DelMarVa's Premier Source for News, Opinion, Analysis, and Human Interest Contact Publisher Joe Albero at alberobutzo@wmconnect.com or 410-430-5349
DelMarVa's Premier Source for News, Opinion, Analysis, and Human Interest Contact Publisher Joe Albero at alberobutzo@wmconnect.com or 410-430-5349
Well I think if people on welfare system would quit popping out babies so they can stay on it would be a great start!
ReplyDeleteIt's not reducing the population it is reducing the population of the burdens of society. This would be great if we actually get these people to use them. As long as we reward these people for having babies and subsidizing it the problem will never go away. Truthfully this is a back door way of funding abortion clinics without the populous knowing.
ReplyDeletebesides, this woman is an idiot.
ReplyDeleteThe Title for this should be, "If we reduce the population of ignorant welfare dependent persons it will stimulate the economy".
ReplyDeleteI didn't get from that small clip that she is implying people who can support their own families should be limited to the number of children they can have.
I am all for sterilization in mothers and fathers of multiple children that are receiving welfare for extended periods of time. The breeders are not capable of showing values within themselves, there is no way they are contributing anything but harm to society.
How about we start deporting the illegals so they can stop coming here to have anchor babies. How much do we spend on that alone, not to mention the cost to educate them AND the cost the government is paying to print everything with english and spanish on it.... oh and dont forget companies that have to hire extra employess that speak spanish so they can translate. Lets start with curbing the illegals coming in here and having babies. The illegals dont even have to prove they are here legally to get welfare how stupid is that.
ReplyDeleteRepublicans should be thrilled about this, they are always complaining about "welfare mothers".
ReplyDeletePills are a lot cheaper than kids. But have to find something to harp on and hold up stimulus because it is a democratic bill. Total babies
That lost post sounds like your buddy twosentz , Joe.
ReplyDeleteWasnt the dumacrates the one who put all that pork in the stimuluos bill after their messiah Aga Obama specifically told them no ear marks ?
How well they listen.
Unless the Government is going to just split the "loot" up amunst us citizens, they should not even consider robbing us again. Didnt they steal enough the first time around?
ReplyDeleteI guess greed knows no bounds, and they think they are going to keep taking untill one of two things happen:
1) they run out of money
2) we revolt and put a end to their theiving ways
Oh yeah theres a third...The people stop electing the crooks in the first place.
We ought to impose a limit on how many times the Government can "take" our money during a "term" in office.
ReplyDeleteShe couldnt even keep her man from well... you know.
ReplyDelete10:09
ReplyDeleteI dont think physical violence is the answer. But I for one will not re-elect any of the crooks another term. For any office. Even the local dog catcher!
wilkersonTell me what this country has achieved without violence. Its the human way, always has been. They will keep on screwing us until we stop them. It isnt pretty but it is reality. The days coming where thats all well be left with, its coming. When people dont respect the things they should all that leaves you with is respect through fear. I wish this wasnt the case but I know it is. Always hope the best and prepare for the worst. Our goverment is headed to collapse, our states are headed to bankruptsy, our social security is almost broke, our bankers are pieces of crap, and we have raised a generation or two of the most useless people this nation has ever seen. Welcome to the REVOLUTION. At one time they called our founding fathers terrorist, now we praise them as patriots.
ReplyDeleteAnd a woman from California just popped out 8 babies. They've got to stop these fertility drugs.
ReplyDeleteIs it just me or has Nancy P. had way too much Botox? She has absolutely no wrinkles on her forehead. A hard feat to accomplish when you're that old. But I digress, The real question is, ARE WE WILLING TO BE CHINA NOW AND HAVE BABY LIMITS? The real issue is through our welfare system we reward mothers for having more babies by giving them more money. We reward couples by having them NOT marry by penalizing them if they do. The real issue is the way the government rewards those by going against common sense and having it backwards. Have more babies we'll give you more money. Support comdoms even though we know they're not going to use them like responsible adults. Don't worry about finding work, we will take care of you so you can have more babies. Seems kinda backwards when you can make more more money staying home than going to work and earning it. Poor governmental management from both parties and lack of fiscal responsibilty is what has caused the mess. Not to mention political correctness. We would want anyones feelings to get hurt now would we?
ReplyDeleteRick
my two cents:
ReplyDeleteif you are caught using/selling drugs or are arrested while living in sec 8 housing you are kicked off the program.
i know that there are people who hit hard times and need a temporary govt. safety net.
but i think we should simply have a requirement: once you are ON govt. assistance, no more babies. if you get pregnant while ON assistance already, you're out of the program. that way, people can choose to have all the kids they want, but taxpayers aren't paying for people to abuse the system.
plus, i like michigan's law. was this article posted here? i can't remember, but i totally agree with the courts on this one:
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5h11udaQmhDsfikmbKlnmHPY3z3qgD95PRFJ80
HAVE the kids - just don't expect anyone else to pay for it.
i don't understand why this isn't already in place for anyone who gets federal or state money.
So everyone here agrees this is money well spent.
ReplyDeleteIn order for condoms and pills to work, one must have enough sense to use them properly. Intelligent, responsible people who understand how many children and when they can afford them understand and use the concept.
ReplyDeleteIdiots do not.
This is why we have more idiots than sensible people to vote in the next candidate.
Kick all the illegal immigrants out and our population problem and welfare expenses will dwindle. There should not be any welfare. It is the luck of the draw. It is like how long will you live. Everything is a gamble.Some people work hard, finish school ,learn how to save, drive the same car 10 years, eat home and not at restaurants,etc.My mother died at 41 and father at 83 and other relativer final note varied. None of them died before God called them home. So why are we spending millions on trying to cure cancer, heart, etc. which is working against God. He will let you stay on this earth as long as he sees fit. Nothing can end your life until heaven is ready for you.What is so great about today's world? Heaven will provide a life so good that mortals can't even conceive of it. God bless you.
ReplyDeleteLet's be honest here. The people Madame Goebbels is talking about AREN'T the ones on welfare or illegals having anchor babies.
ReplyDeleteThose are the two most loyal groups of the dummycrat party.
We know who she's talking about.
You and me folks.
Someone once suggested that they thought the government started the AIDS epidemic to reduce the population....now this? Were they right? Can we look forward to some kind of new epidemic to reduce the population?
ReplyDeleteThis is scary as hell.
I agree with the comments on the illegals. They come here already pregnant to have their baby on US soil so their kid will be legal....then they end up before some pathetic bleeding heart judge (if we're lucky) only to be allowed to stay "because of the child".