By Drs. John Bartkovich and Vince Perrotta • November 2, 2008
On Thursday, we read with great dismay as a few local doctors misrepresented the views of Maryland Sen. Andy Harris and claimed Democrat Frank Kratovil was the better candidate when it comes to health care. Their reasoning was flawed and facts were misrepresented. There is no question Kratovil's plans for our health care system would be detrimental to patients, and the system at large.
Harris is not only a colleague, he knows a system of socialized medicine would spell the end of America's leadership in health care. As physicians, we know the economic hardship faced by our patients due to the rising cost of health care. Two primary factors in this continual escalation are endless, usually baseless, litigation by trial lawyers and state mandates on health insurers.
We need only look to see where trial lawyers are throwing their money in this election -- at Frank Kratovil -- to know doctors and their patients will receive no relief from unnecessary tests and procedures if Kratovil is elected to Congress. More litigation will only increase the cost of health care, while contributing nothing to the health of our patients.
We read baseless criticism of Harris' votes in the Maryland legislature. It is true Harris voted against mandating certain tests.
Why? The simple fact is almost every health insurer already covers these routine and necessary tests. However, every time the state mandates changes to coverage, the cost of health insurance rises. Why cause unnecessary cost increases when we are already receiving these benefits?
We read the ridiculous claims that America has a nearly Third World health care system. Do any of us really believe this? In the countries Kratovil and his supporters believe we should emulate, rationing of care is the norm. Patient choice has long gone by the wayside.
We are blessed with fine local hospitals. Just a short drive down the road we have Johns Hopkins, regarded as the finest medical facility in the world, and where Harris practices and teaches our next generation of physicians. When people think of excellence in health care, they think of great institutions like Hopkins, the Mayo Clinic, Sloan-Kettering, and the Cleveland Clinic. When was the last time you heard someone say they wanted to travel to Montreal or Berlin for top-flight medical care?
We cannot in good conscience advocate a system that strips away choice from our patients, rations their access to care and all but guarantees the systematic change of the world's leading health care system into a maze of bureaucracy and waiting lines. Why do a few of our colleagues?
We are forced to question their motives. While there is no question patient care would suffer under the schemes advocated by Kratovil, the doctors signing Thursday's op-ed are in a position to benefit from a system of socialized medicine. Perhaps some of us would benefit. That is not why we became doctors.
Our patients are and will continue to be our primary concern. That is why we firmly believe Harris will best serve us, our patients, our community and our nation as congressman.
Bartkovich and Perrotta write on behalf of the following doctors who are Wicomico County residents: Jason Arrington, Emerson Conrad, Ben Tacheron, Un Chin, Brion McCutcheon, David Sechler, Chris Pellegrino, David Schalk, Tom Brandon, Jim Skolka, Tom Kelly, Joseph Swartz, John Reilly, John Giustozzi, Nancy Tustin, Marvin Nielsen and Andrew Vennos.
Just what the doctored ordered, You got know heart Frank and these men alt to know. Your a left wing liberal disgrace.
ReplyDeleteRepublicans are against regulation . . . unless that regulation helps the wealthier among us. Deregulate utilities, deregulate credit card companies, reduce audits of large corporations, deregulate production/sale of automatic assault rifles, limit all laws that would regulate destruction of the environment . . . but please regulate how much money patients can get if they sue drug companies or doctors. If deregulation benefits the rich and powerful, then let the free market reign; if regulation benefits the rich and powerful, then regulate because the free market can't be trusted.
ReplyDeleteHow do you explain the fact that McCain fought for tighter regs on Freddie and Fannie in 2005 but was defeated by the Democrats, Dems like Chris Dodd and Barney Frank who profited from the fraud and now are controlling the bailout. Are you freaking kidding??Only McCain has taken on Insurance and Pharmacuetical companies, not dems!
ReplyDelete1:37
ReplyDeleteI am voting for McCain but do not consider his stands to be those of a typical Republican. Since Democrats did not control Congress in 2005, any failure to rein in Fannie and Freddie occurred with Republicans in charge of both houses.