay for jennifers life style. along with her other 4 children. jennifer makes the mess while others clean it up. thats been her life style her whole life.

    she takes off 2 to 3 days a week at work. but all we hear is " its not her fault". its always someone elses faught.

    joe, jennifer lies to everyone she talks to. truth is not in her way of talking. if everyone is under a gag order, then keep her out of the court room.. what she says is some truth, but with her spin on it.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.