Popular Posts

Thursday, December 31, 2009

Today's Survey Question


Do You Think Governor O'Malley Should Reconsider The Death Penalty Laws In Maryland?

48 comments:

  1. Reconsider is an understatement. The citizens of MD need to stand up and require a change in this law!!

    ReplyDelete
  2. I'm thinking your breaking news is that he already has because of the horror of the past week.
    As a Catholic I believe deciding between life & death is God's business, not mine. As a mother of six, who is weary of fighting our "culture" for my children's well-being, I'm praying for the grace to not cheer should the death penalty be restored.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Definitely. There was a letter to the editor in the DT today where someone suggest he go to the mortuary where her body is being autopsied and then attend the funeral. Then maybe he'd have a different outlook on things.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Absolutely and there needs to be (as Ron White says) an express lane for those who are without a shadow of a doubt guilty.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I think he should, but the current status is regarded as 'middle ground', and I think it would be a waste of time politically to pursue. Right now, Maryland DOES have the death penalty, but "only in capital cases with biological or DNA evidence of guilt, a videotaped confession, or a videotape linking the defendant to a homicide".

    ReplyDelete
  6. Absolutely and O'Malley should be voted OUT of office as well.

    He's a corrupt imbecile.

    ReplyDelete
  7. oh yes . what if this happened to one of theirs would they still feel the same way?

    ReplyDelete
  8. What the previous commenter said about O'Malley visiting Sarah's body is absolutely correct. A judge in Salisbury used to fine teenage driver's one night in the Emergency Room to let them see how the results of their actions could end up. He correctly assessed the situation that it would probably be the parents that paid the fine anyway. There is nothing like a hard dose of reality to wake somebody up. For the incorrigible sex offender, the death penalty is appropriate to protect society from them.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Absolutely and without doubt. Our Lord said it best - "An Eye for an Eye" - who are we to question HIS word?

    ReplyDelete
  10. No need for the death penalty just put the sex offenders in general population and let the internal 'criminal justice' system take care of them. In prison they are the lowest form of life there is and they most certainly will see to the proper treatment these scum deserve, no more protective custody or special treatment in jail.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Yes Maryland should use the death penalty. When these lowlifes commit these heinous acts they forfeit their right to life. I have a 2 and a 4 year old and would willingly be the switch man, and I would sleep like a baby at night. You mess with my kids you mess with my life.

    ReplyDelete
  12. ABSOLUTELY. I am tired of my tax dollars paying to keep these scum bags alive. I will compromise, no death penalty but they go into general population. Seems fair...They won't last long.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Yes. Leave the death penality in effect for maryland. Prison is too good for those individuals who commit horific crimes. They need to be put to death so they don't get out of prison and do the same thing to another innocent human being. Put them to death!!!

    ReplyDelete
  14. When there is absolutely NO doubt as to the offender's guilt - Yes!!Harming a child? - YES!!! An elderly citizen? YES! Law enforcement persons? YES!! The list as far as i'm concerned would be long.

    ReplyDelete
  15. He should report the return of public hangings.

    Its quick, and inexpensive. It could be viewed by many, either in person or on TV.

    Common sense should dictate that it should have an impact on reducing murder.

    ReplyDelete
  16. I agree hole heartedly with the DEATH penalty. Majority of these comments are insinuating only on the Child Abuse cases. I say on any murder or a crime that leads to disability also. Expand as evidence would justify such as the three strike law. Anyone who can only cope with life by committing crimes and being incarcerated needs to be put to death. Imagine the drop in crime and the drop in States budget. Which should mean drop in taxes.

    ReplyDelete
  17. I think the media should put the Governor, as well as all Maryland elected officals, on the hot seat and ask them directly what their stance is on the death penalty in light of little Sarah's death.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Death is cheaper than life in prison. Why should we have to keep paying for their crimes.

    ReplyDelete
  19. No to death penalty, YES to life without parole. AND, if the sentence is for 10 years they should serve 10 years. Period.

    ReplyDelete
  20. I have heard it costs more for a prisoner if they are on death row because of the cost of the appeals and such. I do like the idea of putting them in with all the other prisoners and let them take their chances there.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Let me preface my remarks by saying, first one must believe in God and the Holy Scriptures, and if so, we are shown that God approves of killing those that commit murder.

    Refer to Genesis Chapter 9, verse 6
    and Exodus Chapter 21, verse 12 and Chapter 22, verses 2-4.

    And as a believer, I am convinced in order to maintain a safe society the death penalty is God's mandate to us.

    Hopefully, Gov. O'Malley will become familiar with the referenced scripture and do the right thing in maintaining the death penalty for the citizens of the State of Maryland.

    ReplyDelete
  22. yes indeedmay then we would have less crime.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Absolutely!!! It would be great if we could expedite this process by convicting him and taking him straight to the death chamber.

    ReplyDelete
  24. 10:24
    Are you nuts? That is our tax money paying for these criminals to sit on their worthless A$$ in prison. They have free meals, free health care, etc... We have kids who do not even have health care & kids who may go to bed tonight w/o eating dinner. The prison system is OVER populated. These a$$holes should be put to death, they should not be allowed to commit these crimes & live to tell!
    SO... YES TO THE DEATH PENALTY

    ReplyDelete
  25. Absolutly and also reconsider everything else that he has done to destroy Maryland as well like raising taxes.

    ReplyDelete
  26. as loud as my internet voice can carry Y E S !!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  27. 10:47 well said .YES!!!

    ReplyDelete
  28. Yes! Enforce the death penalty particularly for murders, rapists, and child molesters!

    ReplyDelete
  29. I saw this cheesy horror movie with redneck zombies where they skinned a dude,alive and lowered him slowly into a bubbling vat of hot oil.Since we cant do anything cruel and unusual like that,then I am all for whatever death penalty the state deems "humane" for these bastards.I cant even afford health insurance but these ingrates get medical and dental treatment free until they die.Unless another prisoner gets them or they get a disease,they will live to a ripe old age inside prison walls.Bring back the death penalty!

    ReplyDelete
  30. It's okay if we forgive them. Just get even first. In cases such as child molesting & worse, getting even means getting rid of. Period.

    ReplyDelete
  31. Yes, But I hope come next November it will be Bob's decision.

    ReplyDelete
  32. No.
    Make prison a place you do not want to go to.
    What ever happen to hard labor for life?
    Im sure it would be a lot worse than death.
    No they do not deserve to die.
    They deserve to live the rest of there life in living hell.
    Dont make prisons a hotel , make them prisons.
    No we should not support them , if they cannot support them selves with the labor they do, let em starve.

    ReplyDelete
  33. I have to agree with utilizing the death penalty. As a mother who is surviving the attempted murder of my daughter a year ago in the Booth street apartments. I think and always will feel that you take a life in a criminal manner, you lose your life. My daughter's life is over, she is comotose will never regain anything,unfortunately she is breathing on her own but that is all she is doing. eventually her organs will give way, her body will reject the feeding tube and she will however be in internal life. To me she is already there. Sorry Joe, I had to let my feelings flow. Thanks, Michele of Delmar

    ReplyDelete
  34. Hell yeah! Some people (dirt bags) just need to die!

    ReplyDelete
  35. One person suggested public hangings. I'm all for it. It would be cheap and would probably deter dirt bags. But, they just need to serve the punishment swiftly. None of this sitting on death row for 20freaken years. When they are found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt they hang by the neck until dead within the month.

    ReplyDelete
  36. Hell yeah...no appeals...nothing. Bill's express lane would be perfect, especially for T.J. Leggs! Everybody is so worried about prisoner's appeals and prisoner's rights, well what about their victims? Did the killer give them a pardon or consider their rights? HELL NO!

    ReplyDelete
  37. If he doesnt he and others that dont support it would never get my vote for anything again

    ReplyDelete
  38. This not an emotionally charged consideration to solve. A purely mathematical one. Rapists, child molesters, sex offenders, attackers of elderly people, - once convicted beyond any doubt, they cost the law abiding, taxpaying citizens in the millions of dollars to house, feed, & maintain. The mathematical & just means to fix this problem, along with recycling - destroy them. Not totally, mind you. They could then be used as shark food for oceanic & marine studies. See, they could serve a useful purpose. Plenty of sharks and other predators that need food. Hey - wait. How about just loading them on to a boat with experienced fishermen, slashing them just a couple of times, tie a rope around their ankles, and using them as live bait? Fish food. Sure. See? All useful, and great for the sportfishing industry. And the idea of them being eaten alive by a carnivorous fish or the like means no taxpayer monies spent on cleanup or waste removal. And also, the fishermen would volunteer to take them on a deep sea trip - for free. I'm sure.

    ReplyDelete
  39. No, O'malley should not reinstate the death penalty.

    Governor BOB should reinstate it in 2010!!!

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.