Popular Posts

Thursday, November 18, 2010

Ron Paul: Stop This Soviet-Style Nonsense

With a week to go until the Thanksgiving travel peak and Americans' anger continuing to rise over heightened airport-security measures, a U.S. congressman launched legislation today to end what he calls Soviet-style searches by the American government.

Rep. Ron Paul, R-Texas, introduced the Air Traveler Dignity Act to protect Americans from physical and emotional abuse by federal Transportation Security Administration employees conducting screenings at the nation's airports.

"We have seen the videos of terrified children being grabbed and probed by airport screeners. We have read the stories of Americans being subjected to humiliating body imaging machines and/or forced to have the most intimate parts of their bodies poked and fondled," Paul said.

"This TSA version of our rights looks more like the 'rights' granted in the old Soviet Constitutions, where freedoms were granted to Soviet citizens – right up to the moment the state decided to remove those freedoms."

Paul's legislation, H.R. 6416, is just two sentences long, stating:

    No law of the United States shall be construed to confer any immunity for a federal employee or agency or any individual or entity that receives federal funds, who subjects an individual to any physical contact (including contact with any clothing the individual is wearing), X-rays, or millimeter waves, or aids in the creation of or views a representation of any part of a individual's body covered by clothing as a condition for such individual to be in an airport or to fly in an aircraft. The preceding sentence shall apply even if the individual or the individual's parent, guardian, or any other individual gives consent.

"My legislation is simple," Paul said. "It establishes that airport-security screeners are not immune from any U.S. law regarding physical contact with another person, making images of another person, or causing physical harm through the use of radiation-emitting machinery on another person. It means they are subject to the same laws as the rest of us."

Paul suggested the controversial screening techniques would vanish if top-ranking government officials were themselves subject to them.

"Imagine if the political elites in our country were forced to endure the same conditions at the airport as business travelers, families, senior citizens, and the rest of us. Perhaps this problem could be quickly resolved if every cabinet secretary, every member of Congress, and every department head in the Obama administration were forced to submit to the same degrading screening process as the people who pay their salaries."     

More

3 comments:

  1. Is this guy serious? He must never board any airplanes. I'd rather have my privacy invaded than be blown across a couple hundred miles.

    ReplyDelete
  2. 1:56 PM

    Yes he is serious. TSA has never caught a terrorist. And these methods will not either. They are way out of line with this.

    It is amazing what people will be allowed to be done to them without so much as a whimper.

    How traumatic do you think it is for little kids who have to go through this? But that is ok with you?

    ReplyDelete
  3. These measures do not protect anyone. They make the masses feel safe. Terrorists know they can go to a smaller airport (SBY) without the most up to date machines, get through and connect at a larger airport (PHL). More likely, it would be a package in the cargo of the plane rather than on a person. Do you realize how many people (contractors, temp workers, fuel delivery people) have access to airports and could plant something on a plane. Being groped or having naked pictures taken of me, my wife and children is not going to keep planes safe. What happens if the next bomber has the explosives in his butt? We get body cavity searches?

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.