Should Outsiders Be Involved In Reviewing Offenses On Doctors, Veterinarians, Lawyers & Police Officers?
DelMarVa's Premier Source for News, Opinion, Analysis, and Human Interest Contact Publisher Joe Albero at alberobutzo@wmconnect.com or 410-430-5349
du
ReplyDeleteNo let them review themselves, then they can surely get away with anything.
only if the outsiders are experts in the field being judged
ReplyDeleteYes they all serve the public....
ReplyDeleteGood idea. Make it happen.
ReplyDeleteonly if they're qualified.
ReplyDeleteFirst , define "outsiders"....what we should want are qualified objective people to do these kinds of investigations.
ReplyDeleteI think it is great. If you have nothing to hide. It also prevents nepatism. Lets face it if you are in you are in. If you are not part of the Good Ole Boy crew you pay the price. I would welcome it.
ReplyDeleteyes, 100%
ReplyDeleteif everyone was as honest as Sheriff Mike Lewis yes, but that's not the case so NO.
ReplyDeleteYes. As for officers, FOP lawyers are as useless as a basket of wet paper towels. SPD should know that.
ReplyDeleteIf they're competant, Heck Yes!
ReplyDeleteBased on your definition of outsider Joe, the answer is absolutely! Objectivity is paramount in these kinds of situations.
ReplyDeleteYes they should. As evidenced by the years of complaints and signs related to Dr. Bradley with nothing meaningful coming from it until way too late, the insiders will just cover for one another anyway.
ReplyDeleteOnly if the they are not the majority making of the review and in charge with any punishment. Most people can not truly know what these professions go through and do unless you are in that profession.
ReplyDelete