Wow!
President Barack Hussein Obama has yet another new distinction:
Under his watch, we have both Jihadist Muslims and Americans attacking us in the homeland:
Nidal Malik Hasan (Fort Hood Massacre)
Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab (Underwear, Christmas-day bomber)
Joseph Stack (IRS Building Suicide Bomber)
Hey liberals, do you still believe the CHANGE you elected for us is good for America? If you do, then you are without a doubt delusional. See a shrink.
DelMarVa's Premier Source for News, Opinion, Analysis, and Human Interest Contact Publisher Joe Albero at alberobutzo@wmconnect.com or 410-430-5349
I guess that new military push in Afganistan is really pissinig them off.
ReplyDeleteWonder if this could have happened under another president's watch? Of course it could have.
ReplyDeleteUnfortunate but hardly new. Under Bush
ReplyDeleteThe 911 attack - andact of international terrorism
The Anthrax attack - commite by Bruce Ivins, an American
The Shoe bomber - International attack
DC Sniper Case - US grown terrorists
2002 attack on El Al ticket counter at Los Angeles International Airport - an international attack
Campus AAttack at UNC - probably both home grown and international
Thats just under the Bush Administration. Please check your facts before making such outlandish charges
Coulda, Shoulda, Woulda. Funny how you liberals always find excuses for mistakes.
ReplyDeleteThedsaddest part is, none of you even have a clue what responsibility and accountability is. Instead you make excuses and try to come up with things like you just did 8:14.
That's why you'll never succeed in life. Oh, you'll have a desk job moving from one business to the next, creating charts and telling business owners just how great a job you're doing for the company. Then they'll wake up, realize you're worthless and you'll be the kind of person they dismiss.
I guess OK city, Atlanta, and 2 WTC attacks don't count? Nor do abortion clinic bombings or the DC sniper?
ReplyDeleteNo one said it's never happened.
ReplyDeleteBecause the MSM won't headline it, we've chosen to introduce it to the public instead.
Maybe when this President takes these things serious we'll pat him on the back more. Maybe when he goers to the Press with a real Birth Cirtificate proving he's an America we'll grow to feel more comfortable with his leadership.
Until then, we'll remain sceptical and laugh at those of you who voted for him.
I find it funny how the progressives bunch all crime into the category of "terrorism" in order to give their argument weight. The D.C. Sniper(s) were serial killers not terrorists! Just because someones act places others in fear doesn't make them terrorists. When a bank robber pulls a gun and everyone in the bank is afraid does he become a domestic terrorist?
ReplyDeleteHowever, you do see the Police using terroristic threats in a lot of their cases any more?????
ReplyDeleteAmerican's are terrorists?
The CIA uses people of all races and nationalities.
ReplyDeleteOne may assume the CIA is behind ALL OF THE TERROR except for the incidents where Mossad created mass murder.
Wake up America. The enemy is inside the gates. Stop bickering over which one of these corrupt political parties is better at responding to problems created by the CIA. Both political parties are controlled by the international bankers. The MSM is owned by international bankers. Wake up please.
Dictioary .co defnition of terrorist
ReplyDeleteter·ror·ist /ˈtɛrərɪst/ Show Spelled[ter-er-ist] Show IPA
–noun
1.a person, usually a member of a group, who uses or advocates terrorism.
2.a person who terrorizes or frightens others.
3.(formerly) a member of a political group in Russia aiming at the demoralization of the government by terror.
4.an agent or partisan of the revolutionary tribunal during the Reign of Terror in France
All that I mentioned in my first post fall into this definition. A bank robber's sole prupose is to steal money, not terrorize. Terrorists unleash terror as there means to an end. They intend to gain political consession or gain political influence through their acts.
I do agree that these things can happen under any administration at any time. Terrorists tend to hate America in general, not just the president. However, Joe is right!
ReplyDeleteThe Ford Hood incident got a decent amount of coverage, but fizzled out rather quickly. The IRS bomber seemed to hardly get 30 seconds and I never even knew about this Christmas Day bomber incident!! I read and watch the news regularly so if I missed it, the majority of the nation missed it! You're right Joe, if you are going to report the news then report it all and cover it adequately!
hey joe, get with it will ya! it's not the msm any more,
ReplyDeleteit's the lsm.
lame stream media!
If the Conservatives in Congress would stop sending 4 Billion a year to Israel (a country perfectly capable of supporting itself) our threats would be a lot less. This was spoken straight out of the mouth of two Middle Eastern Ambassadors that spoke at Salisbury University. You're all about not spending well tell the Republican Congressmen to stop pushing for 4+ billion aid to Israel.
ReplyDeleteOK Jefferson. You Quoted a dictionary as printing "They intend to gain political consession or gain political influence through their acts."
ReplyDeleteWhat was it that the DC Sniper hoped to accomplish politically?
I understand the meaning of "terrorist" very well. I've used the definition to support arguments on other blogs.
There is a goal here. Progressives will continue to bunch more and more crimes under the title "terrorism" until the masses begin to believe that terrorism is the most common crime in the country. At that point the government will begin to further erode our constitutional rights at an accelerated pace with little opposition from the public because it will be done in the name of "public safety".
You should be ashamed to go under the nickname of "Jefferson"
Why so quick to blame the sitting President like this Joe?
ReplyDeleteWhat did Obama have to do with a guy in a battle with the IRS losing it?
Nothing.
Somebody else has pointed out several incidents which took place under Bush's watch. I'd like to add that not only did the anthrax attacks take place but the person(s) responsible have not been identified or caught.
I believe stuff like this has been going on for a LONG time but because we have more instant access to media now, including blogs like yours which report stuff the MSM doesn't, we are more aware. I think that is the only real difference.
All this MSM trashing yet most of Joe's stories (besides local issues) are pulled directly from the "MSM"! Whether directly from other real news sites or indirectly from AP news post.
ReplyDeleteHow about the fact that Obama has ordered more terrorists killed in Predator drone attacks along the Afghan/Pakistan border than Bush?
ReplyDeleteThat doesn't count either, I guess?
"OK Jefferson. You Quoted a dictionary as printing "They intend to gain political consession or gain political influence through their acts"
ReplyDeleteI did not quote this from a source, it is my opinion, not a definition. I have no idea what the DC sniper's political agenda, if any is or was. That is not the point. The point is the original article portrays this as the first President to experience domestic terrorism, which by my explanation is just not true. These kind of charges are accepted as truth by a small group of individuals who read or hear anything negative and take it as gospel because they, themselves are negative and cannot or will not think for themselves. I like to substatiate or unsubstatiate these mae up lies with fact. As for taking Jefferson as a name, whatever. I do feel it is better than anonymous, however.