Bill Clinton registers for the draft on September 08, 1964, accepting all contractual conditions of registering for the draft. Selective Service Number is 326 46 228.
Bill Clinton classified 2-S on November 17, 1964.
Bill Clinton reclassified 1-A on March 20, 1968.
Bill Clinton ordered to report for induction on July 28, 1969.
Bill Clinton refuses to report and is not inducted into the military.
Bill Clinton reclassified 1-D after enlisting in the United States Army Reserves on August 07, 1969, under authority of COL. E. Holmes.
Clinton signs enlistment papers and takes oath of enlistment.
Bill Clinton fails to report to his duty station at the University of Arkansas ROTC, September 1969.
Bill Clinton reclassified 1-A on October 30, 1969, as enlistment with Army Reserves is revoked by Colonel E. Holmes and Clinton now AWOL and subject to arrest under Public Law 90-40 (2) (a) registrant who has failed to report...remain liable for induction.
Bill Clinton's birth date lottery number is 311, drawn December 1, 1969, but anyone who has already been ordered to report for induction is INELIGIBLE!
Bill Clinton runs for Congress (1974), while a fugitive from justice under Public Law 90-40.
Bill Clinton runs for Arkansas Attorney General (1976), while a Fugitive from justice.
Bill Clinton receives pardon on January 21, 1977, from President Carter.
Bill Clinton becomes the FIRST PARDONED FEDERAL FELON ever to serve as President of the United States.
All these facts come from Freedom of Information requests, public laws, and various books that have been published, and have not been refuted by Clinton.
After the 1993 World Trade Center Place Type bombing, President Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted down and punished.
After the 1995 bombing in Saudi Arabia, which killed five U.S. Military personnel, Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted down and punished.
After the 1996 Khobar Towers bombing in Saudi Arabia, which killed 19 and injured 200 U.S. Military personnel, Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted down and punished.
After the 1998 bombing of U.S. Embassies in Africa, which killed 224 and injured 5,000, Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted down and punished.
After the 2000 bombing of the USS Cole, which killed 17 and injured 39 U.S. Sailors, Clinton promised that those responsible be hunted down and punished.
Maybe if Clinton had kept those promises, an estimated 3,000 people in New York and Washington, DC. Who are now dead would be alive today.
THINK ABOUT IT! It is a strange turn of events. Hillary gets $8 Million for her forthcoming memoir. Bill gets about $12 Million for his memoir yet to be written. This from two people who spent 8 years being unable to recall anything about past events while under oath.
Sincerely, Cdr. Hamilton McWhorter USN (ret)
This Document Has Not Been Confirmed!
I am sure in the intrest of fairnes and complete reporting, you will also include the military career of Vice Presidnet Dick Cheney, former Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, President George Bush, former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney, and Former New York Mayor Rudy Guiliani, right?
ReplyDeleteWhy post this? Bill Clinton has not been President for nearly seven years, and will never be President again. When will the G.O.P. figure this out?
This does not seem to fit into any current debate.
The point is that it makes for interesting dialouge. We all know that we are entering a period where our presidential candidates will be of the Vietnam era.
ReplyDeleteThere are many people who "dodged the draft". I am not condoning some behavior, simply stating fact. Military records have been relevant to Political discourse since George Washington.
To Dan. This post is surely relevant. The Mrs. Clinton is running for President and if we're stupid enough to vote for her, Lord help us! The two Clintons are peas in a pod. Rotten ones, at that.
ReplyDeleteI amo not going to debate the relevance of the post (we would get caught on a very slppery partisan slope.) I just wanted to drop in a reminder from my side that the architects of this war (and the one they want with Iran,) and the front runners for the G.O.P. did not go when called either.
ReplyDeleteIf it was unpatriotic for Democrats, its the same for your side too. Not being mean, just hoping for clairity among all.
Can't argue that.
ReplyDeleteDan. I am the anomymous who made the post. I do agree with you all the way around---and I am a democrat. Sometimes not proud of it, nevertheless, the choices are limited.
ReplyDeleteSeems fair, Dan, but the dems aren't really doing themselves any good on any front that I can see. But to be fair, my party (GOP) has been a let down on top of a let down as well.
ReplyDeleteHere's the way I feel right now. BOTH parties are comprised primarily of a bunch of self serving criminals. They have betrayed the trust of thier constituents and sold thier nation out to special interests and illegal aliens in order to get votes to shore up thier positions for future individual wealth. They can all say what they want, but when we the people state our position on issues loudly and clearly and are blatantly ignored, we have been betrayed.
Dan, I truly believe that if we don't stick together and demand an AMERICAN agenda from our elected officials, whether we're rep. or dem. will matter little. We have to think about this....we are Americans first and foremost. There are issues at hand that have the potential to lay our nation to waste if we don't pull together and act as One Nation. Our representatives are wasting valuable time attacking each other that could be better spent carrying out the will of the people. They talk continually about bipartisanship but act inconsistantly with the concept.
At the polls this coming election we will have an opportunity to make a change. Until then we should use the blogs to communicate with like minded people to organize change. Complacency my be our worst enemy. There is still time to make changes for the better - on both sides of the isle.
And we wonder what is wrong with this country? Gee I wonder.
ReplyDeleteWAGONMASTER
If Bill Clinton would have done his job we would NOT be in this war! He had Osama in his sights and Billy Boy let him live...this is a known fact! And anyone that thinks there weren't WMD's in Iraq...well I have a bridge for sale in Arizona. Our liberal news media was broadcasting the date of our entry into Iraq 3 months before we got there and they took that time advantage and moved or buried those WMD's. The Army Staff that leaked that info should be found and court-marshalled.
ReplyDeleteThe Iraq war has turned into another Vietnam thanks to G.W. trying to appease the liberals in congress. I love G.W. as President but totally disagree with him on this one; we should have kicked ass and taken names later...or as a saying on an old shirt I used to have "Kill Em All, Let God Sort Em Out!"
As for Iran...lol...the country is run by a mad-man and when he goes over the edge Israel won't be as nice as we have been in Iraq. That will truely be the beginning of WWIII.
dan,
ReplyDeleteyes it does fit into any debate.
the dems want Bill in the W.H. 8 more years...which to my mind is why Kerry didn't win in '04.
Smokey.....I couldn't agree more. We're being FAR too nice in Iraq. War is war....not a picnic. Our men and women in Iraq know this first hand, but the politicians here at home live in some fanasy land where everything is about flowers anf fluffy stuff. I believe that the politicians making anti-war statements are actually more interested in keeping thier high paying jobs than winning a war on terror.
ReplyDeleteIf it means keeping our people safe, I don't care if our soldiers cut off the fingers of suspected terrorists with wire cutters to extract information - it's war.
And Wagonmaster - I personally wasn't clear on your comment.
Before you all get too excited, half of the "facts" in this post are wrong! I find it very interesting that Republicans choose to go after Clinton and Kerry for their military records, when their candidates are actually far worse in that arena! I'll take a Rhodes scholar (Clinton) over a guy who protects Texas from Vietnamese air attacks any day. Let's not even start with Cheney, and the new crop of Republican candidates! It is possible to be a great president without having served in the military, you know.
ReplyDeleteFnl Frontier
C.mon people be honest-are we better off than we were ten years ago?I know I am not.
ReplyDeleteDuring the Clinton Presidency,I made close to 50k a year(good money considering I was single at the time) and we all enjoyed gas prices that were less than half what we pay now.
Fast forward to now-the cost of EVERYTHING is going up while incomes have remained stagnant.Most of us are working as many hours as we can unless they add more hours to a day and still getting deeper in debt.The proverbial wolf at the door scares me a helluva lot more than the terrorist Bush perceives to be behind every corner.It wont be dirty bombs killing us,it will be the economy when it finally crashes and burns.
Smokey: The liberals in Congress? Which liberal Congress was GW tryng to appease his first six years in office? Plus, if you guys are gong to blame Clinton for every damn thing that ever happened (becuause I am sure that that bastard had something to do with Pearl Harbor) then just put out a memo and get over it. Jesus, we get it. You guys hate Clinton. I am especially diappointed in how he ignored that memo entitled "Bin Laden Determined to Strike U.S." Oh...wait....that wasn't him.
ReplyDeleteGrandad: I agree with most of your points, and I am glad to see a less partisan approach from you. And yes, war is not nice, but to think that we here in this country are safer because of this war is fantasy. We are absolutely no safer now than we were on September 10, 2001, except that now we know that no one will be carrying a shoe-bomb. Ooooooooo.
Wagonmaster: You need to clarify your comments. What do you think is wrong with the country? If you are responding to either me or Granddad, then are you upset about eh idea of bipartisanship? Are you mad at him because he is being a "bad" Republican becuase he is not in lock-step? Or are you jsut upset with me because I am a Dem?
Thanks. Game on.
Dan
Smokey you gonna sell me that there "London Bridge" in Arizona? ROFLMFAO
ReplyDeleteNo matter the party, intelligence has been telling us since 2002 that Osama is in Pakistan and our troops are in Afghanistan and Iraq?
Not that I doubt and I do hope we have Black Op's CIA in Paki right now looking for his head on a stick.
Dan,
ReplyDeleteI have a very good friend who just got back from active duty. At first he was in Iraq and then he was stationed at the Pentagon. His MOS is military intelligence. I have known him for almost 10 years and I trust him without question. In response to a direct question I asked him, he responded "I can't begin to tell you the number of times intelligence we received from interrogations in Iraq and Afghanistan have prevented attacks here in the U.S." His statement let me know that there are things going on behind the scenes we civilians don't know about as a matter of national security. He has no political agenda. In my mind, there is no question. We definitely need to be in Iraq. I just think we should worry less about being politically correct, do our jobs, and get the hell out. Winning hearts and minds didn't work in 'Nam and it won't work in Iraq.