While Billy Duvall is picking at straws to say anything to get attention, his charges about Shanie Shields are wrong. That goes for the rest of you still spreading this untrue rumor.
"If previous reports to the effect that Shields no longer lives in the district from which she was elected are correct, she is, by virtue of the ecpress terms of the City Charter, not qualified to be a member of the Council. Ergo, her vote for the Sassafras Giveaway was, in legalese, void ab initio, the legal vote was 2 to 2, and the giveaway failed."
I replied:
If you got off you old lazy ass and drove by her house in the evening you would CLEARLY see she still lives there. IF you actually spoke to Shanie Shields you'd come to learn the progress she has had in keeping that home rather than losing it.
I would think by now, considering you're a regular to my Blog you'd know I'm no fan of Shanie Shields politics but to set rumors like this and create an article on such stupidity simply proves you're too old for Blogging.
So who is bailing Shanie out? Did the Daily Times article muster up charity donations for Shanie or something? And WTF happened last night in the closed session?
ReplyDeleteJoe:
ReplyDeleteWe completely agree: let's leave Ms. Shield's personal matters out of the news and blogs unless something bears directly on her fitness or qualification for the office she holds. I, too, rarely agree with her, and I have no problem with valid criticism of her action as a Council member.
The only thing said about the closed session was it was an acquisition of property. Nothing about what type of property whether it be real property or equipment, just property.
ReplyDeleteAnother scheme in the making, I'm sure.
if i had to guess, it's the times property...no?
ReplyDeleteFor the new city government building?
ReplyDelete