Here are a few facts pertaining efforts to regulate Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac. The two giant mismanaged enterprises at the center of our economic and financial mess.
The following link will show the effort by the Bush administration in 2003 & John McCain and others in 2005 to address the the giant companies huge accounting irrelgularites:
http://sweetness-light.com/archive/bush-mccain-tried-to-reform-housing-finance
Also, from the congressional record bellow, is John McCain's speech on senate floor, in 2005 to try to pass regulation reform pertaining Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac:
Federal Housing Enterprise Regulatory Reform Act of 2005
The United States Senate May 25, 2006 Sen. John McCain [R-AZ]: Mr. President, this week Fannie Mae's regulator reported that the company's quarterly reports of profit growth over the past few years were "illusions deliberately and systematically created" by the company's senior management, which resulted in a $10.6 billion accounting scandal. The Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight's report goes on to say that Fannie Mae employees deliberately and intentionally manipulated financial reports to hit earnings targets in order to trigger bonuses for senior executives. In the case of Franklin Raines, Fannie Mae's former chief executive officer, OFHEO's report shows that over half of Mr. Raines' compensation for the 6 years through 2003 was directly tied to meeting earnings targets. The report of financial misconduct at Fannie Mae echoes the deeply troubling $5 billion profit restatement at Freddie Mac. The OFHEO report also states that Fannie Mae used its political power to lobby Congress in an effort to interfere with the regulator's examination of the company's accounting problems. This report comes some weeks after Freddie Mac paid a record $3.8 million fine in a settlement with the Federal Election Commission and restated lobbying disclosure reports from 2004 to 2005. These are entities that have demonstrated over and over again that they are deeply in need of reform.
For years I have been concerned about the regulatory structure that governs Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac–known as Government-sponsored entities or GSEs–and the sheer magnitude of these companies and the role they play in the housing market. OFHEO's report this week does nothing to ease these concerns. In fact, the report does quite the contrary. OFHEO's report solidifies my view that the GSEs need to be reformed without delay. I join as a cosponsor of the Federal Housing Enterprise Regulatory Reform Act of 2005, S. 190, to underscore my support for quick passage of GSE regulatory reform legislation. If Congress does not act, American taxpayers will continue to be exposed to the enormous risk that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac pose to the housing market, the overall financial system, and the economy as a whole. I urge my colleagues to support swift action on this GSE reform legislation.
Unfortunately, the bill ( 2nd attempt to regulate this mess) was blocked by Democrats and was never passed.
It's just worth noting that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac gave contributions to lawmakers who are sitting on committees that "should" regulate them. Question is WHY???
A lot of those who received contributions from the two companies sit on the House Financial Services Committee, the Senate Banking, Housing & Urban Affairs Committee, or the Senate Finance Committee. Sen. Chris Dodd (D) of CT, chairman of the Senate banking committee, received the most from Fannie and Freddie's PACs ($133,900 since 1989). Rep. Paul Kanjorski (D-Pa.), who chairs several House Financial Services Subcommittees, received $65,500. It's also worth noting that Barak Obama came in second in contributions ( $126,349) while only serving four (4) years. Go figure….
Damage control. McCain has 22 years of de-regulating under his belt. his campaign is also riddle with advisors who benefitted directly from this mess (as is, to be fair, Obama's). The fact remains, McCain is trying to avoid a debate on the economy. He is tired. He could/should have been president 8 years ago, but we cannot risk him now.
ReplyDeleteThe debate scheduled for Friday is supposed to be on national swcurity, not the economy. According to the Congressional record in 2005 McCain co=sponsored a bill in the senate to increase regulation on Fannie Mae /Freddie Mac which was defeated on a party line vote by the democrats.
ReplyDeleteFranklin Raines & Jim Johnson former CEO's of Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac are economic advisors of Obama. Do we really need to put that in the White House? Better get the facts straight.
ReplyDeleteIn 1999, McCain voted for the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, a deregulation bill which loosened restrictions on the activities of banks, brokerage houses, and insurance companies. Just one of many, many votes for deregualtion. He can't hide from his past, and he knows Obama will hammer him on this so he wants to delay the debate.
ReplyDeleteTrue, the scheduled debate was on foreign policy, but if you think that the economy was not going to be a part of it after this week, you are nuts! The economy IS a natinal security issue, probably more important than Iran or Georgia. McCain knew that, knew he was in big trouble on the economy, and tried to duck it. Obama did not fall into the trap, though, and now McCain looks foolish. he cannot handle more than one issue at a time?
ReplyDeleteWhen can you people see the light , the democrates have screwed
ReplyDeleteup this country for the past 8 years .
Sure Joe, it's the Democrats who caused this mess
ReplyDelete*rolls eyes*
Or, maybe, just MAYBE your deregulating Republicans get to OWN this trickle down mess for once. The buck stops with them. Nice try at the misdirection lil' buddy!
After only four years, I'd say Obama got the Lion's share from Fannie & Freddie.
ReplyDeleteDemocrats; what's your excuse now?
ReplyDeleteTop Recipients of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac
Campaign Contributions, 1989-2008
1. Dodd, Christopher D-CT $133,900
2. Kerry, John D-MA $111,000
3. Obama, Barack D-IL $105,849
4. Clinton, Hillary D-NY $75,550
http://www.opensecrets.org/news/2008/07/top-senate-recipients-of-fanni.html
There is time for grandstanding, time for debating and time when we need to drop everything and rescue the country. I appreciate McCain for taking time out.
ReplyDelete1:12pm, wats more important, this bill asap or a popularity contest?
ReplyDeleteHe's tired? lmao...both of them have hundreds of people doing their work for them, questions, answers, speeches, research, ect.
Osama's running around like a lost puppy.......
2:28,
ReplyDeleteGuess what? Miracle of miracles, the bailout agreement was reached without McCain! So, do you really, truly believe he needed to stop his campaign? Give me a break, he is afraid to debate and knows that his trickle down economic theories have screwed over the country. Go ahead and vote for McCain, though, and don't cry when he does exactly what he says he is going to do: cut taxes on the rich. You guys can focus on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, but what about Bear Stearns, Lehman Brothers, Merrill Lynch? The list goes on and on.
This whole mess goes back to acorn, Obamas pet project. This group blackmailed banks into giving loans to people who could not repay them. People were given 110% loans without even having to prove they had jobs. These loans were then bought Fannie Mae/ Freddie Mac and others and today we are paying for these bad loans. The fact is that not every one can afford a home.
ReplyDelete@ 2:25 PM
ReplyDeleteWhats Johns McCain excuse? His Campaign Manager was still receiving $30,000 a month from the two up until LAST month.
@ 2:28 PM
McCain took time out to be interviewed by Katie Couric and appear on Rachel Ray.
I'm not a great fan of Bush however he did try and warn about the impending crash of Fannie MAE and Freddie MAC.
ReplyDeleteannon 506:
ReplyDeletewhere is your back up? prove your statement.
"The New York Times looked at contributions from Fannie and Freddie's boards of directors and lobbyists, who are technically not employees. That analysis found Fannie and Freddie-related contributors gave $169,000 to John McCain and his related committees, compared with $16,000 to Obama and his related committees."
ReplyDeleteOnce again the pot calls the kettle black.
anon 1:45, what country have you been living in? The Republicans have had control of the executive branch and the legislative branches of government for 6 of the last 8 years. The Democrats haven't exactly had a strangle hold on the Congress for the last two due to the even split in the Senate.
ReplyDeleteanon 9:07
ReplyDeleteMcCain decided not to appear on David Letterman at the last minute, but he was getting ready for an interview with Couric.
He got more attention in the media by NOT doing Letterman because Letterman let him have it for cancelling and then doing a different show.
McCain is no fool...he may not be the best choice for President, but he is certainly no fool. He knew exactly what he was doing.
He's never taken lightly to people making jokes about him because he has no sense of humor.
1120: are you seriously quoting a NT Times article as legitimate quote without even putting the link to the article. Even the MSM media knows this is not true or else they would be pouncing all over this one.
ReplyDelete