tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31586983.post4387922946680706936..comments2023-11-05T03:25:19.346-05:00Comments on Salisbury News: No More Cheek Swabs For DNA in Md., High Court RulesAnonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10469687445528023080noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31586983.post-34210425212406226092012-04-29T20:40:34.579-04:002012-04-29T20:40:34.579-04:00Actually, it's "buccal" swabActually, it's "buccal" swabAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31586983.post-63987490379266451522012-04-28T17:24:26.021-04:002012-04-28T17:24:26.021-04:00One is intrusive. Can you guess which one?One is intrusive. Can you guess which one?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31586983.post-35816707977077308622012-04-28T11:41:44.215-04:002012-04-28T11:41:44.215-04:00What's the difference between DNA swabs and ta...What's the difference between DNA swabs and taking and storing one's fingerprints?Daddiohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16187418142594164597noreply@blogger.com