tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31586983.post3314830617548097071..comments2023-11-05T03:25:19.346-05:00Comments on Salisbury News: CareFirst is defying a D.C. order to reinvest $56M in surplusAnonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10469687445528023080noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31586983.post-35710409990138401372015-03-20T19:55:22.136-04:002015-03-20T19:55:22.136-04:00Yes, I want my part of the surplus too. To give ba...Yes, I want my part of the surplus too. To give back part of my deductible and some things that are denied coverage.<br /><br />Probably what caused part of the surplus to begin with. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31586983.post-66472778662045480282015-03-20T09:38:30.444-04:002015-03-20T09:38:30.444-04:00As they say, it belongs to the subscribers, who pu...As they say, it belongs to the subscribers, who put it there to begin with. They should get their shares in and amount to completely exhaust the surplus. <br />It doesn't belong to government, and government should have no say in where it goes, other than to enforce its return to the subscribers, the rightful owners.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31586983.post-42366916917727471332015-03-20T08:32:56.801-04:002015-03-20T08:32:56.801-04:00I thought surpluses were to be returned to the con...I thought surpluses were to be returned to the consumer?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com